CBGB wrote...
SlimyWatcher wrote...
in the "end" you WILL buy "it" and WILL be
drooling again...again ....and again. "lucky you"... 
I could quit any time. Honest.
SoCalAries wrote...
With the
nonsensical rushed ending of ME3, I'm getting off the bioware bus. It
was nice while it lasted; EA's ruined their work ethic.
After DA2 and ME3, my faith is shaken, if not gone. I'm likely to buy DA3, but I'm also likely to pass on any premium editions and to be more choosy about my DLC's. If they drop the ball on this one, I'll view them more like I view EA: with as much chance of striking out as of hitting a home run.
SoCalAries wrote...
They've been narrowing the scope with each game. It was a diverse world with many issues and the threat of darkspawn. Now it's all about templars & mages.
I wonder if when they say 'Dragon Age III’s story will centre around 'saving the world from itself,'' if it could mean a fight over the seeping of the Fade into Thedas. It'd be a tough choice to close - or remove - that Veil forever.
1. Sure you could.
2. Dragon Age II's story was good, the problems were elsewhere. As for Mass Effect 3, I saw no problem with the ending, people just doomed themselves with high expectation and pre-game headcanoning.
3. I think you're grasping at straws with that theory. The decision about whether or not to close off the fade or tear down the barrier to it would be so drastic that it'd have to be endgame, and Bioware has been clear that DA3 is not the end of the series.
3.2. "Saving the world from itself" is described by the fact that there is an all out war going on between mages and templars, a civil war in Orlais which involves the elves uprising against their oppressors, and quite possibly the Qunari ready to begin their second invasion in Thedas. And never mind the usual threats like darkspawn and whatever Flemeth has planned. To be short: the use fo the word "world" means the people in it, not the planet itself.
Modifié par The Grey Nayr, 29 mai 2013 - 05:05 .