Edited for ToP - Thoughtful Cullen:
Modifié par R2s Muse, 03 octobre 2011 - 08:18 .
Modifié par R2s Muse, 03 octobre 2011 - 08:18 .

Modifié par Avilia, 04 octobre 2011 - 08:55 .
Modifié par Avilia, 04 octobre 2011 - 09:06 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
*jumps into thread*
You've probably covered this but...
I've been thinking of the Mage / Templar conflict and honestly, it would be the perfect time for Cullen to be a squadmate. Whether or not you support the mages, he'd be able to tag along due to his conflict of loyalty between mages and templar (due to Meredith).
Such a conflict of character and being able to support one side or another within his conflict, possibly telling him that there needs to be a middle ground if you want to would be fascinating. There's far too much potential there for it to not be explored, though it's entirely possible he could return as an NPC (though that'd be lame as there's rarely much protagonist influence or dealings in that case).
*jumps out*
Naqey wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
*jumps into thread*
You've probably covered this but...
I've been thinking of the Mage / Templar conflict and honestly, it would be the perfect time for Cullen to be a squadmate. Whether or not you support the mages, he'd be able to tag along due to his conflict of loyalty between mages and templar (due to Meredith).
Such a conflict of character and being able to support one side or another within his conflict, possibly telling him that there needs to be a middle ground if you want to would be fascinating. There's far too much potential there for it to not be explored, though it's entirely possible he could return as an NPC (though that'd be lame as there's rarely much protagonist influence or dealings in that case).
*jumps out*
I hope you don't mind that I delurk in your thread for moment, because I find that interesting.
I'd simply love to see Cullen as a companion, and actually think that he has a lot of potential. I always wished to have a templar in my team, simply to get to know the order better, get some inside views on their job, why someone would become a templar and so on. Especially now, in a post-DA2 world in which the Order has broken away from the Chantry... !
But I disagree that it would be perfect time for him to join because of his torn loyalties. Are his loyalties really torn? I'd like to hear some opinions of the "Cullen experts", but to me it always seemed like Cullen had his loyalties sorted out well enough. He is a templar through and through, even more so than in DA:O. Sure, there's the Amell/Surana dalliance, but if anything, it has made his stance even more rigid, seeing how it "weakend" him and made him let down his defences just to be proven how dangerous mages are in the chaos that ensued in the Ferelden Circle.
He opposed Meredith, because she is barking mad. But Meredith is not the templars. With regards to templar "ideology" Cullen is quite "orthodox", telling you how mages are not people like you and me and cautioning Hawke to not be over-trusting towards mages. The only templar we've met so far who does seem to have these torn loyalties is, well Thrask, and maybe the templar Carver (Malcolm Hawke's friend).
But I still think it would be great to have Cullen... just for other reasons. Now that the mage-templar conflict got out of hand, I'd like to see how Cullen deals with it. I'd especially like to see him confronted with a lot of the "greys" of that war... see how he takes it. Mehe, and maybe I'm a little bit of a sadist, but the though of romancing him with a mage character is just *too* endearing...
Modifié par R2s Muse, 07 octobre 2011 - 12:20 .
Modifié par Avilia, 08 octobre 2011 - 07:13 .
R2s Muse wrote...
He said he'd never question the Order again, and then here he is again! For example, when he finally let's the mages surrender (in pro-templar ending) and publicly disagrees with her "judge, jury and executioner" view, I think that's when he finally starts to stand on his own ("yes, I think that's what being a templar is about"). Supporting Hawke in the end is just the straw that broke the camel's back in my view.
Does he still think mages are weapons that the public need to be protected from? Probably. But I think he would also believe that the mages need to be protected, too. So, I don't see him necessarily being pro-mage all of the sudden (or even terribly anti-mage), but I see him having an "everyone needs to be protected" philosophy.
R2s Muse wrote...
Is he still conflicted post-Act3? IMO, it sounds like there's no easy
answer to what the "true" Order stands for, with even the Templars
defecting from the Chantry left and right during the mage-Templar war.
In principle, all he would have at that point would be his own moral
compass. So I'd imagine that situation would be ripe for soul searching
and not a little bit of angst (angst which David Gaider has hinted he'll
get!). Plus, eventhough he was acting his own conscience at the
Gallows, he still was insubordinate to his superior officer. So he could
even be an ex-Templar at that point, which could lead to an identity
crisis. Lots of fun for further exploration!
Ah, I see. Yes, totally agree!Naqey wrote...
That's what I meant by "Cullen is pretty orthodox": he sees the Orders role as that of a protector but also a watchdog; mages are humans who need to be protected from themselves. But they are still no ordinary beings and dangerous, and to a certain extent collectively guilty (of making the Maker turn away from his children).
I think you're right. I'm SO curious to see what the motivation is for all the various Templar factions. It sounds like some have broken away to "hunt down" rogue mages, harkening back to I guess the original inquisition-like aspect of the Order (don't recall where I read they were like that... perhaps in the Seeker codexes?). So, are those that stay with the Chantry more "orthodox," to use your word, i.e. more moderate? I always get a hard-core political vibe from the Chantry, so I don't know if that jibes. But then, Cassandra ostensibly is supposed to have a moderate view of the conflict. Dunno. I could also imagine a storyline where Cullen becomes the new Knight-Vigilant, re-establishing the Order's "true" purpose. Heh heh.I think post-Act3 is when any conflict in Cullen will really take off, for the very reasons that you have named. If the Order takes on a more extreme "anti-mage" stance as a reaction to the escalating situation (and it seems very probably that they do - after all they broke away from the Chantry to oppose the mages; seems like Alrik and Meredith like people are getting the upper hand in the ranks of the Order...) , then Cullen might well feel increasingly alienated in his more "orthodox" (which I take as meaning "lenient", since that is how I picture the intention contained in the Order's foundation) position...
LOL - yes, there's always that danger, but I think he said that in that recent fan interview.Anyhuu... I'm looking forward to more Cullen. And angst. Did Mr. Gaider say angst? Argh... when he says these things than it's getting *really* dark
))
Modifié par R2s Muse, 08 octobre 2011 - 10:33 .