No. My points has been consistently that I am not apply intrinsically greater value to any of the species, but my own species is valuable to me, specifically.While I agree that in a straight up "who would you rather save" scenario, you would obviously go with your own species since it's the only factor that can tip the scales, I can't agree that one sapient species is intrinsically more valuable than another. Does that make me intellectually inferior?
This issue I have is with people placing greater intrinsic value on species other than their own. As you stated, in a straight up "who would you rather save" scenario, the obvious choice is your own species. The problem is that with some people, they choose the other species out of either some misguided sense of altruism or devaluation of their own species.





Retour en haut




