The Official Knight-Captain Cullen Discussion thread 2.0.
#11826
Posté 31 août 2012 - 04:52
#11827
Guest_Avejajed_*
Posté 31 août 2012 - 04:55
Guest_Avejajed_*
#11828
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:01
#11829
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:01
#11830
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:02
#11831
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:05
#11832
Guest_Avejajed_*
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:06
Guest_Avejajed_*
#11833
Guest_Avejajed_*
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:10
Guest_Avejajed_*
#11834
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:10
Mages aren't an organization. Templars are. There's far more similarity of thought among the Templar Order than there is among "mages," a category that'd include every Circle mage, ever magister, every Keeper and every First, and every Saarebas.VampOrchid wrote...
So if you're going to look at it that way. Then you have to look at it that way for mages too...which by the way I'm pro mage...but still....
So take the over used example...Anders blowing up the Chantry...Uhmm yeah...so does that mean all other mages are bad? Oooh don't forge Uldred...so all other mages are gonna do the same? Remember, the blood mages following him were only doing what they were told too...so yeah...
#11835
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:14
It looks like he waiting for us lol.LolaLei wrote...
#11836
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:19
To be honest though, I don't blame the mages or Templars, it's the Chantry that's caused this problem. They've created an army dependant on a drug that keeps many of them obeying orders. I feel pity for Templars (except the rapey torturing ones.) I'm pretty sure they conscript orphans into the Order when they come of age too, think about it, a lot of kids without parents get sent to the chantry. Some become Sisters/Brothers of the cloth, the stronger ones get put in for Templar training.
That's my theory anyway.
#11837
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:21
#11838
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:23
Yeah your right he does lol..its kinda sad.LolaLei wrote...
Lol casey, I really love that picture. He looks so melancholic, like he's looking out over the sea wondering what fate awaits him.
#11839
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:26
The Chantry, though, didn't prosecute a war against the Circles. That was all down to the Order. The Chantry set everything up, to be sure, but the templars have slipped the leash and become worse than the Chantry ever wanted (despite that being pretty bad to begin with).LolaLei wrote...
Most of them want freedom, that's a general consensus amongst mages lol. Many will do what it takes to get it, in the same way that many Templars will do what it takes to stop them.
To be honest though, I don't blame the mages or Templars, it's the Chantry that's caused this problem. They've created an army dependant on a drug that keeps many of them obeying orders. I feel pity for Templars (except the rapey torturing ones.) I'm pretty sure they conscript orphans into the Order when they come of age too, think about it, a lot of kids without parents get sent to the chantry. Some become Sisters/Brothers of the cloth, the stronger ones get put in for Templar training.
That's my theory anyway.
#11840
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:27
cacey lee wrote...
Yeah your right he does lol..its kinda sad.LolaLei wrote...
Lol casey, I really love that picture. He looks so melancholic, like he's looking out over the sea wondering what fate awaits him.
Yeah, he looks conflicted. I think it's supposed to be a picture of him during his time in the Ferelden Circle, but it world just as well for Kirkwall as well... Hell you can even pretend it's Orlais and he's just "getting some air", trying to take his mind off the feelings he's developing for the new protagonist lol.
#11841
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:28
Xilizhra wrote...
Mages aren't an organization. Templars are. There's far more similarity of thought among the Templar Order than there is among "mages," a category that'd include every Circle mage, ever magister, every Keeper and every First, and every Saarebas.VampOrchid wrote...
So if you're going to look at it that way. Then you have to look at it that way for mages too...which by the way I'm pro mage...but still....
So take the over used example...Anders blowing up the Chantry...Uhmm yeah...so does that mean all other mages are bad? Oooh don't forge Uldred...so all other mages are gonna do the same? Remember, the blood mages following him were only doing what they were told too...so yeah...
Tervinter mages are an organization. So is the group that Anders was working for. But that's more of a terroist group. And if you think of it, they, not by choice are more of a faction. School if you will.
Anyways, I'm off to bed ladies and gents. night nights
#11842
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:34
#11843
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:35
That being said, there will be a fair amount that won't join the rebellion, instead staying loyal to the Divine. It's those Templars that can be educated to find a better way to solve things. I like to believe Cullen will be among them. For all his ample mistakes he's not a bad man, I honestly can't see him going against the Divine's will, which currently appears to be very sympathetic towards mages.
Modifié par LolaLei, 31 août 2012 - 05:36 .
#11844
Posté 31 août 2012 - 05:42
I support this in part because it could lead to a rather interesting atmosphere of oppression; if the Templar Order is able to gain sufficient clout, it might be able to declare a sort of international martial law for its mage pogrom, so it wouldn't necessarily be open war at first, so much as needing to sneak around in hostile territory with the templars demanding proof of everyone suspicious that they aren't a mage. For instance.
#11845
Posté 31 août 2012 - 06:36
That last paragraph is something I've been contemplating for a while. The templars are a large body of highly-trained, highly-organized men and women with a unique skill set that allows them to neutralize mages. With enough support from clerics who have left the Chantry, it would not be difficult for them to create a new religious heirarchy led by a newly created matriarch, a Red Divine, or something similar. This would create an environment much like Tevinter with its Black Divine, but pointing in the opposite direction.Xilizhra wrote...
Truth be told, I think there'll be more mothers and clerics breaking away from the Divine to support the templars, than the other way around. Her popularity was never all that high to begin with.
I support this in part because it could lead to a rather interesting atmosphere of oppression; if the Templar Order is able to gain sufficient clout, it might be able to declare a sort of international martial law for its mage pogrom, so it wouldn't necessarily be open war at first, so much as needing to sneak around in hostile territory with the templars demanding proof of everyone suspicious that they aren't a mage. For instance.
The idea of forcing suspected mages to prove that they have no magical abilities is chilling. How do you prove the non-existance of a voluntary ability? Torture? Thedas is in for a rough time, it seems.
#11846
Posté 31 août 2012 - 07:17
I also see the templar net widening; in the knowledge that new mages will be born regardless, they declare that all those who carry magic in their blood need to be kept under... supervision. At first. Then outright confinement; then, near the end, he finally orders that they all be killed as well, to end the sin of magic forever.
#11847
Posté 31 août 2012 - 11:04
LOL ^This!cacey lee wrote...
It looks like he waiting for us lol.LolaLei wrote...
#11848
Posté 31 août 2012 - 11:06
Here you're starting to mix apples and oranges, though, Xil. You can't start introducing completely hypothetical actions of a post-Nevarran Accord Templar Order when we have NO IDEA what they did or didn't do after Asunder. I think we need to stick to things we actually "know" the templars have done as reasons they are bad.Xilizhra wrote...
The Chantry, though, didn't prosecute a war against the Circles. That was all down to the Order. The Chantry set everything up, to be sure, but the templars have slipped the leash and become worse than the Chantry ever wanted (despite that being pretty bad to begin with).LolaLei wrote...
Most of them want freedom, that's a general consensus amongst mages lol. Many will do what it takes to get it, in the same way that many Templars will do what it takes to stop them.
To be honest though, I don't blame the mages or Templars, it's the Chantry that's caused this problem. They've created an army dependant on a drug that keeps many of them obeying orders. I feel pity for Templars (except the rapey torturing ones.) I'm pretty sure they conscript orphans into the Order when they come of age too, think about it, a lot of kids without parents get sent to the chantry. Some become Sisters/Brothers of the cloth, the stronger ones get put in for Templar training.
That's my theory anyway.
Modifié par R2s Muse, 31 août 2012 - 11:32 .
#11849
Posté 31 août 2012 - 11:31
goddammit ... just lost everything I typed ... *fume*berelinde wrote...
That last paragraph is something I've been contemplating for a while. The templars are a large body of highly-trained, highly-organized men and women with a unique skill set that allows them to neutralize mages. With enough support from clerics who have left the Chantry, it would not be difficult for them to create a new religious heirarchy led by a newly created matriarch, a Red Divine, or something similar. This would create an environment much like Tevinter with its Black Divine, but pointing in the opposite direction.Xilizhra wrote...
Truth be told, I think there'll be more mothers and clerics breaking away from the Divine to support the templars, than the other way around. Her popularity was never all that high to begin with.
I support this in part because it could lead to a rather interesting atmosphere of oppression; if the Templar Order is able to gain sufficient clout, it might be able to declare a sort of international martial law for its mage pogrom, so it wouldn't necessarily be open war at first, so much as needing to sneak around in hostile territory with the templars demanding proof of everyone suspicious that they aren't a mage. For instance.
The idea of forcing suspected mages to prove that they have no magical abilities is chilling. How do you prove the non-existance of a voluntary ability? Torture? Thedas is in for a rough time, it seems.
Anyway, OK, speculation I can get behind, as I totally agree with both of you that Thedas is in for a dark time. I headcanon that the new Templar Order isn't interested in keeping or training the mages at all, except a few who will be useful. I see them viewing new mages coming into their powers as only a threat and potential resource drain, so they would be routinely destroyed. Since the Chantry has no physical power of its own, the Order retains the Towers and uses them for prisoners of war and "loyalist" mages. I completely see them transforming back into their Inquisition-like form (no, not discussing the nonsense from the leaks! ugh) and becoming hunters again instead of wardens.
@Xil, I really like your ideas, too. I agree that Thedas is no doubt in for a rough time of it. I hadn't really thought about mothers breaking away, too, but I'll bet you're right! Next up: the Great Schism! Splinter factions of the Chantry springing up everywhere, all with their own interpretation of Andraste's will toward mages. Heh heh, interesting times.
Modifié par R2s Muse, 31 août 2012 - 11:36 .
#11850
Posté 31 août 2012 - 12:58
The Chant isn't the problem - people are. Magic isn't the problem - people are. There is light and dark to both sides. The point that David Gaider keeps trying to reinforce to us is that whichever group is in power will be the group guilty of the greatest atrocities. Actually, it shows how messed up people are that they're given a strong moral code like the Chant and can fail at upholding it so miserably while convincing themselves (and others, apparently) that they're fulfilling it so completely. The mages, meanwhile, don't even have a code of conduct, and are likely to show us even more of the same laissez-faire attitude we saw in Kirkwall. Not because magic is bad, but because we'll repeatedly see it's certain individuals who are bad.
But wanting one side to be more evil so that you can hate them more.... yeah, I don't get that. To me, it invalidates all one's assertions that they already are (which I wasn't inclined to believe to begin with, but still)





Retour en haut





