786 réponses à ce sujet

[maxpowers2525]

http://social.biowar...2&poll_id=23388

[C9316]

RocketManSR2 wrote...
*Passes fluttershy a tissue*
Here, have some popcorn.

Thank you kind sir!

[culletron1]

xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...

People need to understand that multiplayer can be added without affecting single player. If the single player experience is finished and good, you can add multiplayer features and the single player experience will be the same. I'm seeing alot of "everything spent on multiplayer is money that could've been spent on single player" well you are seeing it the wrong way.

Its not money is being put into multiplayer instead of single player, its just BioWare is spending more money. I have no idea how much it is to make a game but for example, instead of BioWare spending 2 million on the game, their spending 3 million.

If the budget is increased they could have used the increased budget on single player

Instead of spening 2 million on single player and 1 million on multi player they could have just spent 3 million on single player.

[RenegadeXV]

Lady Of Darkness wrote...
Yes this is True, The Time is Over, MP is Fact, The Wall is Broken :-) all Germany Printers Reading Mass Effect have Multiplayer se Press Information, The Native Speaker waiting to Gamescom! ^^

Do you work for these magazines/websites? It seems like you are trying to generate more views, similarly to the Xbox 360 World Magazine article...

Modifié par COGNiTiON 1, 15 août 2011 - 03:47 .

[Leonia]

LilyasAvalon wrote...

Veex wrote...

In Exile wrote...

How does co-op work with a dialogue wheel. It makes no sense.

The Old Republic seems to be making a decent go of it, for what its worth.

Mass Effect isn't Old Republic though, is it?

That's not what he was saying. TOR is a multiplayer game that definitely utilises a dialogue wheel, however. It's just an example that it *could* be done for ME as well, not necesarily that it will or should happen in ME.

[LilyasAvalon]

Clonedzero wrote...

LilyasAvalon wrote...

Veex wrote...

In Exile wrote...

How does co-op work with a dialogue wheel. It makes no sense.

The Old Republic seems to be making a decent go of it, for what its worth.

Mass Effect isn't Old Republic though, is it?

yeha, bioware has never taken ideas from their other games and used them in others.

like dragonage never adopted mass effects dialogue wheel..oh...wait a sec!

...And it's not like Dragon Age 2 wasn't a mistake even EA admitted to, nope.

[Clonedzero]

"pre-order at gamestop to get the exclusive "garrus" skin for multiplayer!"

[legion999]

C9316 wrote...

Y'all should be ashamed! These mulitplayer threads keep making fluttershy cry!!!

Yay! That makes all this worth it.

[Jorina Leto]

C9316 wrote...

Y'all should be ashamed! These mulitplayer threads keep making fluttershy cry!!!

That's because mulitplayer sucks.

And there are too many "rumors" to ignore them.

[Veex]

LilyasAvalon wrote...

Mass Effect isn't Old Republic though, is it?

I'd say thats fairly apparent, yes. Though I'm not sure what relevance that has on whether or not BioWare has found a way to incorporate multiple players into the dialogue system.

[culletron1]

MysteryNotes wrote...

Silly person..he's asking for proof that the vast majority are against multiplayer in the first place, not proof about economics.

You know, he DID bold the words.

Someone just put up a poll... So I guess we'll see if I am right or wrong on that assumption there

Modifié par culletron1, 15 août 2011 - 03:49 .

[Masquerade_Assassin]

Everyone needs to relax. This is just a rumor.

You condemn what you fully understand. It is rumored that multiplayer is making an appearance to ME3. Nothing said that it would be competitive or cooperative.

It could be a mode comparable to Halo Reach's Firefight mode. Where you and a few friends take on Hordes of enemies for fun.

It could be comparable to Splinter Cell Conviction's multiplayer where it's a prologue to Shepard's story in ME3. Perhaps you and a few friends play as another Cerberus Cell, after Shepard makes a decision on what to do with the collector base, Perhaps 8 to 9 missions that explain how Cerberus agents became indoctrinated.

Perhaps it could be competitive multiplayer map.

Whatever, the case may be you all forget to seem to remember this key fact:

BIOWARE KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE DOING!!

They have developed this series for some time now. If these rumors are true, I trust that they know what they are doing.

[Cancer Puppet]

Chris Priestly wrote...

I know nothing I will say will make you think that it is or is not going to happen.

So, just wait and see what is announced during Gamescom. I shall return to see your reactions after it is all over.

Basically, this. There are three camps here. The "Multiplayer! Told you so!" crowd, the "If there's Multiplayer I'm divorcing Bioware!" crowd, and the "Why don't we wait and see, either way it's no big deal." crowd.

When that misleading magazine cover first came out I jumped to the conclusion that multi was real. Once bitten, twice shy.

[shepskisaac]

Clonedzero wrote...

"pre-order at gamestop to get the exclusive "garrus" skin for multiplayer!"

*steals the idea for Kaidan skin*

[xXljoshlXx]

[quote]LilyasAvalon wrote...
Because it's how companies work, resources work, you're given resources, you're told to use what resources you have. You can't use resources you don't have.
[/quote]
You have proof they don't have the resources

[quote]LilyasAvalon wrote...
That's your opinion. Which means it is problably wrong[/quote]
...Then by your defination, the PEOPLE WHO ARE MAKING THIS GAME are wrong. A lot of them have come forward and said 'Mass Effect (Shepard's story arc) was NOT designed for multiplayer.[/quote]
Links and Unless 100% of the people came out and said this I can believe they mean the opposite

[quote]LilyasAvalon wrote...
Devs and companies aren't stupid enough to pass up showing off something like MP.
[/quote]
Debatable.

[RocketManSR2]

BRB, need to grab a beverge. Somebody get a broom, there's popcorn everywhere.

Modifié par RocketManSR2, 15 août 2011 - 03:51 .

[littlezack]

xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...

People need to understand that multiplayer can be added without affecting single player. If the single player experience is finished and good, you can add multiplayer features and the single player experience will be the same. I'm seeing alot of "everything spent on multiplayer is money that could've been spent on single player" well you are seeing it the wrong way.

Its not money is being put into multiplayer instead of single player, its just BioWare is spending more money. I have no idea how much it is to make a game but for example, instead of BioWare spending 2 million on the game, their spending 3 million.

Pretty much, yeah. That line of thinking assumes you could poor infinite money into the game, and it would just get better and better and better - that's not really how a budget works. Whatever money is going to be spent of Mass Effect's SP experience was already set in stone, or at least given a general guideline. EA is willing to put X and X and X amount of dollars into certain things. They have market plans, budgets, et cetera.

At any rate, I still doubt MP is in, especially since there's no more evidence now than there was the other times people thought it was in and came up with nothing. But the idea that the simple existence of MP will lead to a lackluster SP is idiotic.

[Dragoonlordz]

xXljoshlXx wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...
 if got something to say then quote my 'exact words' and reply.

Easy

Dragoonlordz wrote...
Anyways I have stated my opinion your free to feel different to your hearts content but do it in a more mature way.

Here let me copy what you posted 

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Kinect Gimmicks - Check
Multiplayer - (Apparently) Check

Whats next?

So basically this delay it would seem (imho) was purely to add those two things? Should of just released the single player RPG without delaying to add those EA features.

If they delay the game for MP and Kinect time would not be wasted for SP because SP would be finished but if they delayed for those reasons wouldn't SP get extra time to be worked which is what you always wanted.

What's your point? What are you like 5? Time wasted is what said in the follow up comment means the same if they add on to the development time at end with new features and/or if cut into previous development time. It's the same thing which my comment explained that they should not spend that extra time or cut in time on these possible two features instead spend it on single player story, quests, exploration. Seriously it's not rocket science just work it out.

It obviously was not "easy" as you state after my quote because you did infact edit one of my sentences and changed it while at same time claiming I wrote it.

Anyways it seems apparent the only thing your doing is baiting so, I'll have nothing more to do with your childish antics.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 15 août 2011 - 03:54 .

[MassStorm]

It will be fun when by installing ME3 with Multi....a window will pop-up saying

"Origin is required for gaming please install this program"

[Ghost Lightning]

So wait, Casey Hudson just lied....twice? I doubt it.

[Captain_Obvious]

xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...

People need to understand that multiplayer can be added without affecting single player. If the single player experience is finished and good, you can add multiplayer features and the single player experience will be the same. I'm seeing alot of "everything spent on multiplayer is money that could've been spent on single player" well you are seeing it the wrong way.

Its not money is being put into multiplayer instead of single player, its just BioWare is spending more money. I have no idea how much it is to make a game but for example, instead of BioWare spending 2 million on the game, their spending 3 million.

So what you're saying is that games like Call of Duty have complex and intricately crafted single player campaigns?  They have a wealth of content that does not require an additional subscription fee for career tracking?  They do not rely on the multiplayer component to market the game?

Of course multiplayer can be added without affecting single player.  However, there is a correlation between more multiplayer and less single player content once a game franchise starts to insert multiplayer into a game.  I don't believe multiplayer will be in ME3, so I don't think we need to worry either way.

[xXljoshlXx]

culletron1 wrote...

MysteryNotes wrote...

Silly person..he's asking for proof that the vast majority are against multiplayer in the first place, not proof about economics.

You know, he DID bold the words.

Someone just put up a poll... So I guess we'll see if I am right or wrong on that assumption there

The Polls do not represent everyone who bought ME1 and/or ME2 

[littlezack]

culletron1 wrote...

xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...

People need to understand that multiplayer can be added without affecting single player. If the single player experience is finished and good, you can add multiplayer features and the single player experience will be the same. I'm seeing alot of "everything spent on multiplayer is money that could've been spent on single player" well you are seeing it the wrong way.

Its not money is being put into multiplayer instead of single player, its just BioWare is spending more money. I have no idea how much it is to make a game but for example, instead of BioWare spending 2 million on the game, their spending 3 million.

If the budget is increased they could have used the increased budget on single player

Instead of spening 2 million on single player and 1 million on multi player they could have just spent 3 million on single player.

The more likely scenario is that they planned to spend 2 millions  on single player for the start, because 2 million was enough to do all that they needed to do. Adding an extra million onto that won't change a thing.

[xlI ReFLeX lIx]

culletron1 wrote...

xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...

People need to understand that multiplayer can be added without affecting single player. If the single player experience is finished and good, you can add multiplayer features and the single player experience will be the same. I'm seeing alot of "everything spent on multiplayer is money that could've been spent on single player" well you are seeing it the wrong way.

Its not money is being put into multiplayer instead of single player, its just BioWare is spending more money. I have no idea how much it is to make a game but for example, instead of BioWare spending 2 million on the game, their spending 3 million.

If the budget is increased they could have used the increased budget on single player

Instead of spening 2 million on single player and 1 million on multi player they could have just spent 3 million on single player.

Your still not getting me man. If the single player is already planned out and finished there's nothing more to add. They dont need the extra budget. The budget would be extended specifically FOR multiplayer.

[Someone With Mass]

Considering that I doubt that Mass Effect's combat system will work effectively in multiplayer...yeah, it's just a complete waste of time and money. Use that to improve something else instead.