thats1evildude wrote...
LolaLei wrote...
Thats1evildude: I was trying to be funny, but whatever. No need to be a smart arse dear.
So am I! But if you were offended, my apologies.
Apology accepted, hard to tell sometimes through writing alone.
thats1evildude wrote...
LolaLei wrote...
Thats1evildude: I was trying to be funny, but whatever. No need to be a smart arse dear.
So am I! But if you were offended, my apologies.
thats1evildude wrote...
Oh yeah, the flame is coming out of her hand, which totally means she was a mage! It couldn't be because she was sentenced to death by fire and was purified by the flames, which in turn became a symbol of her church!
That's sort of like saying that Jesus is depicted as being nailed to the cross because he was a carpenter.![]()
Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 07 août 2012 - 08:51 .
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
But to be serious for a moment, not quite. At least, not in my mind. If they were really going to go for a whole "purified by fire" thing, they'd quite literally have fire enveloping the statue as a way to do so.
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
There's a great deal of evidence to make one think she was a Mage. Whether she was truly chosen by the Maker is another matter, but the two aren't mutually exclusive.
Modifié par thats1evildude, 07 août 2012 - 09:00 .
thats1evildude wrote...
Well, there are practical reasons for not doing htat. A statue with fire coming out of its hand via magic is a really elaborate lantern or torch. A whole statue enveloped by flame is a house fire screaming to happen.
But nothing conclusive.
I've heard nothing that doesn't make me dismiss this evidence as wishful thinking on the part of forumites who desperately want the Chantry to be wrong because the Chantry sucks, yo.
But anyway, that Cullen guy! Isn't he dreamy? I heard he's dreamy.
Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 07 août 2012 - 09:08 .
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
True, some people simply want it for those reasons, which isn't all that bad. I just want the Chantry to be wrong because of the delicious irony it'd create, doubly so if she was a Blood Mage. A triple whammy would occur if she was the Dumat OGB -- or whatever Old God truly led the 1st Blight. For bonus points, make her a Somniari.
To me the Chantry doesn't completely suck, but it's certainly not something I really care enough about to say "Hey stop harassing them!"
Due in large part to the whole Mage-Templar situation originating from what they've done throughout history, so I'm happy to see it come crashing down on them.But anyway, that Cullen guy! Isn't he dreamy? I heard he's dreamy.
Not as dreamy as Maraas.
Never given it much thought, but.. There's also nothing conclusive about the existence of the Maker.But nothing conclusive.
Modifié par Sylvanpyxie, 07 août 2012 - 09:42 .
meanieweenie wrote...
Also, my eyes first read "Not as dreamy as my a**" and it made me laugh quite loudly. So thank you.
That he is!thats1evildude wrote...
But nothing conclusive. I've heard nothing that doesn't make me dismiss this evidence as wishful thinking on the part of forumites who desperately want the Chantry to be wrong because the Chantry sucks, yo.
But anyway, that Cullen guy! Isn't he dreamy? I heard he's dreamy.
LolaLei wrote...
VampOrchid wrote...
wow any cullen or da3 news yet?
Nothing yet, but there's been some interesting tweets from the DA team.
Whilst your here, we all read your tumblr with Cullen's DA:O dialogue (I adore his comment about Andraste and the Maker.) Do you have the voice samples of his unused dialogue? Like, his battle cries etc?
LolaLei wrote...
Nothing yet, but there's been some interesting tweets from the DA team.
LolaLei wrote...
VampOrchid: Didn't you make a Tumblr post with a dialogue tree of all Cullens lines in DA:O and a post with a recorded sample of unused dialogue with Cullen wondering if Andraste was a virgin? Or was that someone else lol. Maybe I'm getting confused or something.
LolaLei wrote...
OH! LOL my bad! Still, you should totally check it out! Does anyone have the link?
R2s Muse wrote...
Mostly thanks to you, I think, Lola! Kudos!
For fun, Greg Ellis has a new Web site. For your listening pleasure, his voiceover page: http://www.gregellis...Voiceover.html
Modifié par LolaLei, 08 août 2012 - 02:12 .
Well, it does. And the Maker is even more transparently evil than... a controversial transparent evil thing. In fact, one thing I wanted to do in DAO is transcribe Hespith's poem, tape a copy to the broodmother's corpse, then drag it into Denerim's cathedral and say "Yep, this was all the Maker's idea."But nothing conclusive. I've heard nothing that doesn't make me dismiss this evidence as wishful thinking on the part of forumites who desperately want the Chantry to be wrong because the Chantry sucks, yo.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 08 août 2012 - 05:00 .
Xilizhra wrote...
Well, it does. And the Maker is even more transparently evil than... a controversial transparent evil thing. In fact, one thing I wanted to do in DAO is transcribe Hespith's poem, tape a copy to the broodmother's corpse, then drag it into Denerim's cathedral and say "Yep, this was all the Maker's idea."But nothing conclusive. I've heard nothing that doesn't make me dismiss this evidence as wishful thinking on the part of forumites who desperately want the Chantry to be wrong because the Chantry sucks, yo.
Xilizhra wrote...
Well, it does. And the Maker is even more transparently evil than... a controversial transparent evil thing. In fact, one thing I wanted to do in DAO is transcribe Hespith's poem, tape a copy to the broodmother's corpse, then drag it into Denerim's cathedral and say "Yep, this was all the Maker's idea."But nothing conclusive. I've heard nothing that doesn't make me dismiss this evidence as wishful thinking on the part of forumites who desperately want the Chantry to be wrong because the Chantry sucks, yo.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 08 août 2012 - 05:16 .