Wulfram wrote...
Saphra Deden wrote...
Population growth is everything.
That's why Liberia, Burundi, Afghanistan, Western Sahara, East Timor, Niger, Eritrea, Uganda, DR Congo and the Palestinian territories are recognised as the 10 most successful states in the world.
Saphara's exageration not withstanding, population growth is
one of the key factors between powers of similar scales. Population growth is not only critical to economic/military potential at the moment, but also in maintaing a healthy economy.
By this time in 30/40 years, Russia and Europe and Japan are going to be having severe problems brought about by demographic imbalances of old-vs-young.
We need a high population to settle many worlds and craft a large and indispensible economy. 50 billion when we could have a 100 billion is not acceptable.
Why? How does that make our lives better?
For starters, it enables better economy, technological progression, security, and cultural diversity/sub-culture differentiation.
You have a better chance to afford better things that you like with more people who share your interests.
Anyway, we could breed far faster than the Asari seem to even if half of humanity were choosing Asari mates.
This I agree with...
And if we really thought it was important we could give incentives for having multiple children, or even limit access to contraceptives.
And this I don't, first and foremost for plausibility. Abortions have been going on for those who wanted them long before they were legal and accepted: it's like Russian efforts to end its alcohol epidemic.
Likewise, modern cultural trends seem to show that it's incredibly hard to raise birth rates once they've fallen. Incentives don't cut it by any means. (Again, see Russia. Or Singapore.)
The precedent for genocide was established by the Council long ago.
The Rachni were indoctrinated and refused to negotiate or surrender. While the Asari just want to have sex with us.
Saphara could also have been referring to the Quarians (Genocide by default), the Krogan (not only in the rebellions but in the re-application by Mordin), the Rachni again (Shepard).
Allowing an enemy, who actually wants to wipe us out now, to destroy their 2nd most powerful foes and gain control of vast reserves of eezo because of a concern about how many babies we might be having 2000 years in the future. Yes, that makes sense.
Besides the question of how much the Reapers need/would benefit from those reserves (if they already have enough with them, it's just a surplus), there are plenty of military-historical examples in which letting a greater threat focus on one area can enable and even improve the chances of an overall victory.
After all, while the Reapers are focusing on the Asari, that's X reapers who are not fighting the Turian fleets elsewhere. Whereas if you drive the Reapers away from Thessia, that's X-(however many were destroyed: potentially 0) Reapers that are now free to attack the Migrant Fleet/Turian homeworld/bombard Tuchanka/etc.
Depending on how things are going at the time, saving Thessia now may well endanger us all later.