89415 réponses à ce sujet

[Renmiri1]

LolaLei wrote...

Lol, well that didn't answer anything.

Well if you add his previous quotes it actually makes things more clear

[LolaLei]

Yeah I've seen that one.

Makes me wonder it there was a **** up in DotS when they mentioned Kirkwall, so they had to come up with an earlier replacement Kirkwall event to sort out the timeline?

[R2s Muse]

Renmiri1 wrote...

Oh mystery solved, I asked David Gaider about the Divine in DotS and it wasn't Justinia. Coulnd't have been her, the one in the movie was as inactive as the Grand Cleric on DA2

LOL So, this doesn't explain anything! According to the movie people, that was Justinia V. So, someone made a mistake.  Can you respond to him with the funimation link that says it's Justinia V??  I'm starting to think the movie people just frakked up, but David wasn't directly involved with the movie, so he could also just not know.

Or... just ask him flat out what year the movie took place!

[Danny Boy 7]

LolaLei wrote...

Lol, well that didn't answer anything.

At least we know it's not Justinia.

[Danny Boy 7]

You know I'm not normally one for lovey dovey romantic scenes, but this...I like.

http://theoneknight....entro-196394757

[Danny Boy 7]

charlottecorday wrote...

Ok so that wasn't supposed to be Justinia? I'm so confused, I think I may need to rewatch DotS.

It's apparently the person before her, I think. She might be the woman who elected Justinia. Makes me wonder why though.

[R2s Muse]

R2s Muse wrote...

Renmiri1 wrote...

Oh mystery solved, I asked David Gaider about the Divine in DotS and it wasn't Justinia. Coulnd't have been her, the one in the movie was as inactive as the Grand Cleric on DA2

LOL So, this doesn't explain anything! According to the movie people, that was Justinia V. So, someone made a mistake.  Can you respond to him with the funimation link that says it's Justinia V??  I'm starting to think the movie people just frakked up, but David wasn't directly involved with the movie, so he could also just not know.

Or... just ask him flat out what year the movie took place!

Interesting. The movie does seem to call her only "the Divine" in the credits and in most of the dialogue. Mike Laidlaw in the behind the scenes says explicitly, however, that we might see the Divine again because all these characters "are canon". LOL  If it's Beatrix, hard to see her again since she died in 9:34.

So, best scenario is that the movie creators got it wrong.  But, in any event, it still doesn't tell us when the movie took place. If it's Beatrix, now all we know is that the movie took place between 9:21 and 9:34.

[rapscallioness]

Ummm, you knoooowww, I think DotS just effed up the dates. The movie ppl.

They say it was Justinia. She's old. Even that bartender guy in DA2 commented on the fact that the Divine was getting really old and had not named a successor yet. And how that would cause lotsa problems if she died w/out doing that.

This goes the same for that Kirkwall comment. It was s aid in such a way and situation that the only logical conclusion would be that it was referring to the Chantry blow up. That one Templar guy said it. I see him as the type that would luv for Templars to rule everything.

The only thing that makes any sense is that DotS was intended to be right after DA2, but before Cass interrogates Varric. And shows Cassandra starting her pilgrimage.

I think the movie ppl just dated it wrong, or something. The DA team were not directly involved, if at all. I think Gaider is just...shuffling papers with this one.

[Danny Boy 7]

R2s Muse wrote...

R2s Muse wrote...

Renmiri1 wrote...

Oh mystery solved, I asked David Gaider about the Divine in DotS and it wasn't Justinia. Coulnd't have been her, the one in the movie was as inactive as the Grand Cleric on DA2

LOL So, this doesn't explain anything! According to the movie people, that was Justinia V. So, someone made a mistake.  Can you respond to him with the funimation link that says it's Justinia V??  I'm starting to think the movie people just frakked up, but David wasn't directly involved with the movie, so he could also just not know.

Or... just ask him flat out what year the movie took place!

Interesting. The movie does seem to call her only "the Divine" in the credits and in most of the dialogue. Mike Laidlaw in the behind the scenes says explicitly, however, that we might see the Divine again because all these characters "are canon". LOL  If it's Beatrix, hard to see her again since she died in 9:34.

So, best scenario is that the movie creators got it wrong.  But, in any event, it still doesn't tell us when the movie took place. If it's Beatrix, now all we know is that the movie took place between 9:21 and 9:34.

I feel bad for the guy or girl who has to keep this stuff straight lol. Really the movie was great, but it's impossible to keep dates and stuff straight when you work with third party companies. 

[rapscallioness]

Renmiri1 wrote...

LolaLei wrote...

Lol, well that didn't answer anything.

Well if you add his previous quotes it actually makes things more clear

mmm, but then i see this. in this answer he sounds much more certain.

so..nvm. it's just a bowl of spaghetti.

[Renmiri1]

rapscallioness wrote...

Ummm, you knoooowww, I think DotS just effed up the dates. The movie ppl.

They say it was Justinia. She's old. Even that bartender guy in DA2 commented on the fact that the Divine was getting really old and had not named a successor yet. And how that would cause lotsa problems if she died w/out doing that.

This goes the same for that Kirkwall comment. It was s aid in such a way and situation that the only logical conclusion would be that it was referring to the Chantry blow up. That one Templar guy said it. I see him as the type that would luv for Templars to rule everything.

The only thing that makes any sense is that DotS was intended to be right after DA2, but before Cass interrogates Varric. And shows Cassandra starting her pilgrimage.

I think the movie ppl just dated it wrong, or something. The DA team were not directly involved, if at all. I think Gaider is just...shuffling papers with this one.

Is confusing because the movie shows Cassandra like 10 years younger than DA2, when she was just starting as seeker, with a very old (and inactive) Divine that leaves most of the day to day decisions to the Orlais Grand Cleric. The Exiled Prince DLC  and Asunder have a young kickass Divine that hires Leliana - not the Orlais Grand Cleric - as her right hand.

So the movie and Varric's interrogation can't be only 1-2 years apart.

Yet funimation says it is Justine and mentions Kirkwall, which seems to bring the movie to the 1-2 years beteween Meredith's death and Varric's interrogation. 

I put both pics on my tumblr, if anyone wants a quick reference
http://renmiri.tumbl...ker-takes-place

Modifié par Renmiri1, 29 janvier 2013 - 09:17 .

[R2s Muse]

Renmiri1 wrote...

rapscallioness wrote...

Ummm, you knoooowww, I think DotS just effed up the dates. The movie ppl.

They say it was Justinia. She's old. Even that bartender guy in DA2 commented on the fact that the Divine was getting really old and had not named a successor yet. And how that would cause lotsa problems if she died w/out doing that.

This goes the same for that Kirkwall comment. It was s aid in such a way and situation that the only logical conclusion would be that it was referring to the Chantry blow up. That one Templar guy said it. I see him as the type that would luv for Templars to rule everything.

The only thing that makes any sense is that DotS was intended to be right after DA2, but before Cass interrogates Varric. And shows Cassandra starting her pilgrimage.

I think the movie ppl just dated it wrong, or something. The DA team were not directly involved, if at all. I think Gaider is just...shuffling papers with this one.

Is confusing because the movie shows Cassandra like 10 years younger than DA2, when she was just starting as seeker, with a very old (and inactive) Divine that leaves most of the day to day decisions to the Orlais Grand Cleric. The Exiled Prince DLC  and Asunder have a young kickass Divine that hires Leliana - not the Orlais Grand Cleric - as her right hand.

So the movie and Varric's interrogation can't be only 1-2 years apart.

Yet funimation says it is Justine and mentions Kirkwall, which seems to bring the movie to the 1-2 years beteween Meredith's death and Varric's interrogation. 

I put both pics on my tumblr, if anyone wants a quick reference
http://renmiri.tumbl...ker-takes-place

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if the Funimation folks originally tried to place it between 9:37 and 9:40 and later had to change it. It all just makes no sense. Cassandra does seem young and in training. I don't know that I'd call Justinia young and kickass (since she was Dorothea in Leliana's song), but definitely younger than death's doorstep.

*sigh* Maybe that's why they won't just tell us flat out when it took place! LOL

[deuce985]

Anyone in here have the handle @radekoheqi on Twitter. Trying to figure out who this is following me lol.

[R2s Muse]

So, Renmiri, I cribbed your idea and just asked David straight out about the date. You were right, Dawn of the Seeker takes place immediately after the Perrin rebellion, in 9:22!



Of course... now the real speculation begins. How old is Cassandra?? Now I'm think she's got to be really young in the movie. If she were Templar recruit young, 15-16, then in DA2 she'd be 33-34.

[littlenikki]

deuce985 wrote...

Anyone in here have the handle @radekoheqi on Twitter. Trying to figure out who this is following me lol.

Might just be a random person, looking for a follow in return (I hate those...) Who are you on Twitter, so I can follow you?

[rapscallioness]

Okay you guys rock!

9:22 Dragon.

It was indeed Beatrix and not Justinia. So, Gaider was not just shuffling papers!....

edit: wow, so it's been like 20 years? Leli did not come on board until Justinia? Right? The Left Hand and all that.

Modifié par rapscallioness, 30 janvier 2013 - 12:27 .

[Newschmoo]

R2s Muse wrote...

So, Renmiri, I cribbed your idea and just asked David straight out about the date. You were right, Dawn of the Seeker takes place immediately after the Perrin rebellion, in 9:22!



Of course... now the real speculation begins. How old is Cassandra?? Now I'm think she's got to be really young in the movie. If she were Templar recruit young, 15-16, then in DA2 she'd be 33-34.

If she is that age in DA2, then she looks really good.  Pixels always age really well!  No frown lines or anything!

[rapscallioness]

it's the cheekbones. the cheekbones just hold everything else up. Lol!

[deuce985]

littlenikki wrote...

deuce985 wrote...

Anyone in here have the handle @radekoheqi on Twitter. Trying to figure out who this is following me lol.

Might just be a random person, looking for a follow in return (I hate those...) Who are you on Twitter, so I can follow you?

Same as my BSN.

deuce985

[Newschmoo]

rapscallioness wrote...

it's the cheekbones. the cheekbones just hold everything else up. Lol!

How I wish I had those cheekbones!

[CuriousArtemis]

Newschmoo wrote...

If she is that age in DA2, then she looks really good.  Pixels always age really well!  No frown lines or anything!

She looks her age actually. I'm 32 and don't have any "frown lines" or ... not sure what you mean by anything. But I always thought she was in her 30s.

[Newschmoo]

Sorry, I am never good at guessing people's ages. I thought she was in her mid to late 20s.

I developed slight frown lines in my early 30s, probably through too much concentration!

[R2s Muse]

motomotogirl wrote...

Newschmoo wrote...

If she is that age in DA2, then she looks really good.  Pixels always age really well!  No frown lines or anything!

She looks her age actually. I'm 32 and don't have any "frown lines" or ... not sure what you mean by anything. But I always thought she was in her 30s.

Agree, I would put her in her 30s, too (like Cullen). But then... that's much younger than I expected during DotS. I mean, she's 16 years old and becoming the Champion of Orlais? Wow. *cough*overachiever*cough*

edit: And, keeping in mind that Danny already asked MLaw if Cassandra was closer to 40, and he said no. So, she really must have been that young.

Modifié par R2s Muse, 30 janvier 2013 - 12:57 .

[R2s Muse]

These are hilarious!! Happy Valentine's day! Bwahaha!

http://spicyshimmy.t...ost/41800897327

by spicyshimmy

Modifié par R2s Muse, 30 janvier 2013 - 12:56 .