Genlocks are far too big
#1
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 05:07
Their origin is dwarven, they aren't suppose to be bigger then Humans or Hurlocks.
#2
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 05:09
Anyway. I think what was mostly inherited was dwarven sturdiness, not necessarily size.
#3
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 05:16
#4
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 05:21
#5
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 05:55
Their Dwarven ancestry can be seen from thier long arms compared to rest of their body. And isn't it only the Alphas which are larger than humans? (with the Hurlock Alphas even bigger)Porenferser wrote...
Seriously, their Re-Design (in contrary to Hurlocks and Ogres) in Legacy is fine, but they are WAY to big!
Their origin is dwarven, they aren't suppose to be bigger then Humans or Hurlocks.
#6
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 06:22
#7
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 07:25
If anything, the new Genlocks adhere to the codex more than the Origins Genlocks ever did. You really thought that a cucumber skinned Gremlin came from a Dwarven Broodmother?
Genlocks have a build that is similar to the Dwarves, and we know that the taint distorts the size of a Darkspawn in relation to the race it originated from (how else do you explain 20 ft. tall Ogres compared to 8 ft. tall Kossith, or Broodmothers like Laryn when Dwarves are 4.5 feet tall?).
The codex also says the Genlocks rose up out of the earth, and the Genlocks do that just fine.
The only thing I really dislike about the new Genlocks is their armor. I'd prefer it if they had half-assed armor and not just a patch of metal on their arms and head.
That said, I'd prefer the Genlock Alphas be a few inches smaller than a Hurlock grunt, or the Hurlocks be made a few inches taller (with the Alphas also being made taller).
Genlock Alphas have to be bigger though since they command lesser Genlocks, usually through bullying.
#8
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 07:31
#9
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 08:03
Torax wrote...
Shrieks are quite a bit larger than Elves and no one seemed to care about that.
They also moved like primates in Origins, yet no one had a problem with that.
#10
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 08:33
#11
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 08:46
ruleonecardio wrote...
Shrieks didn't get a redesign like the other darkspawn. (or did they, I don't recall seeing a shriek in da2)
There weren't any shrieks in DA2. I haven't played Legacy yet.
#12
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 08:49
#13
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 08:53
#14
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:24
ruleonecardio wrote...
Shrieks didn't get a redesign like the other darkspawn. (or did they, I don't recall seeing a shriek in da2)
They did. They weren't in any part of the game so far, but they will probably be in a DLC.

in the middle area. Needless to say, I disapprove of the new shrieks. There are a few elements that I like about them, but overall I hate the new shrieks
#15
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:27
Zanallen wrote...
The elves were redesigned to look more like shrieks.
No Halla.
#16
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:29
I'll believe it when a dev pops into the thread and says "Yes, dat's the new Shrieks."
Modifié par thats1evildude, 01 septembre 2011 - 11:31 .
#17
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:33
Guest_Puddi III_*
Modifié par Filament, 01 septembre 2011 - 11:34 .
#18
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:44
FieryDove wrote...
Zanallen wrote...
The elves were redesigned to look more like shrieks.
No Halla.
I don't know about that.



Genitivi's codex entry on the halla doesn't say they are both beautiful in the same ways. Just that they're both beautiful.
The Shrieks have more similarites to the DAII elves than the halla do (which unless I'm missing something, they aren't similar). And there are elements of the DAII shrieks that are similar to the DAII elves, but they're horrendously done.
#19
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:46
thats1evildude wrote...
I don't know where you got that image, Ethereal Writer Redux, but assuming it's something recovered from the game files and totally legit, that middle creature looks more like a hurlock rogue.
I'll believe it when a dev pops into the thread and says "Yes, dat's the new Shrieks."
I don't think it's a new hurlock. For one, the Hurlock grunts and alphas have regular ears. For another thing, the Shrieks used the same type of weapons that the Darkspawn above is using.
If they do give the Hurlocks pointy ears, I'll be pissed. They're trying to make the Darkspawn look like a twisted version of each race (though DAII did this horribly), and slapping pointy ears on a Hurlock just makes that goal pointless.
#20
Posté 01 septembre 2011 - 11:51
I'll point out yet again that, even in Origins, darkspawn did not exactly match up to their parent race. Genlocks had pointed ears and dwarves do not. Hurlocks had NO ears while humans do.
Modifié par thats1evildude, 02 septembre 2011 - 12:24 .
#21
Posté 02 septembre 2011 - 12:13
@whykickyouwhy ~ you forgot too many twinkies
#22
Posté 02 septembre 2011 - 08:41
^at least Sandal can't, at this point, though that's debatable.
#23
Posté 02 septembre 2011 - 08:47
All the emissaries encountered in DA2 were of Elven origin.thats1evildude wrote...
ruleonecardio wrote...
Shrieks didn't get a redesign like the other darkspawn. (or did they, I don't recall seeing a shriek in da2)
There weren't any shrieks in DA2. I haven't played Legacy yet.
#24
Posté 02 septembre 2011 - 09:06
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
All the emissaries encountered in DA2 were of Elven origin.
Are you certain? Because that would be a significant retcon from the first game, where the emissaries were all hurlocks or genlocks. What are you basing that on?
#25
Posté 02 septembre 2011 - 12:34





Retour en haut







