So you ignored the part again that I said I could agree with you if you simply said unintentional bias which you did. You also seem to forget that you yourself said it was likely unintentional bias. Now what am I not accepting? I'm not agreeing with 100%? Of course I'm not becaue none of our arguments are likely 100% true hell I was the first one to bring up that it could be unintentional bias.charmingcharlie wrote...
No my argument is NOT off you just too stubborn to accept it. Tell me did Bioware create the second poll ? Yes they did. Did Bioware give extra detail to red haired femshep and neglect the other three ? Yes they did. Therefore simply bloody logic says to us that Bioware made the second poll with an inherent bias towards red haired femshep which is what I have been saying for 3 damn pages now, you just keep going but but but.
Not really. The first poll on its own is good and thats the way I see it. The second poll could have been done better but those differences are only big or small depending on opinion so its difficult to tell if the Red head shep won because of the (in my opinion) small differences or the Red hair. Personally I seriously doubt all of the blonde shep voters stopped voting suddenly allowing the red head shep to win.Then it makes a mockery of both polls, the first poll we voted for a long haired, blue eyed, pale faced mole ridden femshep did we not ? That means if the second poll is JUST about hair colour we should have four long haired, pale faced, blue eyed, mole ridden femsheps but with different coloured hair right ? After all this is just about the hair colour and femshep 5 won with everything else right.
Then he shouldn't have because we didn't vote for that did we, we voted for a long haired blue eyed, pale faced, mole ridden femshep. That was the winner end of discussion, so by making red femshep significantly different they are basically ignoring the result of poll 1 and introduced a bias in femsheps favour because she has unique features the others do not.
Hence what I said mistake. I'm not sure if my definiation is entirely accurate but bias shows favoritism. It is likely either equal parts favoritism and mistake on the artist part or more mistake than favoritism. I mean who would have known that just by adding a few features considered small by some would immediately seem large by others who would call bias on it?
Like I said it could be either or.
Edit: You know its quite funny to even make an attempt to agree with you and still get attacked. Just lovely.
Modifié par 1136342t54 , 19 août 2011 - 09:53 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





