One thing I did like about the end of DA2...
#1
Posté 28 août 2011 - 10:39
#2
Posté 29 août 2011 - 03:00
The vast majority of Thedas view templars as holy defenders...or at least they did. Most likely they seem them as thugs and ruffians by this point in the timeline.
#3
Posté 29 août 2011 - 03:19
The Templars have gone back to being the Inquisition now. Only they're far more dangerous because they're hooked on lyrium. The Chantry's own method of controlling them will now be an important part of their downfall. The Templars' and the Chantry's.
#4
Posté 29 août 2011 - 03:43
Sadly, it would most likely be too drastic to implement.
#5
Posté 29 août 2011 - 03:57
Especially if the templars go all nutso, like they are bound to do, once the lyrium lunacy kicks in.
#6
Posté 29 août 2011 - 04:06
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
Especially if the templars go all nutso, like they are bound to do, once the lyrium lunacy kicks in.
"If" is not the appropriate tense, as this already occured.
#7
Posté 29 août 2011 - 04:26
#8
Posté 29 août 2011 - 05:03
Urzon wrote...
I wonder if we will be seeing the return of Cullen in DA3, either as either as an important figure or ally. He always seemed to be a very devout person, and i don't see him agreeing with breaking off from the Chantry. I'm sure he will be for returning the mages to the Circles, but after having to work with nutcase Meredith; i could see how he would be opposed to taking the law into their own hands like the other templar.
If that bastard rears his ugly head again, we better finally be given the chance to remove it from his neck.
#9
Posté 29 août 2011 - 05:07
Rifneno wrote...
Urzon wrote...
I wonder if we will be seeing the return of Cullen in DA3, either as either as an important figure or ally. He always seemed to be a very devout person, and i don't see him agreeing with breaking off from the Chantry. I'm sure he will be for returning the mages to the Circles, but after having to work with nutcase Meredith; i could see how he would be opposed to taking the law into their own hands like the other templar.
If that bastard rears his ugly head again, we better finally be given the chance to remove it from his neck.
The only way I'll tolerate him is if he becomes more pro-mage. Not "Let them be free sans restrictions!", but just a more pro-mage person. Though I highly doubt he will so... sword please!
#10
Posté 29 août 2011 - 05:22
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
The only way I'll tolerate him is if he becomes more pro-mage. Not "Let them be free sans restrictions!", but just a more pro-mage person. Though I highly doubt he will so... sword please!
There is no way I'll tolerate him. It simply isn't going to happen. Every templar that followed Meredith in executing the Right of Annulment deserves to be executed. No exceptions.
#11
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 29 août 2011 - 05:32
Guest_Puddi III_*
Yes, along with the chance to kill all mages. Put them in their proper place... dead!The Baconer wrote...
Hopefully DA3 will allow us to return to the mundanes to their proper place in humble servitude.
#12
Posté 29 août 2011 - 05:35
Filament wrote...
Yes, along with the chance to kill all mages. Put them in their proper place... dead!
No, no. That'd be too wasteful.
Tranquil the lot of them, least we'd be able to use the profit to rebuild Thedas.
#13
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 29 août 2011 - 05:39
Guest_Puddi III_*
Dave of Canada wrote...
Filament wrote...
Yes, along with the chance to kill all mages. Put them in their proper place... dead!
No, no. That'd be too wasteful.
Tranquil the lot of them, least we'd be able to use the profit to rebuild Thedas.
Ahh yes, good point. They're much more useful that way.
#14
Posté 29 août 2011 - 11:58
Urzon wrote...
I wonder if we will be seeing the return of Cullen in DA3, either as either as an important figure or ally. He always seemed to be a very devout person, and i don't see him agreeing with breaking off from the Chantry. I'm sure he will be for returning the mages to the Circles, but after having to work with nutcase Meredith; i could see how he would be opposed to taking the law into their own hands like the other templar.
Cullen is unique in that he's seen tragedy caused by both sides of the equation. In DAO, he got to see Uldred up close and personal. In DA2, he experienced the madness of his templar commander up close and personal.
Seriously, you'd think after DA2 he'd just retire to try to get away from the insanity of it all.
#15
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:08
jamesp81 wrote...
Cullen is unique in that he's seen tragedy caused by both sides of the equation. In DAO, he got to see Uldred up close and personal. In DA2, he experienced the madness of his templar commander up close and personal.
Seriously, you'd think after DA2 he'd just retire to try to get away from the insanity of it all.
There's a big difference between the two events. In one of them, he was a witness/victim of the madness. In one of them, he was part of the madness. I don't see why he should get any more mercy than people give Idunna, for instance. Which is to say, none.
#16
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:12
Guest_Hanz54321_*
#17
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:15
#18
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:19
Rifneno wrote...
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
The only way I'll tolerate him is if he becomes more pro-mage. Not "Let them be free sans restrictions!", but just a more pro-mage person. Though I highly doubt he will so... sword please!
There is no way I'll tolerate him. It simply isn't going to happen. Every templar that followed Meredith in executing the Right of Annulment deserves to be executed. No exceptions.
Oh, the irony of this post. lol
#19
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:30
Relix28 wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
The only way I'll tolerate him is if he becomes more pro-mage. Not "Let them be free sans restrictions!", but just a more pro-mage person. Though I highly doubt he will so... sword please!
There is no way I'll tolerate him. It simply isn't going to happen. Every templar that followed Meredith in executing the Right of Annulment deserves to be executed. No exceptions.
Oh, the irony of this post. lol
#20
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:35
Relix28 wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
The only way I'll tolerate him is if he becomes more pro-mage. Not "Let them be free sans restrictions!", but just a more pro-mage person. Though I highly doubt he will so... sword please!
There is no way I'll tolerate him. It simply isn't going to happen. Every templar that followed Meredith in executing the Right of Annulment deserves to be executed. No exceptions.
Oh, the irony of this post. lol
Indeed. But they probably killed even the children. So if I get the chance to kill Cullen he´d better have a very good reason for me to spare him. I´m going Renegade here.
#21
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:38
Wait, you kill Idunna? Dang.Rifneno wrote...
jamesp81 wrote...
Cullen is unique in that he's seen tragedy caused by both sides of the equation. In DAO, he got to see Uldred up close and personal. In DA2, he experienced the madness of his templar commander up close and personal.
Seriously, you'd think after DA2 he'd just retire to try to get away from the insanity of it all.
There's a big difference between the two events. In one of them, he was a witness/victim of the madness. In one of them, he was part of the madness. I don't see why he should get any more mercy than people give Idunna, for instance. Which is to say, none.
Eh. I'll only kill Cullen if he tries to kill me and doesn't surrender; it's a policy I only lifted for Kelder, and that was because he was begging me to kill him.
#22
Posté 29 août 2011 - 01:24
Nerevar-as wrote...
Indeed. But they probably killed even the children. So if I get the chance to kill Cullen he´d better have a very good reason for me to spare him. I´m going Renegade here.
Exactly. In DAO Wynne pretty much writes "you're signing up to defenseless murder children?!" on a sign and beats the Warden with it. The RoA shown in DA2 is the Disney version. It wouldn't exactly be good for Bioware's PR to show up on Jack Thompson's latest crusade with footage of templar impaling a weeping, terrified child. But that is what's happening, DAO was crystal clear with that.
Xilizhra wrote...
Wait, you kill Idunna? Dang.
Eh. I'll only kill Cullen if he tries to kill me and doesn't surrender; it's a policy I only lifted for Kelder, and that was because he was begging me to kill him.
A few times on my most sympathetic characters I'd spare her, but for the most part she's wormfood. And really, I think that's more merciful than the only other option. We know the reputation of Kirkwall's templars... What do you really think was happening that she spent years wishing for death? And after she finally does turn good, what happens? Meredith has the Circle annuled.
#23
Posté 29 août 2011 - 01:28
Well, we don't know that she was killed during that (assuming you don't waste the whole Circle, obviously). I still hold out hope.A few times on my most sympathetic characters I'd spare her, but for the most part she's wormfood. And really, I think that's more merciful than the only other option. We know the reputation of Kirkwall's templars... What do you really think was happening that she spent years wishing for death? And after she finally does turn good, what happens? Meredith has the Circle annuled.
#24
Posté 29 août 2011 - 01:36
Xilizhra wrote...
Well, we don't know that she was killed during that (assuming you don't waste the whole Circle, obviously). I still hold out hope.
Fair enough. Personally I doubt she made it. It seemed like the ones who did were those who could escape while Hawke was going Incredible Hulk on the templars, but Idunna was in solitary confinement.
#25
Posté 29 août 2011 - 01:36





Retour en haut






