Man i tried...loved Dragon age 1 but this game...does it ever gets interesting?
#1
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:18
Im in the end of chapter 2, loose all interest in the game, but have a little hope ( love the firts one ,,,same team.. maybe a miracle... ) so thats why im writting , do things get better on chapter 3 or is the same stuff?
tnanks in advance
#2
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:28
#3
Posté 29 août 2011 - 12:39
#4
Posté 29 août 2011 - 01:38
#5
Posté 29 août 2011 - 01:46
#6
Posté 29 août 2011 - 02:08
#7
Posté 29 août 2011 - 02:09
#8
Posté 29 août 2011 - 02:41
jevo28 wrote...
So..i just played the BEST part of the game? .....
Act 2 was easily the best part of the game. The Arishok is actually a cool grey character on par with Loghain I think. I had no issues with the story/writing of the 2nd Act so much.
But Act 3? A drunk 13 year old writing fan fiction could have done a better ending.
#9
Posté 29 août 2011 - 02:57
#10
Posté 29 août 2011 - 03:06
jevo28 wrote...
Man i tried...loved Dragon age 1 but this game...does it ever gets interesting?
In my humble opinion: no.
#11
Posté 29 août 2011 - 03:39
Although after Act 3, the game does get a lot better with the Legacy dlc. Some really interesting lore in that.
#12
Posté 29 août 2011 - 04:40
Even though the plot for everything up to that point was very shakey....
And although the final boss is a little too.... anvilicious? Their dialogue during the final fight was... amazing.
Not to mention that the final fight was very beautifully choreographed and dramatic.
#13
Posté 29 août 2011 - 06:26
#14
Posté 29 août 2011 - 06:55
#15
Posté 29 août 2011 - 07:07
#16
Posté 29 août 2011 - 08:20
#17
Posté 29 août 2011 - 09:54
FaeQueenCory wrote...
The only thing I liked about Act3 was the final boss fight....
Even though the plot for everything up to that point was very shakey....
And although the final boss is a little too.... anvilicious? Their dialogue during the final fight was... amazing.
Not to mention that the final fight was very beautifully choreographed and dramatic.
What is the Battle of Denerim than, if Final battle in DA2 is dramatic? Super ultra mega dramatic! LOL
#18
Posté 29 août 2011 - 10:30
I found it the most interesting, however. The Mage / Templar conflict really didn't draw me in at all. Templars are bungholes, every mage is a blood mage and I had constant whining about each side from a few of my party members. By the time I got to the end of the game I wanted everyone to kill each other and for Hawke to leave Kirkwall like he should have years ago.alex90c wrote...
Act 2 had practically zilch to do with the Mage-Templar conflict.
#19
Posté 29 août 2011 - 10:46
No.
#20
Posté 30 août 2011 - 02:20
#21
Posté 30 août 2011 - 03:11
Act one was rather silly to say the least for me it basically comes down to running up hill, watch cinematic, fight a [couple] people skip a year then collect some money.
Act 2 was as said the best of a bad bunch it was semi interesting but by no means interesting enough to validate the shambles of the rest of the game or the actual gameplay elements themselves for me but story wise I was ok with the Arishok.
Act 3 is basically where most people end up farting rainbows filled with expletives because it's seriously tiny, extremely linear even the last choice is horribly forced and caused so many people to put dollar bills in swear jars that if collected would make someone as rich as bill gates. It was just seriously tacky and by far the worst part about the entire game.
Luckily it seems [guessing because have no intention of investing more money into DA2 or it's DLCs] people say the Legacy DLC is quite good it's just a shame that it will cost you more money on top of what already spent for the core game in order to get something that is good enough according to others to have been the mechanics of the main game in the first place.
Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 30 août 2011 - 03:23 .
#22
Posté 30 août 2011 - 03:46
dheer wrote...
I found it the most interesting, however. The Mage / Templar conflict really didn't draw me in at all. Templars are bungholes, every mage is a blood mage and I had constant whining about each side from a few of my party members. By the time I got to the end of the game I wanted everyone to kill each other and for Hawke to leave Kirkwall like he should have years ago.alex90c wrote...
Act 2 had practically zilch to do with the Mage-Templar conflict.
Okay dheer, you made me laugh so hard! I felt the same way about the mage/templar conflict. In fact I still could care less. Kill each other, please. The only ones I care about are in Ferelden where they seem to have some smaller semelence of sanity (not by much, Uldred, afterall. But Greagoir did let you save Irving and not do the rite. If they had been in Kirkwall the tower would have had the rite performed, EVERY mage would have freaked out and become an abomnation, and they would have blown up the tower). Seriously, that storyline was my least favorite, and the one they tried to push the hardest.
I much preferred Act 2, OP. And I liked the thaig and it's yummy possible implications (magic dealing dwarves who may have helped make the first darkspawn anyone), but they didn't give me enough for it. If you didn't enjoy Act 2 then Act 3 is not going to make you like the game either. It is one big WTF at the end. And for me, the boss fights should have been one depending on whose side you took instead of two. And they had the feel of an MMORPG, which is meh for me (if I want I'll go play WoW again).
As I don't like telling people what to think, my advice is to play Act 3 and make up your own mind. But, you did ask, and you have been forewarned.
#23
Posté 30 août 2011 - 03:48
#24
Posté 31 août 2011 - 12:14
#25
Posté 31 août 2011 - 12:31





Retour en haut






