Aller au contenu

Photo

The Official Knight-Captain Cullen Discussion thread 2.0.


89415 réponses à ce sujet

#36826
Jean

Jean
  • Members
  • 5 813 messages
I'm sure when news comes people will all flock back if it dies.
So many people out in the forums seem so.. twitchy. About anything and everything. Hopefully there's something soon.

Definitely like staying in single character threads and talking about, well, anything. Compared to anywhere else in the forum, anyway.

Modifié par Batteries, 24 février 2013 - 07:16 .


#36827
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

Batteries wrote...

Definitely like staying in single character threads and talking about, well, anything. Compared to anywhere else in the forum, anyway.


Yeah totally. Boredom leads me to DA3 forums lately while waiting for things to download. The trolls and troll threads barely get a twitch of a smile out of me now. 

#36828
Jean

Jean
  • Members
  • 5 813 messages
There's so little to talk about now, I think some people just want to argue just to make conversation lul

But I guess to keep it somewhat on Cullen

Posted Image

At least "Cullen" looks more concept art like here and less "...did they paste his head onto the clothing?"

almost tempted to make a "What can Dragon Age learn from Call of Duty"? thread to match all the rest

Modifié par Batteries, 24 février 2013 - 07:46 .


#36829
Ilidan_DA

Ilidan_DA
  • Polish Community Moderators
  • 3 983 messages
Posted Image

#36830
shepard1038

shepard1038
  • Members
  • 1 960 messages
I heard David Gaider say that romances weren't going to impact the storyline. So does that mean that companions who are important to the plot are going to be un-romancable? Can someone clarify this.

Modifié par shepard1038, 24 février 2013 - 09:05 .


#36831
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

I honestly think our poor thread might die before we get any real news <_<


I might die before we get any news lol, first a sinus infection, now, the flu.....

#36832
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages

shepard1038 wrote...

Did Bioware said we weren't going to have important companions? I heard David Gaider say that romances weren't going to impact the storyline. So does that mean that companions who are important to the plot are going to be un-romancable? Can someone clarify this.


I dunno the context, but I think what he means is that who you romance won't somehow change the plot of the game. Similar to...well all BioWare games really. Possibly in retaliation about him wanting to front load romance or some other nonsense.

#36833
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages
Yeah whatever Mr. DG. This is what I hear when devs speak now: "Wah wah wah, wah wah, wah. Wah wah wah. Wah wah, wah." 

JUST SHOW ME SOMETHING, MISTER!!! :lol: 

#36834
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

Batteries wrote...

almost tempted to make a "What can Dragon Age learn from Call of Duty"? thread to match all the rest


Um you would be my new best friend if you did this. 

:P

#36835
Jean

Jean
  • Members
  • 5 813 messages
I already feel bad enough for the mods, I don't have the heart to make it worse. </3

#36836
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

shepard1038 wrote...

I heard David Gaider say that romances weren't going to impact the storyline. So does that mean that companions who are important to the plot are going to be un-romancable? Can someone clarify this.


I don't think I've seen that one, where did he post it?

#36837
R2s Muse

R2s Muse
  • Members
  • 19 876 messages

LolaLei wrote...

shepard1038 wrote...

I heard David Gaider say that romances weren't going to impact the storyline. So does that mean that companions who are important to the plot are going to be un-romancable? Can someone clarify this.


I don't think I've seen that one, where did he post it?

Yeah, I think I'd have to see the whole context since he has said SO VERY MANY things about romances now. LOL I haven't gotten this direct implication unless it's something he's said recently. I know he seems rather vehement that making romances more important than they have been is like putting the cart before the horse; that it's just not what they do. I guess he also said something about the approval system not being linked to any one issue this time and not being a gateway to certain, I dunno, actions or plot points? Not sure I fully understand the last point, but I'd have to go back and look at the exact wording.

#36838
R2s Muse

R2s Muse
  • Members
  • 19 876 messages
Oooh, this is pretty. It's also just a sketch, so a final version will be forthcoming!

[DA3] Cullen by MellorianJ

Posted Image

#36839
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages
Oooo pretty!

... Still far too many clothes on that man though!

#36840
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages

LolaLei wrote...

Oooo pretty!

... Still far too many clothes on that man though!


Geez down tiger. *pulls on the leash*

#36841
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages
Btw thanks Moto for commenting in my thread. You to BattleBloodMage :D

#36842
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

LolaLei wrote...

Oooo pretty!

... Still far too many clothes on that man though!


Geez down tiger. *pulls on the leash*


RAWR! :lol:

I didn't literally mean that he need no clothes (although that would be a bonus), what I actually meant was that he looks swamped in all that material and fur.

#36843
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

Btw thanks Moto for commenting in my thread. You to BattleBloodMage :D


You made a thread? 

#36844
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages

LolaLei wrote...

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

LolaLei wrote...

Oooo pretty!

... Still far too many clothes on that man though!


Geez down tiger. *pulls on the leash*


RAWR! :lol:

I didn't literally mean that he need no clothes (although that would be a bonus), what I actually meant was that he looks swamped in all that material and fur.


....Lola, c'mon, it's me.....we know each other....

:P

#36845
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages

LolaLei wrote...

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

Btw thanks Moto for commenting in my thread. You to BattleBloodMage :D


You made a thread? 


DLC Companion: Yes and No's

#36846
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

Yeah whatever Mr. DG. This is what I hear when devs speak now: "Wah wah wah, wah wah, wah. Wah wah wah. Wah wah, wah." 


Like this? 



:lol:

#36847
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

LolaLei wrote...

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

Btw thanks Moto for commenting in my thread. You to BattleBloodMage :D


You made a thread? 


DLC Companion: Yes and No's




I'll go have a look!

#36848
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages
Thanks Lola :D

#36849
LolaLei

LolaLei
  • Members
  • 33 006 messages

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

Thanks Lola :D


Left a comment!

#36850
Danny Boy 7

Danny Boy 7
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages

LolaLei wrote...

Danny Boy 7 wrote...

Thanks Lola :D


Left a comment!


Yeah I saw, good stuff! So you have no issue with what type of character it is? Like if it's a returning character? Not necesarilly a companion, but someone like Cullen or Lia?