LolaLei wrote...
I was just lurking around in some of the
other threads in the main forum and someone mentioned that in DA2 we
were practically drowning in mage's/the mage plight and that it's high
time we got a proper Templar companion to see the other side of things.
I'm very inclined to agree. Don't get me wrong I'm all for mages but
we've yet to truly experience the Templars plight from a personal level,
and what could be more personal than Cullen to fill that role! We
already know him and have experienced a little of what he's been
through, he's likable AND has enough inner torment for us to actually
begin to sympathise with his situation.
The Templars are so easy
to hate, I want to see a different side to them so that when it comes to
me making that "difficult decision" (whatever it may be) I'll genuinely
feel torn about the choice I need to make.
There is no
"templar plight," unless you count drug addiction. And even then, DA2
says that you're free to walk away, presumably before the lyrium thing
starts. Unless the Chantry is outright conscripting orphans instead of doing what the codex says it does and recruiting amoral zealots, I see no
great reason to be sympathetic to these people as a group. Cullen already
told of all that bad things that happened to him, and if that didn't
help his case, nothing will.
brushyourteeth wrote...
I think one of the reasons that it's so easy for us to sympathize so completely with the mages (besides the fact that we like to root for the little guy and we've all felt like that someone who's been persecuted for being different at some point or other) is that when characters talk about a single possessed mage destroying an entire village, we have no idea what that looks like or what it really means. We do however see Templars being jerks in both games, and that's a lot more memorable than the ones who are level-headed and compassionate (the one who gave Wynne sweets when she was first fetched to the Tower... d'aww).
We don't understand how scary magic is because the games haven't done an adequate job of showing us that. Even when the Ferelden Circle gets all abominationed... I don't know. I feel like that scene should have been as scary as Hespith in the Deep Roads was. That if we'd been forced to sit and watch dozens to hundreds of people get slaughtered by a monster maybe we'd know where the devs were coming from on this one.
Except we
do get to see that, with Redcliffe. There's an example of a possessed mage wreaking havoc on one village... and then there's all the rather weak abominations to slaughter through for the rest of the game, to show just how rare that situation really is and how badly the templars have spread the propaganda about that happening at any time to justify their tyranny. The templars **** so continuously about magic's supposed dangers that I don't really feel the need to see more cinematic propaganda on the matter. Of course, despite the Dead Trenches, I still supported the Architect, so maybe it wouldn't work on me regardless.