68 réponses à ce sujet

[DarthSliver]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Boiny Bunny wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Quole wrote...

PS3 dosnt have ME1, so its always inferior.

For the time being, sure. Don't be surprised if the PS3 does eventually end up with (an equivalent of) Mass 1, though.

Very doubtful.  Microsoft have shown no signs whatsoever as of yet, of letting go of their exclusive console publishing rights to ME1 - and really, they have no need to.

I would've said the same before, but how Casey answered the question "Will there ever be a version of ME1 for PS3?" over at Comic-con just doesn't sit right with me. Add to that the fact that Microsoft seems adept at slowly losing all their non-first party exclusives, and well...

Yup they lost Bungie to Activision it seems, Halo 4 isnt even being made by Bungie from what i looked up.

[Theunsunghero26]

ME1 is still first party though, MS still owns Halo without Bungie, Just like Sony lost Insomniac.

[Jog0907]

they will be the same, I just hope they dont give the ones that buy the ps3 version more free content like they did with me2. I understand the reasons but it still bothered me

[Captain_Obvious]

If there is a graphical edge to either console, it's usually the 360. I noticed this with Fallout and New Vegas, both look better on the 360. PC has already made several hardware leaps above the current console gens. From what I've seen with screenshots of PC versions of ME2, it looks better on PC than either console, but not by much. I would imagine that another six months could provide a more noticeable difference. That being said, I'll stick with 360.

[Teddie Sage]

If the audio-sync glitch isn't fixed on ME3, I won't buy it.

[nuclearpengu1nn]

you get to mod 360 version

[Inspectre]

Captain_Obvious wrote...
 From what I've seen with screenshots of PC versions of ME2, it looks better on PC than either console, but not by much.

PC will look better by default, because you can set the internal resolution to 1920 x 1080 or higher.  Both consoles are stuck with just 1280 x 720.

jreezy wrote...

Ah thanks. You're talking about the 360 version right?

Nah, the PS3 version.  Less time for optimizing, perhaps.


Source for both answers.  You gotta scroll down aways, though.  Or ctrl + f  mass effect.

Modifié par Dragon XIX, 26 août 2011 - 01:27 .

[RAF1940]

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Elstraim wrote...

No and no.

[Blitzkrieg0811]

This thread is a flamewar waiting to happen

Modifié par Blitzkrieg0811, 26 août 2011 - 02:08 .

[Scudman_Slayer]

PS
the advantaage on the PS3 its not the graphics and yes the blurray discs for it the quality its still great and i love my PS3 and it has a free online and you don't need to pay to play online and some games like killzone 3 are WAY too heavy for a normal DVD disc to hold

XBOX 360
i like the XBOX i just...don'tl ike microsoft i don't trust them but still XBOX 360 is more of a online console because of all the things that you can do on XBOX live of course it doesn't hvae blurray and osme games may take multiple discs to complete it unlike the PS3 however the xbox has some great games still that still looks great on it

its a matter of opinion either if oyu like hte PS3 or the xbox or the PC better i take the PS3 because i trust sony more than i trust microsoft

[Kallianira]

O hve a PS3... so PS3... just like that!

[kglaser]

I vote for Xbox, simply because I've never had a PS3, so can't judge them.

[Scudman_Slayer]

Blitzkrieg0811 wrote...

This thread is a flamewar waiting to happen

i know right?

[LuvPoison]

PS3!!!!! ....Just because I have it!^.^V

[force192]

I own both but I prefer the PS3.