Jeez...everything short of a battleship looks like a toy next to an American carrier...Seboist wrote...
http://en.wikipedia....Chakri_Nareubet
Thoughts about the Destiny Ascension's (possible) role in Mass Effect 3
#51
Posté 30 août 2011 - 12:40
#52
Posté 30 août 2011 - 12:57
#53
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:00
#54
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:00
we're the last superpower broHumanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Jeez...everything short of a battleship looks like a toy next to an American carrier...Seboist wrote...
http://en.wikipedia....Chakri_Nareubet
#55
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:03
Xilizhra wrote...
The only Reaper we've seen in combat in-game is Sovereign, who was designed to operate alone. Sovereign is probably one of the most powerful Reapers out there.
Sovereign is the biggest class of Reapers, meaning it is one of the most powerful Reapers. However, we've already seen hundreds of Reapers that size. Only one would be needed to destroy the Destiny Ascencion.
Reapers can be anywhere from 500 to 2000 meters.
#56
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:05
#57
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:16
#58
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:24
That's...not really what I meant. A vessel that is theoretically powerful but which has never been used in anger due to a certain reason unrelated to intrinsic design fitness for warfare - lack of money for maintenance, lack of a war in which to fight, that sort of thing - is different. The Chakri Naruebet itself is useless because the Thais don't have a need for naval power projection and don't have the money to maintain it; in the Royal Navy or something, the same vessel would be quite useful indeed.Seboist wrote...
http://en.wikipedia....Chakri_Nareubet
I don't see any circumstances in which the Destiny Ascension even could be used for military purposes: it's a huge target with loads of personnel on it and garbage maneuverability with a very large main gun that can't be aimed at anything effectively.
#59
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:26
#60
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:30
That just means they didn't make the gun big enough.<_<daqs wrote...
a very large main gun that can't be aimed at anything effectively.
#61
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:33
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
I think the DA can serve its design purpose pretty well, which is to defend a stationary object orders of magnitude larger than itself - the Citadel. To do that you need range, firepower, and bullet-sponge-ness. The DA has got all three.daqs wrote...
That's...not really what I meant. A vessel that is theoretically powerful but which has never been used in anger due to a certain reason unrelated to intrinsic design fitness for warfare - lack of money for maintenance, lack of a war in which to fight, that sort of thing - is different. The Chakri Naruebet itself is useless because the Thais don't have a need for naval power projection and don't have the money to maintain it; in the Royal Navy or something, the same vessel would be quite useful indeed.
I don't see any circumstances in which the Destiny Ascension even could be used for military purposes: it's a huge target with loads of personnel on it and garbage maneuverability with a very large main gun that can't be aimed at anything effectively.
To assault the Citadel you need heavy siege weapons like Sovereign, which a ship like the DA can target very effectively. No fast tracking turrets needed.
I also agree with the OP's main point. Saving both the DA and the CB is the right call. As Sun Tzu said, you should always minimize your losses and try to capture the enemy whole and intact.
#62
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:38
I'd have more truck with that if the DA hadn't done such an abominably bad job of defending the Citadel.iOnlySignIn wrote...
I think the DA can serve its design purpose pretty well, which is to defend a stationary object orders of magnitude larger than itself - the Citadel. To do that you need range, firepower, and bullet-sponge-ness. The DA has got all three.
To assault the Citadel you need heavy siege weapons like Sovereign, which a ship like the DA can target very effectively. No fast tracking turrets needed.
#63
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:39
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
I think a good analogy would be the Roman Ballista, along with the fortifications usually built around it. Slow and unwieldy yes, but very effective in both offensive and defensive siege warfare.
Edit: For fellow MechWarriors out there, the DA is like the Dire Wolf, which you should never underestimate.
Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 30 août 2011 - 01:45 .
#64
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:41
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Well actually I think it did fine (in the Paragon outcome anyway). It did what it is supposed to - absorbed a lot of fire, delayed enemy advance until reinforcements arrived. All that against a significantly more powerful, unknown enemy in a surprise attack. I think I'll give it 3.5 points out of 5.daqs wrote...
I'd have more truck with that if the DA hadn't done such an abominably bad job of defending the Citadel.
#65
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:48
Or perhaps Demetrios Poliorketes' Helepolis...big, huge, potentially awesome, but with rather annoying vulnerabilities.iOnlySignIn wrote...
The DA can also be used very effectively as a siege weapon itself. It can provide effective orbital bombardment, and absorb fire when faster strike craft like the Normandy SR2 neutralize crucial enemy targets with pinpoint strikes.
I think a good analogy would be the Roman Ballista, along with the fortifications usually build around it. Slow and unwieldy yes, but very effective in both offensive and defensive siege warfare.
See, the military value of a weapon - or a vessel, whatever - that big and important decreases as its propagandistic value goes up. Who wants to risk the symbol of Citadel power in a battle? That seemed rather blatantly clear in the actual Battle of the Citadel: the DA wasn't used to batter away at Sovereign's fleet, or to attack the Citadel once the arms were closed and Sovereign was inside, but was immediately detailed to carry the Council off the battlefield, as though both it and the Council were too valuable to lose.
It's like the First World War, when the German High Seas Fleet's operations were rather dramatically constricted because Kaiser Wilhelm didn't want to lose his "luxury fleet". Germany's battleships could and did outduel the Royal Navy (e.g. at Jutland, or during the Yarmouth and Lowestoft raid), but never took advantage of tactical successes because of the risk involved.
#66
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:50
#67
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:50
marshalleck wrote...
I'll be rooting for Harbinger to take out the DA like swatting an annoying fly.
I'm assuming in your playthrough the DA won't exist anymore anyway.
#68
Posté 30 août 2011 - 01:56
#69
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 30 août 2011 - 02:02
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
I know I would. I don't know about Asari military doctrines. :-Sdaqs wrote...
See, the military value of a weapon - or a vessel, whatever - that big and important decreases as its propagandistic value goes up. Who wants to risk the symbol of Citadel power in a battle?
Somehow I think the DA will not be the *final* refuge of the Council. If the DA is about to be destroyed, the Council should obviously be evacuated into a small, hard-to-track escape pod. That they die with the DA in the Renegade outcome is either because they were surprised/overwhelmed by Sovereign, or plain bad writing.That seemed rather blatantly clear in the actual Battle of the Citadel: the DA wasn't used to batter away at Sovereign's fleet, or to attack the Citadel once the arms were closed and Sovereign was inside, but was immediately detailed to carry the Council off the battlefield, as though both it and the Council were too valuable to lose.
But the Germans did differently in WWII didn't they? The Bismarck was put to use in plenty of risky situations and took out her fair share of Royal Navy vessels before she went down. The Imperial Japanese Navy didn't hesitate to bring their best and most valuable warships to the frontline either - the Yamato was even turned into a suicide ship in the end IIRC.It's like the First World War, when the German High Seas Fleet's operations were rather dramatically constricted because Kaiser Wilhelm didn't want to lose his "luxury fleet". Germany's battleships could and did outduel the Royal Navy (e.g. at Jutland, or during the Yarmouth and Lowestoft raid), but never took advantage of tactical successes because of the risk involved.
I don't know about the Asari, but if I'm captain of the DA, she will go down like the Bismarck, if she goes down at all. But again, I can't expect blue space babes to follow Bushido, can I.
Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 30 août 2011 - 02:06 .
#70
Posté 30 août 2011 - 02:04
The da will light up space when harbi gets a hold of it.
#71
Posté 30 août 2011 - 02:15
Maybe, but the bad writing's all we have to go on.iOnlySignIn wrote...
Somehow I think the DA will not be the *final* refuge of the Council. If the DA is about to be destroyed, the Council should obviously be evacuated into a small, hard-to-track escape pod. That they die with the DA in the Renegade outcome is either because they were surprised/overwhelmed by Sovereign, or plain bad writing.
Yeah, by WWII the Germans shifted from a mass battle fleet to a navy that was basically designed around using all of its resources, from battleship on down, as commerce raiders. It kinda shifted from "too wussy to use their weapons correctly" to "too insanely aggressive-minded to use their weapons correctly".But the Germans did differently in WWII didn't they? The Bismarck was put to use in plenty of risky situations and took out her fair share of Royal Navy vessels before she went down. The Imperial Japanese Navy didn't hesitate to bring their best and most valuable warships to the frontline either - the Yamato was even turned into a suicide ship in the end IIRC.
I don't know about the Asari, but if I'm captain of the DA, she will go down like the Bismarck, if she goes down at all.
Japan's battle fleet was used more or less like the Germans' was supposed to in WWI. The mass wave of invasions in 1941-2 was supposed to lure the British and/or American fleet deep into WestPac to launch retaliatory strikes, whereupon the Japanese massed battle fleet would destroy it in a large-scale engagement. Unsurprisingly, just as the Grand Fleet didn't idiotically blunder into attacking Helgoland Bight, the Americans didn't blunder into attacking the IJN head-on. Finally, the Japanese were lured into attacking the Americans under unfavorable circumstances in the Philippines in 1944, resulting in the isolation and near-total destruction of Nishimura's Southern Force in Surigao Strait.
Anyway. Window dressing. Point is that, even the way the Germans and Japanese used their dreadnoughts in the Second World War - i.e. trying to get at least some nondeterrent use out of them - it was still a comparative waste of resources. I guess that doesn't make either the dreadnoughts - or the DA - intrinsically useless, but it certainly does make them look comparatively useless.
#72
Posté 30 août 2011 - 03:13
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR-PFv5dEKQmOizUZOZ5ahAChPPowEZ4aHVCSDWxuJIue-GiHHhmarshalleck wrote...
That just means they didn't make the gun big enough.<_<daqs wrote...
a very large main gun that can't be aimed at anything effectively.
#73
Posté 30 août 2011 - 03:13
However, having DA and more convention fleets as long range backup wouldn't hurt either. In a theoretical battle with my 1000+ Thanix frighters/frigates, the conventional fleets could stay at a distance while the smaller anti-Reaper vessels swarm them like bees, keeping the Reapers busy. That means the Reapers (and possible Oculi) have to engage one set of ships or the other and ignoring either set may mean death.
#74
Posté 30 août 2011 - 03:22
#75
Posté 30 août 2011 - 03:28
Shepard: "It's the Destiny Ascension!"
VS: "Thank God!"
...well, that's what I'd like to see.





Retour en haut






