Make a "Dark Side" ending please
#1
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:39
Example:
Harbinger "Hey baby, wana join us?"
Shepard:"Sure as hell!"
*Transforms into Cyborg*
I hope we won`t have just three endings - death, and BLUE/RED sky behind Shepered based on allignment.
#2
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:47
No matter how paragon or renegade, Shepard's task was always to stop the Reapers.
The only thing that comes to mind that could possibly make evil ending in ME3 is that you sacrificed alot of species to destroy Reapers and then humanity would take over galaxy and citadel. (Well Citadel can already be claimed if you killed the Council)
Modifié par Blooddrunk1004, 01 septembre 2011 - 11:53 .
#3
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:49
#4
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:52
#5
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:54
doesnt it also undermine everything you've done in the past 2 games?
it would make about as much sense as han solo randomly shooting luke in the face in the middle of return of the jedi
#6
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 12:02
#7
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 01:27
#8
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 01:33
#9
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 01:37
- Galaxy saved, no single species wields supreme power/authority
- Galaxy saved, humanity survives the conflict as the only real superpower left in the Milky Way
- Galaxy crushed, organic life has not been eradicated, but is (as a whole) close to extinction
- Galaxy saved/crushed, Shepard sacrifices him/herself for the greater good
Modifié par -Skorpious-, 01 septembre 2011 - 01:37 .
#10
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 01:43
Blooddrunk1004 wrote...
Shepard siding with Reapers isn't dark side ending, it's stupid ending.
No matter how paragon or renegade, Shepard's task was always to stop the Reapers.
The only thing that comes to mind that could possibly make evil ending in ME3 is that you sacrificed alot of species to destroy Reapers and then humanity would take over galaxy and citadel. (Well Citadel can already be claimed if you killed the Council)
That's not really evil, it's not you killing the species, and making humans on top also isn't evil.
#11
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 01:43
#12
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 01:47
Given the sheer incompetence of everyone not Shepard, I'd argue that it's the best possible ending for everyone affected.mitthrawuodo wrote...
an ending that sees shepard becomes ruler of the galaxy would imo be a dark side ending
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 01 septembre 2011 - 01:52 .
#13
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 01:48
Besides, the Citadel and Mass Relays were created by the reapers right? They have indoctrination abilities. Whose to say that the citadel didn't have some sort of controlling effects on the inhabitants in the unlikely case that the first wave of the invasion failed. A failsafe.
The theory admittedly might be cliche and stupid, but it would give some sembleance of an explination as to WHY the council flatout ignored shepard's warnings in the first and second game.
#14
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 02:00
Aurora313 wrote...
That's not even trying. I think that at this point, most would welcome council's death.
Besides, the Citadel and Mass Relays were created by the reapers right? They have indoctrination abilities. Whose to say that the citadel didn't have some sort of controlling effects on the inhabitants in the unlikely case that the first wave of the invasion failed. A failsafe.
The theory admittedly might be cliche and stupid, but it would give some sembleance of an explination as to WHY the council flatout ignored shepard's warnings in the first and second game.
Perhaps the Council DOES believe in the reaper threat after the events of ME (Mordin did publish a research paper about indoctrination afterall, so chances are the Salarian councillor must have some vague knowledge of the "Geth" warships), but is waiting for more conclusive evidence besides the ramblings of a half-mad terrorist.
Perhaps they have made preperations (or not) but it is absolutely certain that mass panic would ensue if the Council revealed the reapers existence, so it is a subject that they are not (or are) taking lightly.
#15
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 02:08
-Skorpious- wrote...
*zip*
the ramblings of a half-mad terrorist.
*Zip*
That's not a nice thing to say about Garrus!
... lol.
#16
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 02:14
#17
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 02:15
Just... no.
#18
Guest_christoffee_*
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 02:16
Guest_christoffee_*
#19
Guest_Montezuma IV_*
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 02:20
Guest_Montezuma IV_*
#20
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 02:22
#21
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 03:09
What? No matter what ending happens, Shepard is the character you play with, even if he chooses to go with the reapers (and die), unless Bioware starts chanigng playable characters like Modern Warfare 2.Aurora313 wrote...
Shepard siding with the reapers would be an ultimate game over - or the really, really, really, you-have-to-try-very-hard-to-get-this-ending ending. In my mind, if he had been indoctrinated, then you'd have to fight him as the final boss.
#22
Guest_Montezuma IV_*
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 03:13
Guest_Montezuma IV_*
Killjoy Cutter wrote...
The reapers are capable of rational thought. The "instincts" defense is completely invalid.
Rational is based on your design. They have a different thinking then a human or any other sentient species would. So it is completely valid, thank you. To those ants in the Garden that you just showered with pesticide...we're the Reapers.
Oh, and by-the-way. I do believe Shepard is a pre-determined character. He will always want to stop the Reapers.
Modifié par Montezuma IV, 01 septembre 2011 - 03:19 .
#23
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 03:26
#24
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 03:39
Vampire: The Masquerade Redemption had an ending where the main character became a slave of the main villain, if the player had his character believe the lies.
#25
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 03:46
Alas I doubt something like this would happen.





Retour en haut






