jlb524 wrote...
I will save the asari b/c they are practically a race of bisexual women.
That is all I have to say on that matter.
Modifié par RAF1940, 21 août 2011 - 03:43 .
Guest_Ferris95_*
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
Luc0s wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
Luc0s wrote...
The answer is 'WHITES' obviously. If your answer isn't 'WHITES' you're a goddamn traitor to your own race.
Someone in the 50s said the same thing once I'm sure.
Don't put words in my mouth that I didn't say!
You EDITED what I originally said and you know it!
I just reported this post. Let it not happen again.
Not putting words in your mouth. Its the context of it. Someone said something about a differnent collored person its not being selfish if the Asari Burns right?
Think about it from a different percepective then "IM HUMAN THAT MAKES HUMANS BETTER AUTOMATICALLY." and you'll see where I'm coming from here. If anything this is worse than using blacks and whites. Because your dooming an entire species because you weren't born the same.
Let me use my room analogy for the 3rd time: If you are in a room and only one of you are allowed ot walk out alive, and you could choose, what would you do? It's either A: kill the other person, or B: kill yourself.
If there a generally good person and worth more to society than me, than I'd like to think I'd make the sacrifice. I'd also like to think the rest of humanity is smart enough to put others before themselves.
Just to bring you more in line with the topic: Everytime the other person got the chance, he/she's screwed over theose under him/her to get ahead without regret.
XDMMX wrote...
Wow! I wonder what kind of mental disorder someone would have to be suffering from, to condemn there own species to extinction?
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
Would the Council help? They certainly didn't lift the saviors of the Citadel with their colonies to "preserve galactic stability".
Guest_Ferris95_*
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
Would the Council help? They certainly didn't lift the saviors of the Citadel with their colonies to "preserve galactic stability".
RAF1940 wrote...
XDMMX wrote...
Wow! I wonder what kind of mental disorder someone would have to be suffering from, to condemn there own species to extinction?
How about "Ilovehotsexybluebisexualhornywomanrace-itis"?
RAF1940 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
Would the Council help? They certainly didn't lift the saviors of the Citadel with their colonies to "preserve galactic stability".
The Council is the ME equivalent of the United Nations.
Ferris95 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
Would the Council help? They certainly didn't lift the saviors of the Citadel with their colonies to "preserve galactic stability".
That was the Citadel. Not the entire galaxy and the fate of sentient life forever. Scale matters, not to mention that public sympathies would lie with humanity at this point. Protecting them would be a good move and help the Council's public image.
kold213 wrote...
All you need is few dozen asari. They could repopulate with fewer populous since they could 'mate' with any species.
What she does after I die is of no concern to me. I hope she does find someone new; it's their way and I see no reason to change it.Volus Warlord wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Or the same thing could happen to asari under a human-controlled galaxy. In any case, those of my own flesh and blood are already all dead. Mindoir. And isn't part of your position that we should do well by our children?Get it through your head. They are NOT people. They are asari. They'll be getting their dance on as you fight, toil, and suffer. And your actions will make those of your own flesh and blood a mere historical footnote. Humanity would end up being something like the Quarians. Unwanted, undesirable, largely eradicated, and just "there," because you wanted to get it on with some asari trash. How irresponsible of you.
Children born of an asari essentially aren't even yours. They have nearly nothing to do with you. Their "relation" to you is more coincidence than anything. Especially with asari... haha.
Betray one's own race.. live as essentially a waste of genetic material.. raise "children" that you can never be sure are yours... and die like a dog. Your "children" will forget you soon and very soon for your partner's next suitor. They'll essentially have never known you, whether you were a saint or a demon. What are the positives of saving asari again?
Oh you mean like the way you jump to conclusions about people lying or call them idiots for not thinking like you?Luc0s wrote...
Please read my other posts before jumping to conclusions.
there are billions of people on the planet are you seriously telling me that you are the only person who is thinking of them?My motives to put humanity first are:
1) If I don't put humanity first, nobody else will.
Of coures it seems like that to you I can see where your coming from here but just by flat out saying "the Asari are screwed because I wasn't born one" is very close minded. What if the result saves more lives than just that? would you doom the Salarians, The Hanar, Drell, ect just because your human? How would we even survive the reapers with such idias?there are
2) Dooming your own entire race for another race seems like a traitorous thing to do.
I will say right now that I apologize for editing your post and using the White analogy I didn't intend to make it sound like you were racist but natural and what is right don't always mix. The reason I used the White vs blacks thing is because if you had to chose whites or blacks in this scenario would you still do it? (I used Dogs and Cats in my other post because it seems less offensive but my point still stands what makes Asari less deserving of life than a different colored person?)3) it's only natural that you care more about your own species than another species.
I haven't given a straight up answer to this question yet so don't put words in my mouth. I don't want to answer without more context. Will killing the Asari weaken the Reapers or will saving them do it? I don't like absolutes without more to go on.I'm "dooming" another species for the sake of my own species. You're dooming your own species for the sake of a random other species. Tell me, who's worse?
I never said race when I used black and whites and I don't mean to be offesnive when I bring them up.Also, the difference between black humans and white humans are smaller than the difference between blonde humans and brunette humans. Just saying.
Please learn a thing or two about human genetics. There basically is no such thing as "the black race" or "the white race". There only is the human race. We are ONE race.
To be fair to Ash she did say if it was the only way to survive. So you would be dead with either of your options. Though I guess the dog would survive if you ran, as dogs are usally faster than people.SpiffySquee wrote...
odd... because if my cat was trapped in a burning house, I would risk my life to save it. If a bear were chasing my I most certainly would not send a dog I loved to hold if off. That statement is one of the reason I really do not like her. We would both run, or we would both fight. I would never sacrifice something I loved and cared about just to save my own skin.
Guest_Ferris95_*
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
Would the Council help? They certainly didn't lift the saviors of the Citadel with their colonies to "preserve galactic stability".
That was the Citadel. Not the entire galaxy and the fate of sentient life forever. Scale matters, not to mention that public sympathies would lie with humanity at this point. Protecting them would be a good move and help the Council's public image.
If the Citadel was lost it would be the same as not defeating the Reapers during ME3. So... same scale.
Xilizhra wrote...
What she does after I die is of no concern to me. I hope she does find someone new; it's their way and I see no reason to change it.Volus Warlord wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Or the same thing could happen to asari under a human-controlled galaxy. In any case, those of my own flesh and blood are already all dead. Mindoir. And isn't part of your position that we should do well by our children?Get it through your head. They are NOT people. They are asari. They'll be getting their dance on as you fight, toil, and suffer. And your actions will make those of your own flesh and blood a mere historical footnote. Humanity would end up being something like the Quarians. Unwanted, undesirable, largely eradicated, and just "there," because you wanted to get it on with some asari trash. How irresponsible of you.
Children born of an asari essentially aren't even yours. They have nearly nothing to do with you. Their "relation" to you is more coincidence than anything. Especially with asari... haha.
Betray one's own race.. live as essentially a waste of genetic material.. raise "children" that you can never be sure are yours... and die like a dog. Your "children" will forget you soon and very soon for your partner's next suitor. They'll essentially have never known you, whether you were a saint or a demon. What are the positives of saving asari again?
Luc0s wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
Its not self perservation to kill off an entire species just to save the one you like more.
LOL this is not about which species you like more! This is about YOUR OWN SPECIES and another species and which one you would try to save first.
Volus Warlord wrote...
Indeed. The support for asari is largely superficial.
Ryzaki wrote...
RAF1940 wrote...
The Council is the ME equivalent of the United Nations.
[smilie]../../../../images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]
so sad but so true
Ferris95 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
Would the Council help? They certainly didn't lift the saviors of the Citadel with their colonies to "preserve galactic stability".
That was the Citadel. Not the entire galaxy and the fate of sentient life forever. Scale matters, not to mention that public sympathies would lie with humanity at this point. Protecting them would be a good move and help the Council's public image.
If the Citadel was lost it would be the same as not defeating the Reapers during ME3. So... same scale.
Maybe, but not in the eyes of the public. With the battle of the Citadel there was no information being released to the public about the Reapers, and it was fairly easily to cover up.
A mass full scale invasion by mechanical eldritch abominations from space? Harder to cover up, would be far easier to play up humanity's role in their defeat and how they had the Council's full support. Don't forget that we also have a spot on the Council now, I think we might be able to convince them to spare the few resources needed to decimitate a rag-tag army of space pirates.
Xilizhra wrote...
I hope she does find someone new; it's their way and I see no reason to change it.
RAF1940 wrote...
Tommy6860 wrote...
The thread is now an
Is it bad that this is actually the second time this picture has been posted?
Could the second person do more good than I?bobdooly wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
What she does after I die is of no concern to me. I hope she does find someone new; it's their way and I see no reason to change it.Volus Warlord wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Or the same thing could happen to asari under a human-controlled galaxy. In any case, those of my own flesh and blood are already all dead. Mindoir. And isn't part of your position that we should do well by our children?Get it through your head. They are NOT people. They are asari. They'll be getting their dance on as you fight, toil, and suffer. And your actions will make those of your own flesh and blood a mere historical footnote. Humanity would end up being something like the Quarians. Unwanted, undesirable, largely eradicated, and just "there," because you wanted to get it on with some asari trash. How irresponsible of you.
Children born of an asari essentially aren't even yours. They have nearly nothing to do with you. Their "relation" to you is more coincidence than anything. Especially with asari... haha.
Betray one's own race.. live as essentially a waste of genetic material.. raise "children" that you can never be sure are yours... and die like a dog. Your "children" will forget you soon and very soon for your partner's next suitor. They'll essentially have never known you, whether you were a saint or a demon. What are the positives of saving asari again?
What if your liver said "good luck" and jumped into another body? You'd probably be pretty pissed while the second person got a new liver to replace theirs. Yes, a life was saved, but at the cost at another. And the donor didn't have a choice in the matter.
Guest_Ferris95_*
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
bobdooly wrote...
Ferris95 wrote...
That was actual the bare minimum of Council support as they were downplaying the situation to avoid bad publicity and what not. If some species attacked humanity, the saviors of all sentient life everywhere, it wouldn't just be the bare minimum. It would be an extermination, the batarians would have no chance.
And for as much as I hate the Hegemony; their not idiots. Why attack your saviour and incure the wrath of the galaxy? Bad move in every aspect. Nothing to gain, everthing to lose.
Would the Council help? They certainly didn't lift the saviors of the Citadel with their colonies to "preserve galactic stability".
That was the Citadel. Not the entire galaxy and the fate of sentient life forever. Scale matters, not to mention that public sympathies would lie with humanity at this point. Protecting them would be a good move and help the Council's public image.
If the Citadel was lost it would be the same as not defeating the Reapers during ME3. So... same scale.
Maybe, but not in the eyes of the public. With the battle of the Citadel there was no information being released to the public about the Reapers, and it was fairly easily to cover up.
A mass full scale invasion by mechanical eldritch abominations from space? Harder to cover up, would be far easier to play up humanity's role in their defeat and how they had the Council's full support. Don't forget that we also have a spot on the Council now, I think we might be able to convince them to spare the few resources needed to decimitate a rag-tag army of space pirates.
Read: quick raid. Show up, take hostages. Get out before Citadel fleet can get past slaver's fleet.
Retour en haut
