6494 réponses à ce sujet

[Humanoid_Typhoon]

dreman9999 wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Does that say that logo is publicly known as a Cerberus logo? NO. Externally, that logo belongs to Cord-Hislop Aerospace.
Interanlly in that company, that logo balongs to Cerberus. The consept of a front is that no one knows what your really doing basd on out side aperances. It's a false fase. To any person that logo means Cord-Hislop Aerospace.
To a cerberus agent and one who know what cerberus is doing, it's a cerberus logo.

Source?

The codex shows that the logo is related to cerberus, it doesn't mention anything about Cord-Hislop. 

I already posted a source stating Cord-Hislop Aerospace is a cerberus front.  All I'm saying is that that logo has 2 meanings, one for the common public and one for the people who know.

But you've got no proof, and that's it.

The proof is the link and the fact the company is a cerberus front.

You can't prove the sun is hot because Earth gets heat from it.

I think this discussion is over,it's clear he is just disagreeing to disagree.

[MorrigansLove]

His Dragon Age 2 plot analysis is much better!

[Balek-Vriege]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Balek-Vriege wrote...

/snip

nope.
You cannot recreate neural pathways. Especially not from memory.

Not to mention for you idea to work one would have to know the setup before death... and how would you know that?

Good question.  The only way I was thinking was a brain scan of some type (basically Shepard's medical history).  If there was someway to map neural pathways from a brain scan 200 years in the future, you might be able to mimic such pathways by force enigneering them with nanites etc.  Then you could possibly just boot up the brain with a certain electrical pattern that it had before and voila.  Memories copied.

Sort of like copying a switchboard exactly so a person can get through with the same setup, but impossibly complicated (well at least in the present).

[dreman9999]

MorrigansLove wrote...

His Dragon Age 2 plot analysis is much better!

Espeically the part about the "cousin" who helps your family in the story and his detail analysis of Flemith.

[Nashiktal]

I really agreed with his analysis of DA2. Story direction aside (which I did not entirely mind) plot advancement was confusing and all over the place, there was little to no direction with what to do, and one of the ways they "advance" the plot is by using varrics "rumors" hidden away in a menu with little explanation about it, and varric makes no mention of this in game.

I enjoyed DA2 but that really bothered me.

[Guldhun2]

dreman9999 wrote...

MorrigansLove wrote...

His Dragon Age 2 plot analysis is much better!

Espeically the part about the "cousin" who helps your family in the story and his detail analysis of Flemith.

To bad for you, that cousin can also mean uncle. Try again please.

Modifié par Guldhun2, 31 août 2011 - 08:24 .

[dreman9999]

Nashiktal wrote...

I really agreed with his analysis of DA2. Story direction aside (which I did not entirely mind) plot advancement was confusing and all over the place, there was little to no direction with what to do, and one of the ways they "advance" the plot is by using varrics "rumors" hidden away in a menu with little explanation about it, and varric makes no mention of this in game.

I enjoyed DA2 but that really bothered me.

That's reffering to this.....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin#Explanation_chart

So no, saying cousin as your blood uncle is wrong. If he so into analysising things, he should use proper detail and understand them.
How can one not understand Flemith was in the locket the whole time?

[dreman9999]

Nashiktal wrote...

I really agreed with his analysis of DA2. Story direction aside (which I did not entirely mind) plot advancement was confusing and all over the place, there was little to no direction with what to do, and one of the ways they "advance" the plot is by using varrics "rumors" hidden away in a menu with little explanation about it, and varric makes no mention of this in game.

I enjoyed DA2 but that really bothered me.

Your get rumor via mail or varric. I think your reffering to the sub quest...The give stuff backs sub quest.

Modifié par dreman9999, 31 août 2011 - 08:35 .

[Fishy]

When i opened this thread i was like this




When i closed this thread i was like this

[Nashiktal]

Suprez30 wrote...

When i opened this thread i was like this




When i closed this thread i was like this

Please don't post useless spam. I don't like reporting people.

dreman9999 wrote...

Nashiktal wrote...

I really agreed with his analysis of DA2. Story direction aside (which I did not entirely mind) plot advancement was confusing and all over the place, there was little to no direction with what to do, and one of the ways they "advance" the plot is by using varrics "rumors" hidden away in a menu with little explanation about it, and varric makes no mention of this in game.

I enjoyed DA2 but that really bothered me.

That's reffering to this.....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin#Explanation_chart

So no, saying cousin as your blood uncle is wrong. If he so into analysising things, he should use proper detail and understand them.
How can one not understand Flemith was in the locket the whole time?

I think you quoted the wrong person there.

However in your other post, I was referring to those random rumors that pop up in the menu. They don't directly give you quests, but they feel pointless to me. If Varric has rumors, he should tell me. I didn't even know about that rumor journal slot till halfway through the game. Varric himself doesn't give all that many quests actually.

[Guldhun2]

dreman9999 wrote...
That's reffering to this.....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin#Explanation_chart

So no, saying cousin as your blood uncle is wrong. If he so into analysising things, he should use proper detail and understand them.

From that wiki->
...In kinship terminology, a cousin is a relative with whom one shares one or more common ancestors. ..

They both have a common ancestor. Please try again young padawan.

[dreman9999]

Guldhun2 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
That's reffering to this.....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin#Explanation_chart

So no, saying cousin as your blood uncle is wrong. If he so into analysising things, he should use proper detail and understand them.

From that wiki->
...In kinship terminology, a cousin is a relative with whom one shares one or more common ancestors. ..

They both have a common ancestor. Please try again young padawan.

So what? If he's going to make a detail analysis, it best to use the right detail. Saying Uncle is more detail than cousin, with the game say many times.

[Guldhun2]

dreman9999 wrote...


So what? If he's going to make a detail analysis, it best to use the right detail. Saying Uncle is more detail than cousin, with the game say many times.

You were wrong in your "lol cousin". And now you have "lol butthurt".

[111987]

Not to sound like a mod or anything, but we really should stick on topic and discuss Mass Effect.

[nelly21]

111987 wrote...

Not to sound like a mod or anything, but we really should stick on topic and discuss Mass Effect.

There really isn't anything left to discuss. Smudboy and his fans will continue to insist that everything they don't like about ME 2's story is a plot hole. Everyone else will continue to explain why it isn't.

50 pages of arguments commence with maybe 10% of posters actually understanding what a plot hole is.

[Guldhun2]

nelly21 wrote...

111987 wrote...

Not to sound like a mod or anything, but we really should stick on topic and discuss Mass Effect.

There really isn't anything left to discuss. Smudboy and his fans will continue to insist that everything they don't like about ME 2's story is a plot hole. Everyone else will continue to explain why it isn't.

50 pages of arguments commence with maybe 10% of posters actually understanding what a plot hole is.

Wikipedia
A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot,or constitutes a blatant omission of relevant information regarding the plot. These include such things as unlikely behaviour or actions of characters, illogical or impossible events, events happening for no apparent reason, or statements/events that contradict earlier events in the storyline.



unlikely behaviour -> In ME2
unlikely actions of characters -> In ME2
illogical events-> In ME2
impossible events ->Maybe in ME2 Depends on what your view of impossible is.
events happening for no apparent reason -> In ME2
events that contradict earlier events in the storyline -> ME2

For examples, view Smudboy's two series of ME2.

Thank you, come again. <3

Modifié par Guldhun2, 31 août 2011 - 09:05 .

[dreman9999]

Guldhun2 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...


So what? If he's going to make a detail analysis, it best to use the right detail. Saying Uncle is more detail than cousin, with the game say many times.

You were wrong in your "lol cousin". And now you have "lol butthurt".

I'm not wrong about it at all. Gablin is Hawks uncle. Also, by your definition, it would be right if Smudboy stated "Hawk and his cousins left fereldin to live in Kirwall" based on the loose definition of cousin you gave me.

[Humanoid_Typhoon]

There is a difference in knowing what a word means and understanding it...

[Fishy]

Nashiktal wrote...

Please don't post useless spam. I don't like reporting people.

I'm sorry but after reading through this thread i have come to the conclusion that i was at the right place.
Just because i don't want you to waste the mod precious time i will add that i haven't watched more than 2 min of smudboy video and the guy he's just trolling everyone here.  I mean it's work look at this thread. People are talking about nothingness.

I actually contribuated more in this thread by answering your threat of reporting.

Modifié par Suprez30, 31 août 2011 - 09:11 .

[nelly21]

Guldhun2 wrote...
Snip

Thank you for proving my point.

[dreman9999]

Guldhun2 wrote...

nelly21 wrote...

111987 wrote...

Not to sound like a mod or anything, but we really should stick on topic and discuss Mass Effect.

There really isn't anything left to discuss. Smudboy and his fans will continue to insist that everything they don't like about ME 2's story is a plot hole. Everyone else will continue to explain why it isn't.

50 pages of arguments commence with maybe 10% of posters actually understanding what a plot hole is.

Wikipedia
A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot,or constitutes a blatant omission of relevant information regarding the plot. These include such things as unlikely behaviour or actions of characters, illogical or impossible events, events happening for no apparent reason, or statements/events that contradict earlier events in the storyline.



unlikely behaviour -> In ME2
unlikely actions of characters -> In ME2
illogical events-> In ME2
impossible events ->Maybe in ME2 Depends on what your view of impossible is.
events happening for no apparent reason -> In ME2
events that contradict earlier events in the storyline -> ME2

For examples, view Smudboy's two series of ME2.

Thank you, come again. <3

Every single issue your brought up has been well countured. Nothing you stated in ME2 is illogical, impossible, unlikely, even contradicts anything in ME1.
Stating this is just going to have use list them all over again and make your comment mute.

[Guldhun2]

nelly21 wrote...

Guldhun2 wrote...
Snip

Thank you for proving my point.

Jumping through the omega 4 relay, without testing it, without knowing whats behind it, were no other ship has ever returned from, to stop something you have almost no information on, while using alien technology on board of your ship is logical?


Nice!

Modifié par Guldhun2, 31 août 2011 - 09:17 .

[111987]

Guldhun2 wrote...

nelly21 wrote...

Guldhun2 wrote...
Snip

Thank you for proving my point.

Jumping through the omega 4 relay, without testing it, without knowing whats behind it, to stop something you have almost no information on, while using alien technology on board of your ship is logical?


Nice!

I have countered this several times now, and provided explanations that makes perfectly logical sense. Just because it wouldn't be your plan of action or first preference does NOT make it a case of poor writing, or a plot hole.

[Guldhun2]

111987 wrote...
I have countered this several times now, and provided explanations that makes perfectly logical sense. Just because it wouldn't be your plan of action or first preference does NOT make it a case of poor writing, or a plot hole.

You have never countered that.

Give me one logical reason why not testing anything on the omega 4 relay is logical.

[nelly21]

Guldhun2 wrote...

Jumping through the omega 4 relay, without testing it, without knowing whats behind it, were no other ship has ever returned from, to stop something you have almost no information on, while using alien technology on board of your ship is logical?


Nice!

You've now proven my point twice.

They wanted to save their crew. Sending probes would give away their attack. Reaper IFF (Identify Friend Foe System for the mentally deficient) Disguises them long enough to get through the relay and defend themselves as necessary.

I just gave you three reasons it's logical. You will continue to find it illogical.

Now what?