Someone With Mass wrote...
GodWood wrote...
All the main characters surviving is just childish and boring.
And a million times more cliche too.
Let me tell you how many times that bland "oh noes, that character died" idea will work. One. Exactly one time.
Where are you getting this idea?
The deaths in A Song of Ice and Fire didn't lose impact after one character died.
And honestly, I have seen that stupid mandatory death idea so often in other fictions like movies and books, it's a breath of fresh air if they don't die to me.
And more fiction has the main characters live.
It is known.
For that matter, what will deaths like that accomplish?
People are already dying by the millions in ME3.
Emotional impact
Someone With Mass wrote...
Let me tell you something.
Virmire. I don't give a **** about who's dying there, because I've seen it so many times to the point where I'm not emotionally invested at all in it, and can just pick the one who I don't like or based on their abilities in combat.
Hell, I even flipped a coin one time.
And?
If I read a book a billion times of course the plot twist is going to mean nothing to me.
That doesn't mean it never should have been there.
Then again. I guess Shepard is so incompetent, he/she can't even lead a team safely if the deaths are so mandatory, because some twerps wants to cry in front of their screens.
I'm starting to think someone can't handle some fictional characters dying.
I'd rather develop a strong bond between characters than just see them all die for absolutely no good reason
You
would develop a strong bond with the character, then they'd die.
That's how one achieves emotional impact.
Modifié par GodWood, 30 août 2011 - 08:31 .