brushyourteeth wrote...
I'm interested until I see somebody coming up with a scenario that proves the Chantry is completely full of ruthless wackjobs just because "I like that idea" so that it's easier to hate them.
The Chant isn't the problem - people are. Magic isn't the problem - people are. There is light and dark to both sides. The point that David Gaider keeps trying to reinforce to us is that whichever group is in power will be the group guilty of the greatest atrocities. Actually, it shows how messed up people are that they're given a strong moral code like the Chant and can fail at upholding it so miserably while convincing themselves (and others, apparently) that they're fulfilling it so completely. The mages, meanwhile, don't even have a code of conduct, and are likely to show us even more of the same laissez-faire attitude we saw in Kirkwall. Not because magic is bad, but because we'll repeatedly see it's certain individuals who are bad.
But wanting one side to be more evil so that you can hate them more.... yeah, I don't get that. To me, it invalidates all one's assertions that they already are (which I wasn't inclined to believe to begin with, but still)
The Chantry doesn't have to be full of ruthless whackjobs. The world would be a very different and much nicer place if you had to be monstrous to commit atrocities; you don't. All you have to do is possess a drive for conformity, which almost everyone does, and have an evil master who can convince you that your enemies aren't people. I don't believe that every templar would, given a chance to think independently about things, choose to believe that all mages should die, but the master they serve has apparently chosen this, and they don't want to think enough to go against him. Conformists do far, far more damage than sadists.