DA3: Moral Choice *Speculation* ~Qun or Tevinter
#201
Posté 24 août 2011 - 03:50
#202
Posté 24 août 2011 - 06:09
If forced to chose between them: On the basis of which is the lesser of two evils to live in, then I'd side with the Qunari. On the basis of protecting the freedoms that already exist, then I'd side with Tevinter. But I don't think the Tevinter Imperium would be the greatest problem the Qunari faced if they decided to invade.
Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 24 août 2011 - 06:28 .
#203
Posté 24 août 2011 - 06:24
#204
Posté 24 août 2011 - 06:32
Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 24 août 2011 - 06:32 .
#205
Posté 24 août 2011 - 06:38
Neminea wrote...
Tal'Vashoth killing people of the Qun doesn't count as killing amonst themselves since they are no longer part of the Qun. Even in the most idealized settings or societies there will be people unhappy or complaining, doesn't mean that they are right.
There's nothing "ideal" about the Qun.
#206
Posté 24 août 2011 - 06:53
The Chasind are literally on the very opposite side of the known world, they'd probably need some pretty good motivation to march that far away.
I know. That's why I would have plenty of time. lol.
#207
Posté 26 août 2011 - 12:07
jamesp81 wrote...
Neminea wrote...
Tal'Vashoth killing people of the Qun doesn't count as killing amonst themselves since they are no longer part of the Qun. Even in the most idealized settings or societies there will be people unhappy or complaining, doesn't mean that they are right.
There's nothing "ideal" about the Qun.
A society where everyone, even the lowest have a place, are needed and respected in their own way. One where there is certainty instead of doubt, where all work towards a common goal. Where non are allowed to be wasted, or starve. Where there is no rape as apparantly sex holds no meaning outside of breeding.
It may not be your way, but that doesn't mean it is not ideal to others.
#208
Posté 26 août 2011 - 12:20
jamesp81 wrote...
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
Neither, because I'd rather not see another black/ thise side/that side polarizing scenario, and would actually like to see something more complex and universally grey on many fronts.
This is about as grey as it gets. Support the mind-controlling, individuality destroying society marked by violence, or support a slave state that practices institutionalized blood magic?
Neither the Qunari nor the Tevinter are as simple as that. And it's still a simplistic, polarizing scenario for a game plot, because you're stuck between choosing option a or b. I'd like something beyond simply picking a side, I'd rather see a more complex scenario that doesn't involve definittively throwing your lot in with one group of idiots or another.
#209
Posté 26 août 2011 - 02:29
:ph34r:And why not? Why can't you through your lot in with the lesser of evils and try to change the displeasing parts of your own choice from the inside? Like Republicans vs. Democrats. I feel rather then wipe out the side I don't prefer, I'd like to fight against the one I do prefer. I'd like to lead a rebelion against Tevinter, killing blood mages and slavers. While people may see this as attacking the place I love, I see it more as saving it.Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
jamesp81 wrote...
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
Neither, because I'd rather not see another black/ thise side/that side polarizing scenario, and would actually like to see something more complex and universally grey on many fronts.
This is about as grey as it gets. Support the mind-controlling, individuality destroying society marked by violence, or support a slave state that practices institutionalized blood magic?
Neither the Qunari nor the Tevinter are as simple as that. And it's still a simplistic, polarizing scenario for a game plot, because you're stuck between choosing option a or b. I'd like something beyond simply picking a side, I'd rather see a more complex scenario that doesn't involve definittively throwing your lot in with one group of idiots or another.
#210
Posté 26 août 2011 - 05:25
"I was just following orders" is not, and never will be, a valid excuse or defense.
That's a bit harsh, isn't it? Humans aren't as upstanding and strong willed as most individuals would like to believe. The easiest example to point to is the Milgram Experiment.
In that experiment people would shock other people (not really, they were actors) despite their moral code not to, the victims begging for them, and then even after the victim had passed out or died from their shocks.
Cauthrien is divided she doesn't believe in what Loghain is doing (talk to her some and see). She's just doing her duty and following a great strategic mind and living legend who helped earn their freedom from Orlais.
While I've role-played people who find no excuse in this, my personal belief is that I have no ill feelings towards her. To me, "I was just following orders" carries some weight. People aren't superheroes. They're weak and easily influenced.
#211
Posté 26 août 2011 - 07:30
Neminea wrote...
jamesp81 wrote...
Neminea wrote...
Tal'Vashoth killing people of the Qun doesn't count as killing amonst themselves since they are no longer part of the Qun. Even in the most idealized settings or societies there will be people unhappy or complaining, doesn't mean that they are right.
There's nothing "ideal" about the Qun.
A society where everyone, even the lowest have a place, are needed and respected in their own way. One where there is certainty instead of doubt, where all work towards a common goal. Where non are allowed to be wasted, or starve. Where there is no rape as apparantly sex holds no meaning outside of breeding.
It may not be your way, but that doesn't mean it is not ideal to others.
It is a system that is designed to suppress individuality. For this reason alone, it is profoundly evil, and waging war against it is justified on this basis alone. That other stuff is inconsequential next to this one thing.
#212
Posté 26 août 2011 - 07:34
Foolsfolly wrote...
"I was just following orders" is not, and never will be, a valid excuse or defense.
That's a bit harsh, isn't it? Humans aren't as upstanding and strong willed as most individuals would like to believe. The easiest example to point to is the Milgram Experiment.
In that experiment people would shock other people (not really, they were actors) despite their moral code not to, the victims begging for them, and then even after the victim had passed out or died from their shocks.
Cauthrien is divided she doesn't believe in what Loghain is doing (talk to her some and see). She's just doing her duty and following a great strategic mind and living legend who helped earn their freedom from Orlais.
While I've role-played people who find no excuse in this, my personal belief is that I have no ill feelings towards her. To me, "I was just following orders" carries some weight. People aren't superheroes. They're weak and easily influenced.
Then they don't need to be wielding power or arms for those that might easily manipulate them.
A person is responsible for his/her actions, period, full stop. Weakness is not an excuse for that.
The Milgram Experiment is indeed disturbing and a sad commentary on a large section of humanity. It changes nothing other than to inform people what they might be dealing with. You are always responsible for the things you do.
#213
Posté 26 août 2011 - 11:01
Good and evil are relative terms, but if you look up evil in a dictionairy chances are you will not see "takes away someones individuality" as one of its definitions. It does have "morally bad or wrong" as one, but again just because it's not your way doesn't mean it shouldn't be everybody elses way.
#214
Posté 26 août 2011 - 11:11
Neminea wrote...
Again, just because the western world values individuality doesnt mean that those cultures who don't or to a lesser degree are evil. There are many non western cultures where the needs of a family unit outweighs the need of any of the individual within that family.
Good and evil are relative terms, but if you look up evil in a dictionairy chances are you will not see "takes away someones individuality" as one of its definitions. It does have "morally bad or wrong" as one, but again just because it's not your way doesn't mean it shouldn't be everybody elses way.
Which is exactly why the Qun is evil: because they firmly believe their way is the only way. They think it's not only their right but perhaps even their obligation to "educate" the "ignorant." If they aren't stopped, eventually they will force their beliefs on everyone else by simply killing everyone who does value individuality.
#215
Posté 26 août 2011 - 11:21
#216
Posté 26 août 2011 - 11:21
Agreed on that, and if/when they do come to invade it would be within everybodies rights to resist and fight.
The whole thing just irks me because I get the feeling people think they are evil because they think differently on things that in the western world are concidered human rights and "good" when I think that if you want them eradicated for that you are no better than them.
Modifié par Neminea, 26 août 2011 - 11:22 .
#217
Posté 26 août 2011 - 11:24
Neminea wrote...
@ Rifn
Agreed on that, and if/when they do come to invade it would be within everybodies rights to resist and fight.
The whole thing just irks me because I get the feeling people think they are evil because they think differently on things that in the western world are concidered human rights and "good" when I think that if you want them eradicated for that you are no better than them.
What? Would you try the "lets talk this out" button with people believing its their duty to bash opression in your head? They won't stop til they have satisfied the Qun or die trying. They must be eradicated!
Sorry rping the Tevinter mindset not really arguing lol.
Modifié par Ghost1041, 26 août 2011 - 11:28 .
#218
Posté 26 août 2011 - 11:36
What I was talking about is that I do not think them evil based on what they believe persé, and I was trying to point out the "shades of grey" the good things that their culture has.
I think everyone that tries to enforce their believes onto another is being a bit of a jerk, to put it lightly. It works both ways though, if they can't go around forcing people into their believes, we (as in anyone not of the Qun) can't do it to them either.
That is just how I think though, I prefer to be as tolerant of other believes as I can be, even if they might not make sense to me at first.
#219
Posté 27 août 2011 - 12:33
#220
Posté 27 août 2011 - 12:45
Xilizhra wrote...
Oh, I will hate them for having their own culture and beliefs, when it involves horrific torture of mages, idiotic sex segregation, and destroying the minds of those who resist too much.
This.
#221
Posté 27 août 2011 - 01:01
I don't believe those examples are "good" but I do not think in black and white when it comes to entire cultures or believe systems and I can't personally condamn them for the bads without taking the good into account, specially not in a setting where just about every culture seems heavily two-sided, and I do not believe in hating an entire culture and by proxy everyone who willingly follows the ideals of said culture.
It irks me a bit that I see people being so black and white about it (partly because I see paralels between the Qun and irl cultures, though I realise others see it as a completely seperate thing), but I guess there is nothing left to do but agree to disagree.
#222
Posté 27 août 2011 - 01:05
Inapplicable, and I'll tell you why. It seems to me very similar to clinical depression, something I'm intimately familiar with. When you're depressed, it's very common for you to not really want to leave it, or to feel that it's the only way to exist, and to resist any attempt to leave it. The Saarebas conditioning is a lot like this, right down to the suicide.This is where I or someone else will point out that thats the way they want to live. The Sarebaas you take with you in Sheparding wolves kills himself if you don't give him back
The fact that they still exist in our own society isn't a good thing either.the sexual roles are important to them (and even after 50 or so years of emancipation, still exist in our own "free" world as well, not to mention other irl cultures)
Worthy of note, but siding with Tevinter involves defending everyone else as well.I don't believe those examples are "good" but I do not think in black and white when it comes to entire cultures or believe systems and I can't personally condamn them for the bads without taking the good into account, specially not in a setting where just about every culture seems heavily two-sided, and I do not believe in hating an entire culture and by proxy everyone who willingly follows the ideals of said culture.
I'll say exactly the same things about IRL cultures if they're similarly vile.It irks me a bit that I see people being so black and white about it (partly because I see paralels between the Qun and irl cultures, though I realise others see it as a completely seperate thing), but I guess there is nothing left to do but agree to disagree.
#223
Posté 27 août 2011 - 01:23
Xilizhra wrote...
I'll say exactly the same things about IRL cultures if they're similarly vile.It irks me a bit that I see people being so black and white about it (partly because I see paralels between the Qun and irl cultures, though I realise others see it as a completely seperate thing), but I guess there is nothing left to do but agree to disagree.
Not going there, I'm out.
#224
Posté 27 août 2011 - 01:27
#225
Posté 27 août 2011 - 01:31
Xilizhra wrote...
Oh, I will hate them for having their own culture and beliefs, when it involves horrific torture of mages, idiotic sex segregation, and destroying the minds of those who resist too much.
Just like they will hate or pity you for what they percieve as idiotic ideas, a sick society and horrific values.
To me, both stances are as petty.





Retour en haut






