Biotic Sage wrote...
While I don't really care which one wins, from an objective standpoint the first vote was the one that was "unfair." Essentially, people had to vote on three separate variables: face model, hair style, and hair color. This vote is only concerned with one variable: hair color. Makes sense to me.
Nothing makes sense about that, OK so I don't like green eyes with the red hair, but that's unfairly being forced on me, where's my vote? I don't like the size of her lips with red hair and brown eyes, do I get a vote for that? You don't get to choose every tiny detail, it was a package deal, you vote of the package you like best, good with the bad, that's how voting works, that is absolutely fair. Think about it like this, don't you think some of the other options might have gone over better if they had different hair color or eye color options, but they've been disregarded, is that fair? If we're talking "fair' we got to start this whole thing over, I want number 4 with 50 different hair/eye color combinations.
Gill Kaiser wrote...
Nonsense. There's no conspiracy; everyone's not voting against the blonde, they're voting for the colour they want.
...and
just for argument's sake, even if they WERE voting "against" the
blonde, not liking blonde is a legitimate viewpoint to have, even if you
don't share it. In the end, the majority vote will still designate the
majority's preference. All this second vote is doing is distinguishing
whether the original winner won due to the hairstyle or the hair colour.
Complete bull, this is nothing but a vote to get rid of the blonde and I hope it blows up in their face and they get an even worst wave of complaining. The majority vote DID dictate the majorities preference, which then the minority complained about and now that their going to be the majority, they get their way.