Bcuz wrote...
Wait, wait, wait.
The title doesn't seem to match up with what is currently being discussed.
"I am totally supportive of gays, but it shouldn't be allowed for story reasons! It can't possibly make sense!" is an argument I see a lot, but it's pretty easily debunked.
Tali and Garrus set a precedent for characters who were previously not LIs to become LIs. Not only were they not LIs, but they were aliens, and thus an unorthodox sexual preference. They had no hints of being sexually attracted to humans, just as many other characters have no hints of being sexually attracted to the same gender. Under that precedent established by Garrus and Tali, however, a character can become sexually interested in Shepard, even if its an unorthodox sexual preference, and even if there were no hints of such prior.
The argument is often made that someone is not against homosexuality or homophobic, but simply believe that a character changing their sexual preference, or someone not interested at all later becoming interested, is impossible. The Tali/Garrus precedent seems to solidly contradict that reasoning though.
I asked what reasons based on evidence, precidence, etcetera is there to actively fight against the existence of previously straight characters becoming s/s options in ME3. Someone brought up that, at the very least, Ashley is a previous LI, who was a straight, and couldn't be gay - because she believes in a God. The discussion has turned to validity of that as a reason. The rules of Ashley's religion, while also having a single God, may not be the same as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Also, even if the rules were the same, Ashley practices premerital sex, which is also not allowed under those religions - so its established that she doesn't follow the rules of Judeo-Christian religions, and thus not necessarily be averse to homosexuality. There's also the possibility of her being in the closet, in denial, or repressive. Many preachers against homosexuality have turned out to be homosexuals, for example.
Anyway, that's how the discussion has gotten to be where it is at the moment, from the original topic.
Considering those who were against s/s on principle of it being a character betrayal have not bothered to argue against the original argument, it appears people are grasping at any straw they can reach to justify fighting against s/s romance, when I think the real reason is they are just uncomfortable with it being in their game - want as little of it as possible - but don't want to openly say that's their reason.
Overall, the point is, it's looking like the only reason people vehemently oppose s/s romance, or oppose any aspect of it they possibly can, is that they simply don't like "the gays" instead of some non-homophobic or non-antigay reason.
Modifié par Rojahar, 23 août 2011 - 12:30 .