Weskerr wrote...
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Aren't you underestimating them? That is far more dangerous than overestimating.
We saw how powerfull the reapers are. 2 fleets to take on one reaper????
I don't think I am. We have Sovereign's technological firepower and maybe even his defensive technology from studying his remains. I don't see why every specie's military wouldn't upgrade themselves. Also, we've only ever fought against 1 Reaper (Sovereign) in battle. We saw how powerful one Reaper is. Concluding that every Reaper must be as strong as Sovereign is just a guess. Yes it's possible that every Reaper is as strong as Sovereign, but you shouldn't ignore other possibilities like.Sovereign could have been one of the Reaper's strongest ships if not the strongest. We know too little about them to think "They're unstoppable. Only a miracle would allow us to beat them." Doing so blinds you to possible strategies that could actually work to defeat them.
We don't have sovereigns firewpower. Most of Sovy'r reamains are lost (as stated by Anderson).
The Tanix is based on sovereigns "leg guns" (NOT the main cannon) and is nto as powerfull as the real thing. It gave Normany the firepower of a cruiser - and we all swa how cruiser shots affected Sovereign.
Must every reaper be as strong as Sovereign? Nope. But you cna't assume that it's the only one. And they will come in numbers.
And also, upgrades don't happen over night. If you assume not every reaper will be as strong as Sovereign, then you have to assume that not every of our ships will be fully upgraded - if at all.
Also I think overestimation and underestimation of your enemy are equally dangerous.
Overestimations leads to being overpraperd and cautios. You may hesitate and miss a chance to strike.
Underestimating leads to mobilizing assets too freely, and ending loosing them badly.
While both can lead to defeat, the latter is far more likely to do so.