Modifié par LolaLei, 22 mai 2013 - 05:27 .
The Official Knight-Captain Cullen Discussion thread 2.0.
#45551
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:27
#45552
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:31
LolaLei wrote...
They "came to Thedas"? Where were they before that?
Jersey.
#45553
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:32
Conquerors in our world often boosted their legitimacy by coopting local iconography. That could be a very obvious thing for them to do, borrow ancient creator symbology for their "new" religion. Particularly if no one remembers it. Except the dwarves. Since they remember everything. LOLbrushyourteeth wrote...
Like if we suddenly found out that a modern-day religious icon had been used in common between historical elite that didn't have much to do with that particular religion. Does that mean that someone who already identified with that symbol jumped on the religious bandwagon and rode it to power? (Archon Hessarion or Emperor Drakon, for examples?)
#45554
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:32
LOL I do like his undies, tho. I'd buy those underoos!LolaLei wrote...
I hope against hope that Cullen doesn't look like that in DA3. That guys face creeps me out.
#45555
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:33
rapscallioness wrote...
LolaLei wrote...
They "came to Thedas"? Where were they before that?
Jersey.
Oh Maker!
#45556
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:39
R2s Muse wrote...
Conquerors in our world often boosted their legitimacy by coopting local iconography. That could be a very obvious thing for them to do, borrow ancient creator symbology for their "new" religion. Particularly if no one remembers it. Except the dwarves. Since they remember everything. LOLbrushyourteeth wrote...
Like if we suddenly found out that a modern-day religious icon had been used in common between historical elite that didn't have much to do with that particular religion. Does that mean that someone who already identified with that symbol jumped on the religious bandwagon and rode it to power? (Archon Hessarion or Emperor Drakon, for examples?)
Yes, this is my understanding as well. From what I understand, symbols and even religious locations have been coopted. Heck, even the gods themselves have been coopted.
I think it makes it an "easier" transition for a belief system. Something borrowed. Something blue, I guess.
Yeah, the guys face is creepy-ish. Idk, it's just something abt. it. Altho, I don't wanna knock the artist cuz I can't even do that much. You'd be looking at Cullen the stick figure version. Rawr....
I would luv the small clothes, tho. Ha! Some kick butt panties w/Templar symbol right on the lid of the cookie jar.
Or another symbol.
#45557
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:42
R2s Muse wrote...
Conquerors in our world often boosted their legitimacy by coopting local iconography. That could be a very obvious thing for them to do, borrow ancient creator symbology for their "new" religion. Particularly if no one remembers it. Except the dwarves. Since they remember everything. LOLbrushyourteeth wrote...
Like if we suddenly found out that a modern-day religious icon had been used in common between historical elite that didn't have much to do with that particular religion. Does that mean that someone who already identified with that symbol jumped on the religious bandwagon and rode it to power? (Archon Hessarion or Emperor Drakon, for examples?)
I think this is definitely the most likely explanation. Barring the "it was a mistake" theory, of course.
I still would really like to know more, if that's the case, though. What did it mean before? Who used it? How did it come to be adopted by the Chantry?
I really wouldn't be surprised to find that the Chant turned out to be a big ol' whopper someone used to manipulate others. Even Andraste used the story to gain support for the rebellion (even if she was earnest). The only thing about that that still boggles my mind is that fade spirits believe in the Maker. If anything's enough to convince me that he exists (whether the Chantry's right about him or not) -- it's that.
#45558
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:48
Good point about the spirits. It still begs the question of "what" the Maker is... but I don't really want to know!brushyourteeth wrote...
R2s Muse wrote...
Conquerors in our world often boosted their legitimacy by coopting local iconography. That could be a very obvious thing for them to do, borrow ancient creator symbology for their "new" religion. Particularly if no one remembers it. Except the dwarves. Since they remember everything. LOLbrushyourteeth wrote...
Like if we suddenly found out that a modern-day religious icon had been used in common between historical elite that didn't have much to do with that particular religion. Does that mean that someone who already identified with that symbol jumped on the religious bandwagon and rode it to power? (Archon Hessarion or Emperor Drakon, for examples?)
I think this is definitely the most likely explanation. Barring the "it was a mistake" theory, of course.
I still would really like to know more, if that's the case, though. What did it mean before? Who used it? How did it come to be adopted by the Chantry?
I really wouldn't be surprised to find that the Chant turned out to be a big ol' whopper someone used to manipulate others. Even Andraste used the story to gain support for the rebellion (even if she was earnest). The only thing about that that still boggles my mind is that fade spirits believe in the Maker. If anything's enough to convince me that he exists (whether the Chantry's right about him or not) -- it's that.
On the symbology... you know, frankly, I almost get a disconnect between that and the game/lore, to be honest. The wiki has all these pics of heraldry that come in the game files that are never really used elsewhere. For example, this supposedly is the templar heraldry:
HOLD THE PRESSES!! HA! Look at the Carta dwarfs "heraldry"!! (mystery solved?)
Modifié par R2s Muse, 22 mai 2013 - 05:50 .
#45559
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:49
I could see a concept of the Maker existing in the Fade at this point simply cuz ppl in Thedas have put so much energy of belief into it. The concept could very well manifest in sum form in the Fade.
Or, there really is a Maker. I'd be down w/that, too. Though it's not nearly as intriguing an idea to me. Not the same dramaz, and all that.
#45560
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:51
But still.....
#45561
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:52
R2s Muse wrote...
On the symbology... you know, frankly, I almost get a disconnect between that and the game/lore, to be honest. The wiki has all these pics of heraldry that come in the game files that are never really used elsewhere. For example, this supposedly is the templar heraldry:
HOLD THE PRESSES!! HA! Look at the Carta dwarfs "heraldry"!!
WHOA!!!!
So, what, does that mean it was a symbol commonly used by dwarves, for some reason (the carta and the upper class aren't supposed to be publicly linked)? Do they suddenly love the sun? Is it a cave spider with too many legs?
Or was one of the first Inquisitors a former carta dwarf? Are the artists just lazy? My mind can't even...
#45562
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:54
#45563
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:55
Edit: I know it's probably digging for sth that may not exist but it would be great if the symbol had some ancient roots and deeper meaning.
Modifié par neonmoth, 22 mai 2013 - 05:56 .
#45564
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:55
Man, everybody luvs that symbol. It is purty.
#45565
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:57
Modifié par rapscallioness, 22 mai 2013 - 05:58 .
#45566
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 05:57
That's all I have. And it's so stupid that I'm only posting it so that you guys know how not-serious I am about trying to even understand this thing. LOL
If only we could know that it wasn't a mistake. How infuriating!! Get you sh*t together, Bioware!!
#45567
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:01
I'm thinking we may need to dovetail this into sum Cullen themed talk.
Uh.....I think if Cullen were in DA3 and we are indeed Inquisitors--it would very much mesh for him.
With the Inquisitors basically founding the Templars. It would be a legit undertaking for him. Get back to the roots of Templar beliefs. (that's all i got)
#45568
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:06
#45569
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:08
#45570
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:09
#45571
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:12
OR, Stonehammer, being the first Paragon, worked his way into power by being a Carta man and founded the first noble house, but kept the gear for fun. And it really should have been photoshopped out for the book.
OR it means something and we don't know what.
#45572
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:12
bvwlkjfklsdjf oijklwnkls dhf;sdjf ksjflkjflsjdk grr.
#45573
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:13
LolaLei wrote...
What DA2 song would be best for Cassandra's intro to my speculation video? I can't use the Florence & The Machine - "I'm Not Calling You a Liar" because of copyright 'n' ****.
What kind of mood are you going for?
#45574
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:14
#45575
Posté 22 mai 2013 - 06:14
Apparently the art in the book is all from some big folder they just dump all their concept art into. So that's why it's a grab bag of art from all the games.brushyourteeth wrote...
So it's possible that the portrait of Stonehammer was concept art from DA:O (not sure why they'd bother to paint him, but I admittedly don't know squat about the game developing process) and all the artists had was this one symbol for dwarves so they stuck it onto his belt and it really should have been photoshopped out for the book.
OR, Stonehammer, being the first Paragon, worked his way into power by being a Carta man and founded the first noble house, but kept the gear for fun. And it really should have been photoshopped out for the book.
OR it means something and we don't know what.
Someone should ask someone about that pesky sun!





Retour en haut




