Ce sujet est fermé
100k wrote...
SpiffySquee wrote...
Miranda, "In addition to the expected burns and internal injuries from the explosion, subject has suffered significant cellular breakdown due to long term exposure to vacuum and sub zero temperatures."
The burns and internal damage you claim she says are from atmospheric re-entry are from the explosions on the Normandy.It certainly says nothing about burns all over Shepard's body. That is simply you adding things in to make it help your point. All it tells us is that Shepard had at least 2 burns of unknown size somewhere on his body. They could have been small and isolated for all we know. So this does not help your argument at all. We have no proof that he received any severe burns from re-entry.
No. The "explosion" burns are from Shepard being burned when the Normandy blew up -- that much is true. The explosion hurled Shepard into space (and cracked his suit open against a wall). He likely was burned badly from within his suit -- though not enough to die.
Really? Show me proof. We see air escaping. that could be from a minute crack and would not be big enough to cause burns along the entire body. The armor could still do it's job.
The point is that there is no proof that the body burned up in atmo. Lotion said the log proved it happened, and that was false. There is no in game evidence that Shepards body was damaged what so ever by atmospheric re-entry. Since there is no way to tell how much heat re-entry caused or how much heat the suit can take, any argument that he received burns on re-entry is a woulda shoulda coulda arguments.
We also do not see him burning, we only see gas heating up. Since we have no way to measure how hot that gas is or how much heat the armor can take, we have no way of telling if it would cook shepard or not.
Again -- no. We SEE Shepard burning upon re-entry into the atmosphere -- just like all objects that re-eter the atmopshere of any planet. That much is incredibly clear. There is no gas surrounding that planet, and nothing to ignite it with in Shepards case. In fact, I don't even know if gas burns in space -- but its an irrelevant question because Shepard wasn't on fire when he neared the planet -- thus no gas could trigger such an effect.
But none of that explains how a (burning) human body falling from orbit remained intact after a plummet from at least 8 miles. It doesn't explain how Shepard's body managed to survive on the planet's surface when his armor was clearly shattered into pieces, and his helmet came off. The planet has no oxygen, and is freezing cold.
We just need an explaination -- so as to not cheapen Shepard's death.
Not quite sure what you are referring to here, but I was talking about the gas in the planets atmosphere. I apologize if I was not clear on that. Plummeting 8 miles or 1000 feet makes no difference. terminal velocity is terminal velocity. There are several cases of people falling amazing distances at terminal velocity and not only remaining intact, but alive. And they were not wearing futuristic armor.
Retour en haut
)
..
..
...
...
