crimzontearz wrote...
Tommy6860 wrote...
crimzontearz wrote...
Boiny Bunny wrote...
I think it's safe to say that nobody here has a right to use the phrase 'vast majority of players' in the context of supporting their own views. This is garbage pulled out of thin air, and you know it. Don't do it.
There is plenty of evidence that a happy ending or a sad ending can be immensely popular in fiction. It really just comes down to how it is implemented, and whether it just feels 'tacked on' or not.
right
remember FO3? remember the huge ****storm the original end choice caused?
No sh!tstorm for me. What was wrong with it? One made choices (there was no one choice) during the game that could reflect what happened at the water purifier, as was defined during the ending commentary.
The original ending was simple......Either you die or she dies.....even tho you could have had, what 3 companions who were immune to radiations do the job for you with ZERO consequences
a lot of people were pissed (especially because regardless of the choice the game ended there with no post campaign play but that is not here nor there AND because in order to change the ending you had to buy a DLC).
The pissed off threads abounded on Forums everywhere
But that isn't the point, the ending, whether someone died or not, was not just as simple as dying, you still make a choice who lives or dies along with moral choices made in the game., without having the BS add-on..





Retour en haut







