408 réponses à ce sujet

[DarkDragon777]

I would save: Asari, Turians, Humans (the perfect species), Salarians, Krogan, Volus (remember their economic power), Geth, Rachni, Yahg, and Quarians

Would not save: Elcor, Hanar, Vorcha, Drell (they're doomed), and Raloi (useless)

[Someone With Mass]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

That actually sorta works in the quarians advantage..their homes are mobile, so they can move away.

You know what they also have? Zero population growth.

[Narosian]

Save:
Everyone

I refuse to play by the rules.  Can't save everyone huh?  Too bad, I'm going to anyway.

[Ritara]

Everyone but Vorcha and Batarians....and one human :

Modifié par rita25, 21 août 2011 - 11:27 .

[NamiraWilhelm]

Everyone if i can

[Someone With Mass]

Narosian wrote...

Save:
Everyone

I refuse to play by the rules.  Can't save everyone huh?  Too bad, I'm going to anyway.

Screw the rules, I have money deus ex machina!

[SandTrout]

hhh89 wrote...

Humanity is on the top of my priority list. But to save humanity I need the other species. Especially the strong ones.
Though I'm not going to intentionally screw some species. While my main mission will be to save humanity, I'll try to support and save as many species as I can,(if there's going to be some type of limit) so that they can help me fight the Reapers and save Earth.  And I'll start with the strongest.

Well, this, at least, is a healthy attitude. Judging by tactical advantage necessary to defeat the Reapers is a perfectly good reason for saving the Big 3.

[AmyMac]

Depends on the playthrough, actually. I'm one of those people who tries to actually roleplay different versions of Commander Shepard, so, for example, none of my Shepards with the colonist background would shed a tear over sacrificing the batarians. Spacer Shepard might be more inclined to treat them equally (at least, with other non-council races).
Another example: my Earthborn/Ruthless/mostly renegade vanguard would place a high priority on saving the krogan, since she shares the warrior culture mentality that they have, whereas my Spacer/Sole Survivor/almost totally paragon sentinel will be a lot more apprehensive about saving them.

[jbblue05]

Humans

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

1) Humans -- of course, they're my species
2) Asari -- culture
3) Salarian -- science
4) Quarian -- tech
5) Turian -- security --> let these guys blow their budget being galactic cops
6) Hanar -- saving them saves the Drell
7) Drell
8) Elcor -- they never did anything
9) Volus -- don't know much about them other than the few annoying ones
10) Rachni -- but I don't think we'll have to worry because their location is unknown.
11) Krogan -- because they can build spaceships now, and they will continually require updating the genophage to control population. It will depend upon how successful Wrex will be.
12) Batarian -- my Shepard hates Batarians.
13) Geth -- won't require saving because they're machines and if anything they'll live in their Dyson sphere.
14) Vorcha -- semi-intelligent pests. They would spread like vermin.

I only think we'll be able to save five to six species. Many of the Batarians would be pretty much made into husks by ME3 time, or would be flying in along side the Reapers to Earth.

[Gabey5]

My priorities

1. Humans
2.Geth
3.Salarians
4. Asari
5. Turians
6. Hanar
7.Drell
8.Quarians
9. Elcor
10. Vorcha- they still have some evloving to do so i don't hold their stupidity against them, they were introduced to space way to early by outsiders
11. Volus

rachni and krogan are not even worth saving, two worthless races

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

MrFob wrote...

Do I understand this correctly?
You imply that if you can sacrifice the "big three" (and the batarians and Krogans) you would? Even if you had a chance to save them?

Yes, that is what I'm saying. Their misfortune can be humanity's gain.

Indeed I have great respect for the Illusive Man.

My goal in this fight since the begining has been to elevate and save humanity. Anyone else is just a means towards achieving that goal.

Prioritizing and wanting what is best for humanity is one thing but deliberately letting other species die just so you can gain an advantage in a post-war power grab is screwed up.

[TheOptimist]

SandTrout wrote...

raynbow wrote...

i would save them all.

He who attempts to defend everything will defend nothing.

But he who SUCCEEDS at defending everything is a badass.  I second the motion, raynbow.

[KotorEffect3]

I have always said it is a numbers game for me. The species with the lowest populations are more likely to be sacrificed in order to save the most people. That being said there are other possible factors to consider that might come in some unforseen circumstances so in all it really depends on the context of the situation.

[John_Lock240]

Save:
1. Pyjaks
2. Space Cow
3.Thresher Maw
4. all others

Sacrifice:
Batarians

[KotorEffect3]

Not that they are a real species in the sense of the word but I wonder what is going to happen with the keepers because they are similar to the collectors in that they are a species that were repurposed by the reapers just like the collectors were mutated enslaved protheans. In my opinion wiping out the collectors was doing them a favor. I wonder what will happen to the keepers.

[Last Vizard]

Saphra Deden wrote...

TobyHasEyes wrote...

And again we reach this inevitable point where it is insisted that everyone is just waiting to dominate you and as such you have to dominate others

They are. What do you think the Council is?

Have you paid attention at all to Council history?

Krogans, Quarians and Batarian (as much as i hate them) are a good example of what happens to weak species in citadel space.

[Last Vizard]

Barquiel wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

Sure I want to save the other species too, but I can't see why humanity shouldn't benefit from the experience...

Humanity doesn't benefit from the experience if everything is in ruins and the galaxy sinks in anarchy and chaos.

Hypotheticlly, if the galaxy is in ashes and chaos reigns over non-Humanity's space..... how does that hurt us?

[Last Vizard]

Arcian wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Barquiel wrote...

Humanity doesn't benefit from the experience if everything is in ruins and the galaxy sinks in anarchy and chaos.

Yes it does. It means that by the time the rest of the galaxy recovers humanity will be well ahead of them. Much like Europe being devestated while America remained unscathed.

That might be the worst analogy I have ever heard in my entire life.

thats was an accurate analogy.

[Last Vizard]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Arppis wrote...

I have to say thou, it depends a lot on sittulation. If survival of humanity would mean sacrificing all other races, let's say. I wouldn't propably do it. Or basicaly ruining the galaxy somehow. But yeah, I'll try to save as many races as possible, including humanity.

But yeah, humanity is atm the top priority, because they are being attacked the hardest.

Not as hard as the turians...

Turians can stand to loose more because they have more worlds to loose, Humanity just has Earth and once thats gone slavers will prey on the now useless minning worlds.

[RAF1940]

I will save humanity over any other species.

Including the asari.

[Flashflame58]

My Priority List:

1. Humans
2. Asari
3. Salarians
4. Turians
5. Quarians
6. Geth
7. Drell
8. Elcor
9. Krogan
10. Volus
11. Hanar
12. Batarians
13. Vorcha