Aller au contenu

Photo

The Official Knight-Captain Cullen Discussion thread 2.0.


89415 réponses à ce sujet

#61626
Adela

Adela
  • Members
  • 6 633 messages
thought this was interesting

Allan Schumacher wrote...

ManchesterUnitedFan1 wrote...

Parmida wrote...

They don't teleport. It's a Haste spell. They're basically running in great speed. I think it was David who said this.


Funny, in DA:O and DA2 the haste spell didnt make your run faster than the speed of light.

Besides, Allan confirmed that she is indeed teleporting.


Sorry but i am not really a gigantic lore specialist so it is a bit misleading to just state thatbi confirmed this. Vivienne zipped ahead a short distance in combat and if there is a better in game lore explanation then that is more likely accurate.

I would prefer to not dwell too much into semantics on it. Vivienne, at this time, has an ability to jump a short distance in a very short period of time.



#61627
Phate Phoenix

Phate Phoenix
  • Members
  • 4 339 messages
Alright, I saw that you guys were discussing companions and their classes earlier, so I have to jump in with my own thoughts.

WARRIOR
1) Cullen
2) Cassandra
3) Grey Warden
4) Iron Bull

ROGUE
4) Varric
6) Cole
7) Sera

MAGE
8) Vivienne
9) Dorian (Chill?)

I have Cole as a rogue because the leaked survey had the actual word "ROGUE" in Cole's bio. I think it's a good spread, giving you the ability to make Tanks and Off-Takes, Rogues and Archers, and Mages of any kind of mass-destruction.

Also, howdy~

I find it humourous my first post in the Cullen thread is primarily not about Cullen. But you guys have some of the best conversations on the whole site, it seems. :D

Modifié par Phate Phoenix, 01 septembre 2013 - 08:05 .


#61628
Adela

Adela
  • Members
  • 6 633 messages
and this

Allan Schumacher wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Mr. Allen, can you clarify about Qunari mages? Mr. Laidlaw responded to my tweet asking about it, and said yes, that we can, but later a person at the PAX panel said that Qunari could not be mages.


They just mentioned on the races panel that you can be a mage but you wouldn't be a sarebaas (i totally butchered that i think....)



#61629
Chanda

Chanda
  • Members
  • 3 195 messages
I am overwhelmed by all the awesomeness. The only thing that would make it even more awesome is confirmation of Cullen with companion/LI status.

#61630
carine

carine
  • Members
  • 960 messages

Chanda wrote...

I am overwhelmed by all the awesomeness. The only thing that would make it even more awesome is confirmation of Cullen with companion/LI status.


This...

Even if he's not a companion/LI, I know I'll enjoy the game. BUT it would be infinitely more amazing if he was both :P

#61631
Chanda

Chanda
  • Members
  • 3 195 messages
My thought Leliana being a companion, especially if she was your Grey Warden's LI in Origins:

They could flag her so that if you didn't romance her in Origins, she's free to be a romance in Inquisition. However, if you DID romance her, her flag would change, and she would be the friendship type like Aveline. Which could allow her to still be a companion without any LI conflicts of interest.

#61632
carine

carine
  • Members
  • 960 messages

Chanda wrote...

My thought Leliana being a companion, especially if she was your Grey Warden's LI in Origins:

They could flag her so that if you didn't romance her in Origins, she's free to be a romance in Inquisition. However, if you DID romance her, her flag would change, and she would be the friendship type like Aveline. Which could allow her to still be a companion without any LI conflicts of interest.


I honestly don't think they'll make Leliana a companion or LI.

DG said something about not making you "cheat" on your LI from a previous game, so even *if* she's a companion I doubt she'll be a love interest. That would mean that people who romanced her in Origins would lose out on a love interest in DA:I and only have three options (if they go with the usual two of each sex). 

#61633
R2s Muse

R2s Muse
  • Members
  • 19 876 messages
Welcome! And, yeah, that's pretty close to what my own list would be, for similar reasons (like, Cole's description which I just mentioned a few posts back). I still wonder about Cullen, Flaily hands, Trident Guy, Scribe Girl, Cole, as companions. But, I think there's no knowing which concept art pic corresponds to what name, let alone who's a party member and who's an "Important NPC" ala Morrigan at this point.

Phate Phoenix wrote...

Alright, I saw that you guys were discussing companions and their classes earlier, so I have to jump in with my own thoughts.

WARRIOR
1) Cullen
2) Cassandra
3) Grey Warden
4) Iron Bull

ROGUE
4) Varric
6) Cole
7) Sera

MAGE
8) Vivienne
9) Dorian (Chill?)

I have Cole as a rogue because the leaked survey had the actual word "ROGUE" in Cole's bio. I think it's a good spread, giving you the ability to make Tanks and Off-Takes, Rogues and Archers, and Mages of any kind of mass-destruction.

Also, howdy~

I find it humourous my first post in the Cullen thread is primarily not about Cullen. But you guys have some of the best conversations on the whole site, it seems. :D



#61634
meanieweenie

meanieweenie
  • Members
  • 3 502 messages

Phate Phoenix wrote...

Also, howdy~

I find it humourous my first post in the Cullen thread is primarily not about Cullen. But you guys have some of the best conversations on the whole site, it seems. :D

Howdy back at ya! Pull up a seat. It gets weird in here... just how we like it. Image IPB

#61635
Kidd

Kidd
  • Members
  • 3 667 messages

Phate Phoenix wrote...

Alright, I saw that you guys were discussing companions and their classes earlier, so I have to jump in with my own thoughts.

WARRIOR
1) Cullen
2) Cassandra
3) Grey Warden
4) Iron Bull

ROGUE
4) Varric
6) Cole
7) Sera

MAGE
8) Vivienne
9) Dorian (Chill?)

I have Cole as a rogue because the leaked survey had the actual word "ROGUE" in Cole's bio. I think it's a good spread, giving you the ability to make Tanks and Off-Takes, Rogues and Archers, and Mages of any kind of mass-destruction.

Also, howdy~

I find it humourous my first post in the Cullen thread is primarily not about Cullen. But you guys have some of the best conversations on the whole site, it seems. :D

That's a cast of 3 women in a group of 9 though =( That can't be how it turns out, can it?

And welcome! I'm pretty new myself. This thread is so full of all kinds of awesomeness and speculation you kinda don't need the rest of the board ;) Just keep F5ing or there will be 10 new pages before you know it!

#61636
R2s Muse

R2s Muse
  • Members
  • 19 876 messages

carine wrote...

Chanda wrote...

My thought Leliana being a companion, especially if she was your Grey Warden's LI in Origins:

They could flag her so that if you didn't romance her in Origins, she's free to be a romance in Inquisition. However, if you DID romance her, her flag would change, and she would be the friendship type like Aveline. Which could allow her to still be a companion without any LI conflicts of interest.


I honestly don't think they'll make Leliana a companion or LI.

DG said something about not making you "cheat" on your LI from a previous game, so even *if* she's a companion I doubt she'll be a love interest. That would mean that people who romanced her in Origins would lose out on a love interest in DA:I and only have three options (if they go with the usual two of each sex). 

Yeah, I was just going to say this. DG  has definitely confirmed you won't be romancing anyone you could romance in the past. They could make it a toggle/conditional, but the way DG talked about it sounded like he didn't even want to go there.

I don't know that that's reason for her not to be a party member... but my gut says she won't be based on the way the GI articles talked about her.

#61637
R2s Muse

R2s Muse
  • Members
  • 19 876 messages

KiddDaBeauty wrote...

 This thread is so full of all kinds of awesomeness and speculation you kinda don't need the rest of the board ;) Just keep F5ing or there will be 10 new pages before you know it!

Bwahaha! :lol: Sad... but true.

#61638
carine

carine
  • Members
  • 960 messages

R2s Muse wrote...

carine wrote...

I honestly don't think they'll make Leliana a companion or LI.

DG said something about not making you "cheat" on your LI from a previous game, so even *if* she's a companion I doubt she'll be a love interest. That would mean that people who romanced her in Origins would lose out on a love interest in DA:I and only have three options (if they go with the usual two of each sex). 

Yeah, I was just going to say this. DG  has definitely confirmed you won't be romancing anyone you could romance in the past. They could make it a toggle/conditional, but the way DG talked about it sounded like he didn't even want to go there.

I don't know that that's reason for her not to be a party member... but my gut says she won't be based on the way the GI articles talked about her.


Yeah, I'm not saying that's the reason why she's not a companion -- I think that there are better reasons for her to not show up as a party member, but if she happened to be one she would not be an LI.

I think there will, however, be one more female party member. I'm not sure who will get taken out (please not Cullen). I'm thinking Iron Bull/Trident Guy might be agents/important characters but not companions.

Kind of hoping for a female dwarf to be honest.

#61639
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

R2s Muse wrote...

UPDATE ON FAN RECORDINGS:

David Gaider ‏: Evidently explicit permission was given for folks to share the PAX panel on social media. So be it. I retract my grousing. :)


Aww, I feel sorry for him lol Grumpy Bear had to apologize. *huggles the DG*

I do still understand not wanting "the masses" to see the footage though. I had to bite my tongue to keep from listing off my own criticisms. It's in my nature... but it's done out of love and anxiety concerning the game, which has meant so much to me. But I have to remind myself that it's not really the time to complain... especially on their own board.

AND... I don't think I talk about the stuff I like enough. Which one can assume is virtually everything I'm not complaining about lol

#61640
Phate Phoenix

Phate Phoenix
  • Members
  • 4 339 messages

R2s Muse wrote...

Welcome! And, yeah, that's pretty close to what my own list would be, for similar reasons (like, Cole's description which I just mentioned a few posts back). I still wonder about Cullen, Flaily hands, Trident Guy, Scribe Girl, Cole, as companions. But, I think there's no knowing which concept art pic corresponds to what name, let alone who's a party member and who's an "Important NPC" ala Morrigan at this point.


I'm nowhere near a hundred percent sure Cullen will be a companion, but hope lives eternal and all that. :lol: I'd bet that Scribe Girl is a Traynor/Kelly character, used to manage all our Keeps. Flaily Hands has a bit of a Rogue look to him, so, if we say he's the rogue instead of Cole, that might work.

If there was one person from my list I'd bet they remove, it would be Cole. Him I see easily being a DLC character.

Also, if you look at Chill and the Trident Guy, I think they're wearing the same type of clothes (furry!). Perhaps they made Trident Guy into Chill. Wasn't there was suggestion they'd made non-human characters human to better appeal to the audience?

ALSO: This place is friggin' welcoming. :wub:

Modifié par Phate Phoenix, 01 septembre 2013 - 08:26 .


#61641
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

carine wrote...

I think there will, however, be one more female party member. I'm not sure who will get taken out (please not Cullen). I'm thinking Iron Bull/Trident Guy might be agents/important characters but not companions.

Kind of hoping for a female dwarf to be honest.


I can see them doing three females IF they make sure they create three well-rounded "real" women (which I know they will; they're super conscious about sexism and gaming), AND give us some excellent female major NPCs. So long as the romance options remain 2 female, 2 male.

#61642
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages
Thinking aloud here, and in DA:O, didn't we only have three female companions? Not counting Shale, a DLC character and really kind of a gender neutral character.

#61643
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages
Though of course DA:O was 5 years ago, and they're more conscious concerning inclusion now than they were then....

#61644
meanieweenie

meanieweenie
  • Members
  • 3 502 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

R2s Muse wrote...

UPDATE ON FAN RECORDINGS:

David Gaider ‏: Evidently explicit permission was given for folks to share the PAX panel on social media. So be it. I retract my grousing. :)


Aww, I feel sorry for him lol Grumpy Bear had to apologize. *huggles the DG*

I do still understand not wanting "the masses" to see the footage though. I had to bite my tongue to keep from listing off my own criticisms. It's in my nature... but it's done out of love and anxiety concerning the game, which has meant so much to me. But I have to remind myself that it's not really the time to complain... especially on their own board.

AND... I don't think I talk about the stuff I like enough. Which one can assume is virtually everything I'm not complaining about lol

I feel ya. I think we're all anxious and for some reason it's easier to complain than to stay pleasant sometimes (I tell my reflection - lol) I can't count how often I type up a really b!tchy comment and delete it. I guess that's my therapy. That and cheap merlot. lol

#61645
SamaraDraven

SamaraDraven
  • Members
  • 2 312 messages

R2s Muse wrote...

SamaraDraven wrote...

charlottecorday wrote...

@Samara

It's an older quote from twitter. He didn't mean it as an insult just that he didn't particularly understand our fascination with Cullen and that we seemed to popped up out of nowhere lol.


Still... finding underwear on the sidewalk is rather... not good. hehehehe.... But I was merely curious because I hadn't seen it before. That's all. I was concerned that it was recent and therefore would have affected my opinion of him because I don't fancy us being the BSN punching bag and if he had returned to that, it makes things less pleasant on the rest of BSN. Once the Gator starts up, the rest of the community seems to think it's open season. :unsure: But no worries! False alarm. ^_^

LOL Samara, I don't think you're off base, however. He wasn't being complimentary, that's for certain...

BTW, welcome back!


Thanks R2. :) I don't think he was being complimentary either but I'm glad that was from before. ^_^

#61646
Phate Phoenix

Phate Phoenix
  • Members
  • 4 339 messages
I'm attempting to remember the gender balance from DAO. Three women originally, right? Not counting Shale. And four dudes? Not counting Dog or Loghain. So, four to four.

Yeah. Huh. I... don't know. I doubt they'll add a second female warrior though. None of the leaked info really points to one. And not a mage, if they're keeping Dorian and their previous stance on no full-mage parties. So, girl rogues. Maybe Scribe Girl is a rogue?

#61647
R2s Muse

R2s Muse
  • Members
  • 19 876 messages

carine wrote...

R2s Muse wrote...

carine wrote...

I honestly don't think they'll make Leliana a companion or LI.

DG said something about not making you "cheat" on your LI from a previous game, so even *if* she's a companion I doubt she'll be a love interest. That would mean that people who romanced her in Origins would lose out on a love interest in DA:I and only have three options (if they go with the usual two of each sex). 

Yeah, I was just going to say this. DG  has definitely confirmed you won't be romancing anyone you could romance in the past. They could make it a toggle/conditional, but the way DG talked about it sounded like he didn't even want to go there.

I don't know that that's reason for her not to be a party member... but my gut says she won't be based on the way the GI articles talked about her.


Yeah, I'm not saying that's the reason why she's not a companion -- I think that there are better reasons for her to not show up as a party member, but if she happened to be one she would not be an LI.

I think there will, however, be one more female party member. I'm not sure who will get taken out (please not Cullen). I'm thinking Iron Bull/Trident Guy might be agents/important characters but not companions.

Kind of hoping for a female dwarf to be honest.

OH yeah, I know! Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you were. I was just talking generally!  Agree.

And, agree on the female companion balance. I wonder if it's worthwhile separating out the companions from the leaked survey vs. those we've seen in concept art. In the art, Matt Rhodes has already acknowledged that he tends to have his own biases ( I don't mean that in a bad way) in what he draws, suggesting that not every person in every piece is going to reflect the final characters decisions/gender breakdown/etc.

#61648
Chanda

Chanda
  • Members
  • 3 195 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

Thinking aloud here, and in DA:O, didn't we only have three female companions? Not counting Shale, a DLC character and really kind of a gender neutral character.


Morrigan, Wynne and Leliana. 2 mages and a rogue. Good point!

#61649
carine

carine
  • Members
  • 960 messages

motomotogirl wrote...

Thinking aloud here, and in DA:O, didn't we only have three female companions? Not counting Shale, a DLC character and really kind of a gender neutral character.


hm. Good point. We had Wynne, Morrigan, and Leliana. 

I guess it felt like more women characters to me because Morrigan and Wynne were almost always in my party. 

But I guess I'd still like one more, since DA2 was more even with Bethany, Isabela, Aveline, and Merrill. 

#61650
SamaraDraven

SamaraDraven
  • Members
  • 2 312 messages

Phate Phoenix wrote...

Alright, I saw that you guys were discussing companions and their classes earlier, so I have to jump in with my own thoughts.

WARRIOR
1) Cullen
2) Cassandra
3) Grey Warden
4) Iron Bull

ROGUE
4) Varric
6) Cole
7) Sera

MAGE
8) Vivienne
9) Dorian (Chill?)

I have Cole as a rogue because the leaked survey had the actual word "ROGUE" in Cole's bio. I think it's a good spread, giving you the ability to make Tanks and Off-Takes, Rogues and Archers, and Mages of any kind of mass-destruction.

Also, howdy~

I find it humourous my first post in the Cullen thread is primarily not about Cullen. But you guys have some of the best conversations on the whole site, it seems. :D


We tend to discuss a wide variety of topics in here. :D And it's always nice to meet new people. So come on in! Grab a Cullen, the crazy is fine! ;)