371 réponses à ce sujet

[FieryDove]

happy_daiz wrote...

Sometimes I wish there were 2 separate forums: one for the people who loved DA2, and one for people who didn't.

That is not fair. What about those that liked/loved both?

Modifié par FieryDove, 19 août 2011 - 08:56 .

[happy_daiz]

FieryDove wrote...

happy_daiz wrote...

Sometimes I wish there were 2 separate forums: one for the people who loved DA2, and one for people who didn't.

That is not fair. What about those that liked both?

Just like everything else, it would be your choice. 

[Cutlass Jack]

Rovay wrote...

Still however, some people would complain that the opossing forum's "Kumbaya" is too loud.

And don't get me started about the cross-forum panty raids...

[xkg]

Serpieri Nei wrote...
What about those of us that DON'T want to play DA2?

Ha, good question lol but you are asking the wrong person - I am on the "don't want" side of the fence ...
+ I am asking the same question myself.

Modifié par xkg, 19 août 2011 - 08:58 .

[nitefyre410]

Rovay wrote...

nitefyre410 wrote...

Well anyway I can see where this thread is going, so I'm just going to say   INB4 Lock

and

*snip*

Can I have some?

 

Sure

[FieryDove]

happy_daiz wrote...

Just like everything else, it would be your choice. 

There is no choice, only illusion of choice.

Cutlass Jack wrote...

And don't get me started about the cross-forum panty raids...

Please...get started.

Modifié par FieryDove, 19 août 2011 - 08:59 .

[happy_daiz]

FieryDove wrote...

happy_daiz wrote...

Just like everything else, it would be your choice. 

There is no choice, only illusion of choice.

Got me there! 

[Rovay]

Cutlass Jack wrote...

Rovay wrote...

Still however, some people would complain that the opossing forum's "Kumbaya" is too loud.

And don't get me started about the cross-forum panty raids...

Actually, I think it would be interesting to watch. From a safe distance of course. And behind bulletproof glass, just to be on the safe side.

Modifié par Rovay, 19 août 2011 - 09:01 .

[nitefyre410]

Rovay wrote...

Cutlass Jack wrote...

Rovay wrote...

Still however, some people would complain that the opossing forum's "Kumbaya" is too loud.

And don't get me started about the cross-forum panty raids...

Actually, I think it would be interesting to watch. From a safe distance of course. And behind bulletproof glass, just to be on the safe side.

 

Bah   never doubt the  

[Captain_Obvious]

Serpieri Nei wrote...

xkg wrote...

Captain_Obvious wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

My level of dread just rose even further. If you try to please everyone, you please no one almost invariably.

Just admit that DA2 was a mistake (to yourselves if not us) and go back to the general DAO model and improve on that.

-Polaris

Negative, I have absolutely no desire for a return to the "general DA:O model."  If I want to play DA:O, I play DA:O. 

So what do you suggest ? Completly new game - without any resemblance to DAO/DA2.

Because following your logic - if I want to play DA2, I play DA2.

What about those of us that DON'T want to play DA2?

The hopefully we can both get something else.  Look, I liked Origins well enough, but I don't want a re-skin of any game.  Well, maybe KOTOR, but that's it.  I just don't see the point to going back to what was clunky in DA:O.  There's no Holy Grail of RPG contained anywhere in Origins.  By your logic as well, what about those of us that DON'T want to play DA:O?  We already have both of those games, let's move on to something else.  If Bioware wants to re-skin Origins, that's fine, but it's not something that I would want to play.  Been there, done that.  Some games have very high replay value for me, and Origins just doesn't. 

[happy_daiz]

We just really like doing this.


Edit: Ooh, I found a better one.
 

Modifié par happy_daiz, 19 août 2011 - 09:06 .

[FieryDove]

happy_daiz wrote...

We just really like doing this.

 

And this:


And this:

[xkg]

happy_daiz wrote...

We just really like doing this.

[SNIP]
 

You mean posting crap to get thread locked ?

[WidowMaker9394]

[Inappropriate post removed]

Modifié par JohnEpler, 19 août 2011 - 09:11 .

[FieryDove]

xkg wrote...

You mean posting crap to get thread locked ?

Yes. But it was going there anyhow...might as well...jump.

[csfteeeer]

Captain_Obvious wrote...

Serpieri Nei wrote...

xkg wrote...

Captain_Obvious wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

My level of dread just rose even further. If you try to please everyone, you please no one almost invariably.

Just admit that DA2 was a mistake (to yourselves if not us) and go back to the general DAO model and improve on that.

-Polaris

Negative, I have absolutely no desire for a return to the "general DA:O model."  If I want to play DA:O, I play DA:O. 

So what do you suggest ? Completly new game - without any resemblance to DAO/DA2.

Because following your logic - if I want to play DA2, I play DA2.

What about those of us that DON'T want to play DA2?

The hopefully we can both get something else.  Look, I liked Origins well enough, but I don't want a re-skin of any game.  Well, maybe KOTOR, but that's it.  I just don't see the point to going back to what was clunky in DA:O.  There's no Holy Grail of RPG contained anywhere in Origins.  By your logic as well, what about those of us that DON'T want to play DA:O?  We already have both of those games, let's move on to something else.  If Bioware wants to re-skin Origins, that's fine, but it's not something that I would want to play.  Been there, done that.  Some games have very high replay value for me, and Origins just doesn't. 

Ok, and what about those who DO find replay value in DAO?
What about those who see no reason to stay with DA2 like you see no reason to go back to DAO?
 you want them to Re-Skin DA2 or what?

[John Epler]

Let's bear in mind that a reasonable amount of civility is required to post on these forums, thanks.

[Rovay]

xkg wrote...

happy_daiz wrote...

We just really like doing this.

[SNIP]
 

You mean posting crap to get thread locked ?

At least it saves us from you people making another pointless DA2 vs. DA:O flame war that this thread will inevitably end with.

Modifié par Rovay, 19 août 2011 - 09:13 .

[John Epler]

And let's also try and cut out the off-topic posts, please.

[FieryDove]

JohnEpler wrote...

And let's also try and cut out the off-topic posts, please.

Sorries.

I got...spiked by the Red Lyrium I think. Yes I will blame that.

[xkg]

Rovay wrote...

xkg wrote...

happy_daiz wrote...

We just really like doing this.

[SNIP]
 

You mean posting crap to get thread locked ?

At least it saves us from you people making another pointless DA2 vs. DA:O flame war that this thread will inevitably end with.

In case you don't know here is a hint for you : no one force you to read or to post in any thread. You don't like it don't read it.

[Captain_Obvious]

csfteeeer wrote...

Ok, and what about those who DO find replay value in DAO?
What about those who see no reason to stay with DA2 like you see no reason to go back to DAO?
 you want them to Re-Skin DA2 or what?

I already answered that question, but I don't think you read it:

"Then hopefully we can both get something else." 

That's what I wrote above, and that's what I'd like to see. 

[Lord Gremlin]

To be honest - there is just too much **** in DA2, so when someone says "best of DAO and DA2" natural assumption will be "half of the thing will be ****". Look, there is no denying that some things were better in DA2: like, better visual effects for spells, spell effects disappearing when not in combat. It's just that all this pales in comparison to just how bad the whole thing was.

Also: if you beat a dead horse on a sunny day it may explode. Let us continue.

[AtreiyaN7]

xkg wrote...

Captain_Obvious wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

My level of dread just rose even further. If you try to please everyone, you please no one almost invariably.

Just admit that DA2 was a mistake (to yourselves if not us) and go back to the general DAO model and improve on that.

-Polaris

Negative, I have absolutely no desire for a return to the "general DA:O model."  If I want to play DA:O, I play DA:O. 

So what do you suggest ? Completly new game - without any resemblance to DAO/DA2.

Because following your logic - if I want to play DA2, I play DA2.

Following Ian's logic, DA3 should be more of DA:O because he wants it that way.

[FieryDove]

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Following Ian's logic, DA3 should be more of DA:O because he wants it that way.

I have something better that is new and innovative too!

DA3 should be like DA3!