Xilizhra wrote...
I always thought that being an Alliance hardliner was going to stay the ultimate Renegade position.
Why would you think that? At what point in ME2 does Renegade Shepard ever pine for the Alliance?
When given the opportunity to give the Alliance intel on Cerberus a Renegade will keep it for himself instead. Shepard even states that his Alliance dogtags aren't really his anymore.
Regardless, that's beside the point. Shepard can be loyal to the Alliance but still friendly with Cerberus (like say... Hackett).
My point is, every indication in ME2 and expanded universe material was that Cerberus was being set-up to be have a smaller role in ME3.
First we are told that Shepard and the Normandy were significant investments, that Cerberus invested
most of their resources in Lazarus project/Normandy.
At the end of Arrival if the Collector base was destroyed then Hackett will state that your ship is no longer a Cerberus ship. Similarly, your squadmates and crew will indicate that none of you are Cerberus anymore and that Cerberus is an enemy (Jacob voices this and on the base Miranda will resign if present).
At last, in Retribution we see Cerberus attacked and wounded by the turians. This leaves Cerberus weak and vulnerable with some of their best minds and agents in the Alliance elsewhere. They've lost many of their front corporations and bases, meaning a lot of their funding, manpower, and infrastructure.
So then I'm sure you can understand my confusion when Cerberus is revealed to be an enemy, and a major one at that with its own army.
It's an obvious last-minute decision by the development team that they probably hadn't even decided upon when Arrival was completed (as is implied by Hackett).