Wow this thread grew while my DSL was down...

[quote]phaonica wrote...
I was attempting to explore whether players find the conflict to seem black and white because of a perceived writing flaw (which could be improved upon in the future) or if it is black and white due to an absolute truth (in which case the choosing of the subject of conflict itself was flawed).[/quote]
Ahh. I misunderstood. Apologies, I was foolishly jumping to the conclusion that the question was about us being unreasonable.
[quote]Follow Me on Twitter wrote...
www.marcandangel.com/2008/02/23/what-is-morality-a-moral-fact-or-opinion/[/quote]
Relative morality is an idiotic concept generally spread by people who realize they can't defend their ethics using anything that makes sense. Using that line of thought, there simply is no such thing as ethics because it's all in our heads and more than likely our own subconscious justifications for the actions of ourselves and those we like or respect. So Adolf Hitler and Mother Teresa were no more right or wrong than each other? BULL****. Right and wrong are in fact very real universal truths. The fact that we aren't sure what exactly those truths are does not make it any less so.
[quote]IanPolaris wrote...
I don't see signs of Cullen changing. He doesn't challenge Meredith's RoA even though he thinks (knows) that it doesn't meet the standard. He has a moral responsibility here and he fails badly.
That tells me that Act III Cullen is not much if any different than Act 1 "Mages aren't people" Cullen.
As for surviving a traumatic situation, shame of the Chatnry for putting him in a position of ANY responbility over mages (same goes for Meredith).[/quote]
AMEN.
I'll never understand all the pro-Cullen garbage. He followed an order of mass murder THAT HE KNEW TO BE UNJUST and I'm supposed to feel sorry for him?!
[quote]Hypothetical mob? The divine have marched on nations for alot less. I think you guys just avoid seeing how great a threat that it actually is.[/quote]
Good. I'm itching for a chance to paint the walls with her innards. But I find this quite an amusing double standard. When Anders destroys one building, it's terrorism and you shouldn't appease terrorists. When the Chantry is going to destroy a major city, woah, better get to appeasing! Destroying cities totally isn't terrorism!
[quote]Xilizhra wrote...
[quote]Most of the players on these boards support the mages. With some even supporting Anders act of terrorism which is absolutely insane.[/quote]
I lol'd.[/quote]
Me too.

[quote]Follow Me on Twitter wrote...
Yep blood magic is not evil. Kirkwall is only built ontop of a lake of blood from slave sacrifices to help the magisters gain some power.[/quote]
Guns in RL have killed many times more people than blood magic in Thedas. Yet cops all carry them. Weird... it's almost like they're a tool that can be used for good OR evil... but that can't be!
[quote]Mage supporters that support anders killing innocents in the chantry but do not think its alright for the templars to kill innocents. Thats just hilarious.[/quote]
What's hilarious is that people think Grand Wizard Elthina was innocent.
[quote]Because turning into a demon does not further the point that the circle mages are indeed practicing blood magic or capable of summoning a demon to aid the and just prove Merediths right?[/quote]
Only if you don't understand the concept of cause and effect.
[quote]Xilizhra wrote...
Let's see. Merrill's good. Alain's good. Grace seemed pretty fine before she was possessed. Hawke herself, potentially. Gascard is redeemable.[/quote]
Jowan is redeemable too, though the Jowan's Intent quest to show that is bugged. If you enable it in the PC version with the console or a mod, you see he ends up sticking his neck out to save random refugees. The question description is gold too, as apparently the Chantry had built up Jowan to be some Irenicus-level evil badass.
[quote]Harid wrote...
I'm done.[/quote]
It's amazing how many posts you made after this.
[quote]Xilizhra wrote...
So, you complain about the lore after not reading the lore, because... what, reading is hard?[/quote]


:lol:

:lol:
I don't think I could aptly describe my appreciation for that post without making it sound like I was making a pass. Well done.
[quote]*stuff about Merrill and the eluvian*[/quote]
Most of the reasons we know it can't end well are things she couldn't know. She wasn't with Tamlen when he saw what was possibly the Black City there, it's unlikely they even knew for sure that the darkspawn appeared in the area because the Dalish warden and Tamlen screwed with the mirror. She certainly couldn't know that Flemeth is some kind of omniscient higher power. Nor could she know what we found in Witch Hunt. Marethari never even seemed to give her an actual reason why it needs to be forgotten.
I'm not saying she was right to screw with the eluvian... I don't think she should have either, but she couldn't know just how badly it might end up like we do.
[quote]Follow Me on Twitter wrote...
And some people do not view the mages as innocent. Deal with it.[/quote]
Translation: "I don't have a sodding clue what the word 'innocent' means!"
[quote]Wulfram wrote...
"Those mages who honor the Maker and keep his laws we welcome as our brothers and sisters."
So said the first Divine. If the Chantry payed a bit more attention to that, we'd be in a much better position
Of course, blowing up the Kirkwall Chantry doesn't help that happen.[/quote]
No... but maybe blowing up the Orlesian Chantry will. *packs another sack of drakestone onto the cart*