You say these things....is it because your father was a batarian?!?Someone With Mass wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
Anyone that is not putting Humanity at the top of their priority list is a traitor.
I have yet to be given a solid reason why I should give a **** about them beyond belonging to the same species.
Who will you choose? Which species do you save?
#126
Guest_JulyAyon_*
Posté 20 août 2011 - 11:05
Guest_JulyAyon_*
#127
Posté 20 août 2011 - 11:09
Modifié par Candidate 88766, 20 août 2011 - 11:10 .
#128
Posté 20 août 2011 - 11:10
#129
Posté 20 août 2011 - 11:33
#130
Posté 20 août 2011 - 11:42
Apart from that: humans, asari and turians are natural allies. Other species will play their part but are either too weak or too unstable and unreliable.
As far as future imperialist ambitions go, it makes sense to save the weakest, ie quarians, volus and drell. But then of course those species couldn't offer as much in subjection to humanity as the like of the turians could.
#131
Posté 20 août 2011 - 12:10
Turians - Military
Salarians - brains
Krogan - raw power
Asari - because all other species respect them
Quarians - largest fleet but weak immune system and not that many compared to other species.
Drell (low population as it is, even if they were saved, they're doomed already I think)
Rachni - I saved 'em once before
Volus - don't seem to be able to bring much to the war effort.
Elcor - ...
Geth (I put these lower down because you could always rebuild them if they proved themselves allies)
Batarians - Shepard killed a whole lot of 'em already
Vorcha - parasites really
Modifié par CommanderJessica, 20 août 2011 - 12:15 .
#132
Posté 20 août 2011 - 12:21
Saphra Deden wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
@Sisterofshane,
Note that I placed 3 of the weakest nations at the top of my list. Humans are my number 1 priority, always, and those species pose the least threat to humanity, and would actually probably be amenable to joining us as a client species.
This is pretty much what I'd do. I'd want to save the species that are the least competitive with humanity and can more easily be influenced/controlled in the aftermath.
That means the asari, turians, salarians, and batarians are at the bottom of my list when it comes to priority followed by the krogan. I really don't consider the vorcha much of a threat because they aren't capable of space travel on their own.
So I'd prioritize preserving the quarians, elcor, hanar, drell, volus, and any other "lesser" races.
Of-course this all depends a bit on circumstance. I want to save Earth above all else and if the best way to do that is to save the big three and others then I'll do it.
Do I understand this correctly?
You imply that if you can sacrifice the "big three" (and the batarians and Krogans) you would? Even if you had a chance to save them?
Wow, If this is the case, I really hope you play a renegade Shepard. You propose to be a bystander to genocide on a massive scale for the possibility of a benefit for humanity. You must love TIM.
#133
Posté 20 août 2011 - 12:29
Gruntyfy wrote...
Saved / Sacrifice
Krogans / Volus
Asari / Vorcha
Turians / Batarians
Salarians / Elcor
Quarians / Geth
You cannot save all species, who will you help?
If i need to choose even further i will save,
Krogans over Turians
Salarians over Quarians
Humans over Asari
What are your choices?
I'm kind of cofused at the pairing why would i have to save either the Krogan or the Volus or the Salarians over the Elcor?
#134
Posté 20 août 2011 - 12:33
I agree with this post. Almost exactly, except I'd say Vorcha are more like Rabid cats.CommanderJessica wrote...
Humans - my own species, shown that they can hold their own etc.
Turians - Military
Salarians - brains
Krogan - raw power
Asari - because all other species respect them
Quarians - largest fleet but weak immune system and not that many compared to other species.
Drell (low population as it is, even if they were saved, they're doomed already I think)
Rachni - I saved 'em once before
Volus - don't seem to be able to bring much to the war effort.
Elcor - ...
Geth (I put these lower down because you could always rebuild them if they proved themselves allies)
Batarians - Shepard killed a whole lot of 'em already
Vorcha - parasites really
#135
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 août 2011 - 12:59
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
MrFob wrote...
Do I understand this correctly?
You imply that if you can sacrifice the "big three" (and the batarians and Krogans) you would? Even if you had a chance to save them?
Yes, that is what I'm saying. Their misfortune can be humanity's gain.
Indeed I have great respect for the Illusive Man.
My goal in this fight since the begining has been to elevate and save humanity. Anyone else is just a means towards achieving that goal.
#136
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:05
#137
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:08
low priority - humans, batarians, geth
#138
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:11
Seboist wrote...
The important thing to remember is that a galaxy without humans is not a galaxy worth saving. That puts everything else in perspective.
Nah.
#139
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:11
Saphra Deden wrote...
MrFob wrote...
Do I understand this correctly?
You imply that if you can sacrifice the "big three" (and the batarians and Krogans) you would? Even if you had a chance to save them?
Yes, that is what I'm saying. Their misfortune can be humanity's gain.
Indeed I have great respect for the Illusive Man.
My goal in this fight since the begining has been to elevate and save humanity. Anyone else is just a means towards achieving that goal.
I'd prefer to focus my energy on saving humanity rather than elevating it. It would be fine if humanity could gain advantages from this war, but screw the races that have the biggest fleet (Turians, Salarian and Asari) could cause problem on the mission of saving Earh. How are you going to take back Earth withouth those species and their military power?
Anyway, I don't think that in ME3 there will be the possibility to choose the minor species over the major species. Maybe there'll be some decisions that will lead the three major species to be weaker and humanity to be stronger after the war, but I seriously doubt that we're going to have the option to completely wipe out Turians, Salarians and Asari. Probably one of them, but not all three.
Modifié par hhh89, 20 août 2011 - 01:14 .
#140
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:12
Saphra Deden wrote...
MrFob wrote...
Do I understand this correctly?
You imply that if you can sacrifice the "big three" (and the batarians and Krogans) you would? Even if you had a chance to save them?
Yes, that is what I'm saying. Their misfortune can be humanity's gain.
Indeed I have great respect for the Illusive Man.
My goal in this fight since the begining has been to elevate and save humanity. Anyone else is just a means towards achieving that goal.
Well, to each their own I guess. Although I hope you do only adopt the stance in the light that this is just a fictional decision and that you are just role-playing your character well. In that case, kudos.
#141
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:14
Seboist wrote...
The important thing to remember is that a galaxy without humans is not a galaxy worth saving. That puts everything else in perspective.
But to save Earth we need the military power and the fleet of the most powerful species. We can't save Earth only with the Elcor and the Volus. Geth and Quarians are the only other species with big fleets, and we'll probably have to choose between them (or try to reach peace), so we can't choose them over the Turians, Salarians and Asari.
#142
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:15
BlueDemonX wrote...
Seboist wrote...
The important thing to remember is that a galaxy without humans is not a galaxy worth saving. That puts everything else in perspective.
Nah.
+1
#143
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:23
#144
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:24
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
MrFob wrote...
Well, to each their own I guess. Although I hope you do only adopt the stance in the light that this is just a fictional decision and that you are just role-playing your character well. In that case, kudos.
I don't donate money to overseas disasters, so what does that tell you?
#145
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:27
Arijharn wrote...
Sure I want to save the other species too, but I can't see why humanity shouldn't benefit from the experience...
I agree, the most important thing is to save humanity. I'd be fine if humanity will have the same aumont of power (in comparison of the other species, because no specie will have the same power they had before the war) that we had before the war.
#146
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:28
Arijharn wrote...
Sure I want to save the other species too, but I can't see why humanity shouldn't benefit from the experience...
Hopefully my Shepard will have an intact human-led coalition of non-citadel alien species to deal with the Asari,Turians and Salarians after the Reaper war is over.
#147
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:30
Arijharn wrote...
Sure I want to save the other species too, but I can't see why humanity shouldn't benefit from the experience...
Humanity doesn't benefit from the experience if everything is in ruins and the galaxy sinks in anarchy and chaos.
#148
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:31
Guest_Arcian_*
That you're a selfish douchebag who will suffer eternally in that special hell where selfish douchebags go when they are inevitably wiped from existence as a consequence of their selfishly douchebaggish ways?Saphra Deden wrote...
MrFob wrote...
Well, to each their own I guess. Although I hope you do only adopt the stance in the light that this is just a fictional decision and that you are just role-playing your character well. In that case, kudos.
I don't donate money to overseas disasters, so what does that tell you?
#149
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:31
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Barquiel wrote...
Humanity doesn't benefit from the experience if everything is in ruins and the galaxy sinks in anarchy and chaos.
Yes it does. It means that by the time the rest of the galaxy recovers humanity will be well ahead of them. Much like Europe being devestated while America remained unscathed.
#150
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 20 août 2011 - 01:33
Guest_Arcian_*
That might be the worst analogy I have ever heard in my entire life.Saphra Deden wrote...
Barquiel wrote...
Humanity doesn't benefit from the experience if everything is in ruins and the galaxy sinks in anarchy and chaos.
Yes it does. It means that by the time the rest of the galaxy recovers humanity will be well ahead of them. Much like Europe being devestated while America remained unscathed.





Retour en haut




