motomotogirl wrote...
Well to be honest I must recommend Wives and Daughters ... and ... Cranford (ellipses there to differentiate between the two lol) as the better adaptations of Gaskell novels, but North and South is very very good, too!
Wives and Daughters was good, and probably a more faithful adaptation of the novel, but it didn't have Richard Armitage. I was kinda meh on Cranford (both the book and the film adaptation). It's my fault for not enjoying it more. I've got serious reading comprehension issues, and found it a little hard to get through.
What made Wives and Daughters for me, sadly, was something the author herself never actually wrote: the ending. She died before the book was finished and the ending (from Roger's return onward) was pieced together from her notes. Why I like it: It's an "Aha! moment," an instant in time when the characters in the story finally perceive what the audience has been seeing all along. Niggles: none. The acting was awesome all around. I even mustered a little sympathy for Preston. A lot of sympathy for Preston, actually.
What made North and South for me was the atmosphere. Nothing was sugar-coated, and it all felt very vibrant. Richard Armitage was perfect in the role, even down to the accent (OK, he didn't have to try since that *is* his native accent, but props all the same). Niggles: Danielle Denby-Ashe is not always as sympathetic as she could be, and how, with RA sitting next to her, could she possibly look out the window? Sinead Cusak's accent grates. Yes, I know, she's Irish, not from the North, but it's still jarring... although she does a marvelous job with the role apart from that.
With Cranford, the best part was the interaction between Michael Gambon's character and Judy Dench's. But then, how do you go wrong with those two?
Sorry for the tangent.