Aller au contenu

Photo

Smudboys Dragon Age 2 Plot Analysis


163 réponses à ce sujet

#126
BubbleDncr

BubbleDncr
  • Members
  • 2 209 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

I watched part one and thought it was decent. But during part 2, I had to stop watching it. I don't agree with anything he said, and it was annoying to hear him talk about how there was no point to All That Remains.

It had a point, and I personally found it very emotionally moving. It seems to me like he's just a guy who didn't like DA2 as much as Origins, and this video is his means to try and justify his disappointment by sounding knowledgeable on the subject.


1:it sounds like you dont agree with him because you dont want even belive anything he says since its different then you.
2:no one cares how the game made you feel since thats only YOUR opinion,and i only say this because you imply that if he feels its bad hes wrong but if i like it im right.


I'm allowed to believe he's wrong and not want to listen to him explain his opinions. It's the same as someone not wanting to watch Fox News. 

And I could say, I don't care how the game made HIM feel since that's only HIS opinion. 

#127
Nationalcity1

Nationalcity1
  • Members
  • 18 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Smudboy, I really dislike him. The guys an arse and doesn't take criticism of his own work well.


you mean when he defended his m.e.2 videos from the petty ramblings of the other guy.

Squee119?
I thought his response (squee) was lacking in many areas, I didn't watch all of Smudboys rebuttal but what I did see was fine, if presented in his usual "I'm better than you" style, which I can't fault him for because it's just how he talks.

No I mean he blocked me and deleted all my comments because I used the phrase "straight off the bat". At least that's what he claimed, before being blocked he would respond to a comment, then delete it and his own, only blocking me when I called him up on it.
In my  dealing with Smudboy he acted like a ******.


you hate him because he blocked you and removed your comments,has it crossed your mind that he found you to be annoying and did what he is allowed to do on his page?


All i gotta say is if you cant stand the heat get outta the kitchen.
It's not the first time smud has blocked someone for saying something he doesn't wanna hear and it sure wont be the last that's why I give the guy no credit for anything he says anymore...

Modifié par Nationalcity1, 11 septembre 2011 - 12:43 .


#128
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

Nationalcity1 wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Smudboy, I really dislike him. The guys an arse and doesn't take criticism of his own work well.


you mean when he defended his m.e.2 videos from the petty ramblings of the other guy.

Squee119?
I thought his response (squee) was lacking in many areas, I didn't watch all of Smudboys rebuttal but what I did see was fine, if presented in his usual "I'm better than you" style, which I can't fault him for because it's just how he talks.

No I mean he blocked me and deleted all my comments because I used the phrase "straight off the bat". At least that's what he claimed, before being blocked he would respond to a comment, then delete it and his own, only blocking me when I called him up on it.
In my  dealing with Smudboy he acted like a ******.


you hate him because he blocked you and removed your comments,has it crossed your mind that he found you to be annoying and did what he is allowed to do on his page?


All i gotta say is if you cant stand the heat get outta the kitchen.
It's not the first time smud has blocked someone for saying something he doesn't wanna hear and it sure wont be the last that's why I give the guy no credit for anything he says anymore...


think of it this way if he found it to be off topic or just the mundane comments tey why wouldn't he use the powers he is given.

#129
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

BubbleDncr wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

I watched part one and thought it was decent. But during part 2, I had to stop watching it. I don't agree with anything he said, and it was annoying to hear him talk about how there was no point to All That Remains.

It had a point, and I personally found it very emotionally moving. It seems to me like he's just a guy who didn't like DA2 as much as Origins, and this video is his means to try and justify his disappointment by sounding knowledgeable on the subject.


1:it sounds like you dont agree with him because you dont want even belive anything he says since its different then you.
2:no one cares how the game made you feel since thats only YOUR opinion,and i only say this because you imply that if he feels its bad hes wrong but if i like it im right.


I'm allowed to believe he's wrong and not want to listen to him explain his opinions. It's the same as someone not wanting to watch Fox News. 

And I could say, I don't care how the game made HIM feel since that's only HIS opinion. 

yes you are aloud to not have to listen but since you chose to watch it and you chose to say "i dont agree" but that is still just YOUR opinion,so dont try to make it seem like your the most important person in the world and that no one else matters and your always right,so so thanks that you proved me wrong(sarcasm).

#130
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 995 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Nationalcity1 wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Smudboy, I really dislike him. The guys an arse and doesn't take criticism of his own work well.


you mean when he defended his m.e.2 videos from the petty ramblings of the other guy.

Squee119?
I thought his response (squee) was lacking in many areas, I didn't watch all of Smudboys rebuttal but what I did see was fine, if presented in his usual "I'm better than you" style, which I can't fault him for because it's just how he talks.

No I mean he blocked me and deleted all my comments because I used the phrase "straight off the bat". At least that's what he claimed, before being blocked he would respond to a comment, then delete it and his own, only blocking me when I called him up on it.
In my  dealing with Smudboy he acted like a ******.


you hate him because he blocked you and removed your comments,has it crossed your mind that he found you to be annoying and did what he is allowed to do on his page?


All i gotta say is if you cant stand the heat get outta the kitchen.
It's not the first time smud has blocked someone for saying something he doesn't wanna hear and it sure wont be the last that's why I give the guy no credit for anything he says anymore...


think of it this way if he found it to be off topic or just the mundane comments tey why wouldn't he use the powers he is given.


They obviously weren't off topic if they were talking about his review and the contents of it.

#131
Sabariel

Sabariel
  • Members
  • 2 826 messages

TheEndOfAllThings wrote...

As I saw it was being done in the ME3 forums, I thought I'd also do it here. Smudboy is amazing at picking the faults in games and absolutely rips DA2 apart.

Enjoy. www.youtube.com/watch


Agreed with some of his points, disagreed with others, and sometimes thought that he had no idea what in the flying hell he was talking about :D

#132
BubbleDncr

BubbleDncr
  • Members
  • 2 209 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

I watched part one and thought it was decent. But during part 2, I had to stop watching it. I don't agree with anything he said, and it was annoying to hear him talk about how there was no point to All That Remains.

It had a point, and I personally found it very emotionally moving. It seems to me like he's just a guy who didn't like DA2 as much as Origins, and this video is his means to try and justify his disappointment by sounding knowledgeable on the subject.


1:it sounds like you dont agree with him because you dont want even belive anything he says since its different then you.
2:no one cares how the game made you feel since thats only YOUR opinion,and i only say this because you imply that if he feels its bad hes wrong but if i like it im right.


I'm allowed to believe he's wrong and not want to listen to him explain his opinions. It's the same as someone not wanting to watch Fox News. 

And I could say, I don't care how the game made HIM feel since that's only HIS opinion. 

yes you are aloud to not have to listen but since you chose to watch it and you chose to say "i dont agree" but that is still just YOUR opinion,so dont try to make it seem like your the most important person in the world and that no one else matters and your always right,so so thanks that you proved me wrong(sarcasm).


I never said I'm the most important person in the world or that I'm always right, I simply stated my opinion, as countless other people on this thread have also done. Some agree with him, and others, like me, disagree with him. 

And in the future, please try and use proper grammer when picking fights with people. It will help them understand you better, and take you more seriously. 

Modifié par BubbleDncr, 11 septembre 2011 - 04:28 .


#133
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

BubbleDncr wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

I watched part one and thought it was decent. But during part 2, I had to stop watching it. I don't agree with anything he said, and it was annoying to hear him talk about how there was no point to All That Remains.

It had a point, and I personally found it very emotionally moving. It seems to me like he's just a guy who didn't like DA2 as much as Origins, and this video is his means to try and justify his disappointment by sounding knowledgeable on the subject.


1:it sounds like you dont agree with him because you dont want even belive anything he says since its different then you.
2:no one cares how the game made you feel since thats only YOUR opinion,and i only say this because you imply that if he feels its bad hes wrong but if i like it im right.


I'm allowed to believe he's wrong and not want to listen to him explain his opinions. It's the same as someone not wanting to watch Fox News. 

And I could say, I don't care how the game made HIM feel since that's only HIS opinion. 

yes you are aloud to not have to listen but since you chose to watch it and you chose to say "i dont agree" but that is still just YOUR opinion,so dont try to make it seem like your the most important person in the world and that no one else matters and your always right,so so thanks that you proved me wrong(sarcasm).


I never said I'm the most important person in the world or that I'm always right, I simply stated my opinion, as countless other people on this thread have also done. Some agree with him, and others, like me, disagree with him. 

And in the future, please try and use proper grammer when picking fights with people. It will help them understand you better, and take you more seriously. 

i know you didn't sayit, but you IMPLIED it with this whole my opinion is right and his opinion is wrong thing.now im not saying your opion is wrong in your own opinion but to say his OPINION is wrong is just wrong. to reiterate dont make it seem like his opinion is fact.

#134
Everwarden

Everwarden
  • Members
  • 1 296 messages

BubbleDncr wrote...

And I could say, I don't care how the game made HIM feel since that's only HIS opinion. 


Almost all of the video is objective analysis, not simply opinion. 

All in all, excellent review. Though a bit too narrow in scope, as there were a lot of mechanical problems in addition to the narrative ones.

#135
Boiny Bunny

Boiny Bunny
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages

Everwarden wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

And I could say, I don't care how the game made HIM feel since that's only HIS opinion. 


Almost all of the video is objective analysis, not simply opinion. 

All in all, excellent review. Though a bit too narrow in scope, as there were a lot of mechanical problems in addition to the narrative ones.


Indeed - much of what he talks about is not subjective at all, meaning opinion is irrelevant to those points.

#136
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

Boiny Bunny wrote...

Everwarden wrote...

BubbleDncr wrote...

And I could say, I don't care how the game made HIM feel since that's only HIS opinion. 


Almost all of the video is objective analysis, not simply opinion. 

All in all, excellent review. Though a bit too narrow in scope, as there were a lot of mechanical problems in addition to the narrative ones.


Indeed - much of what he talks about is not subjective at all, meaning opinion is irrelevant to those points.

too bad peoples feelings get in the way of them seeing this.

#137
csfteeeer

csfteeeer
  • Members
  • 1 594 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

furryrage59 wrote...

jbrand2002uk wrote...

While i agree DA2 has a fair few flaws that should have been done better Origins and its DLC has just as many flaws and is made even more horrendous by the fact it had a 3-4 year Dev cycle,hopefully the mistakes from both games will be rectified by DA3 but it would be unrealistic to expect them to please everyone when EA has their hands on the wallet and lets be honest EA has never been any good at doing anything other than Genre hybrids( notice in the tiger woods games how physics sometimes go out the window)

Alas whatever DA3 turns out to be im sure there will be many things that narks off the DAO fans
as the Fanbase is so much more polorized then any other group i've encounterd


Origins had nowhere near as many flaws as DA:2, that is a ridiculous thing to say.


yes it did....

The pacing problems are horrendous, the characters outside Alistair and somewhat Morrigan don't matter in th eplot, the plot lacks focus in the midgame, the plot is cliched as hell, Loghain is a very weak villian with illogical motives, the plot is very predictable, choices only matter in th eend for th emost part.

DAII had a overall great story but with rough edges that every RPG has (and it was rushed), could have it been even better? Yes....but the story is very unconventional and plays by different rules. Also the story was mismarketed, it NEVER really was about Hawke's "Rise To Power", it NEVER really was about his or her family either, it was about how much blame Hawke should take for the conflict. THATS the story. The story requires more attention being paid. In fact, what I thought were plot holes the first tome through was filled in my second playthrough.

The problems with the story was more around too much exposition of the first act, and the rushed nature of the third. The set up and the final mission was great (except for Orsino....but boy does DXHR's Zhao Yun Ru surpass him in shallowness) it just wasn't fleshed out enough and Meredith's motives are only talked about if the player sided with her at the beginning of the act.

And this smud..guy is an idiot....no foreshadowing for the sibling in the deep roads?...wow, what a moron (hint see scene before the deep roads). Doesn't realize Emeric was killed? Moron. Stopped watching during the second vid.

1.loghain is actually a good villian and it seems illogical because he is losing his mind and not thinking clearly.
2.d.a.2 story is not great in any form since its 3 short stories that are barely connect and and about 10 or so random subplots that end and restart again at random times.
3.there are still plot wholes no matter how times you play.
4.what it was about and what they advertised it about two different things but it was what they said it was going to be.
5.they also said it was a more personal story about hawke and his family so once again what they said and what it was are two different things.
6.you dont need to pay more attention to see the story isn't deep and doesn't always make sense.
7.the first act was do all the sidequest and then go to the deep roads,the second act is the best act but thats still not saying much since it doesn't always make sense,and act 3 was bad all around she wants all mages killed because they could all be blood mages so in repsonse the mages all use blood magic even if you side with the mages so uh DERP.
8.insulting him only helps suppourt the fact that you have no real argument and are just b.s.ing your argument.



1. Meredith can be described that way too. In fact, despite the insanity from the artifiact, she is justified in her cause. Loghain isn't, he is just an idiot.
2. The stories do connect, you haven't been paying attention. Not only do that influence things later, these storys actually converge. Notice how the Sheparding Wolves and the Unbriddled Rescue plotlines converge in Following the Qun. Its far from random, its just unconventional. This isn't Legend of Mana. Also, the stories connect in theme as well. Really DAO is a bunch of random stories in the midgame!!!!!
3. Not very many if you fully explore the game.
4. Just because the game is marketed one way doesn't mean its just like it. In fact, the blame should go to the marketing, not the writers.
5. It is a more personal story despite the family not being the main plot focus point.
6. I paid more attention and fully explored the dialogue, 98% of it DOES make sense.
7. So the anatagonists can't be right? They must always be wrong....lol.
8. When you get the facts wrong, you have no real argument.


Lol.

1.
Loghain is paranoid for what he went through, your fanboyism for DA2 is beyond measures.
There is no reasoning behind Meredith, she's just F***ing crazy because of an Amulate, That's the villian.
2.
No it isn't.
But let's follow your logic:
DAO's stories are similar in the fact that you have to scratch people's back, so they can scratch yours, and they all connect at the end because the armies go to Denerim and fight.
Not the best reasoning but hey, that's your reasoning.
3.
lol.
4.
Huh.... yes, it kinda is, or should.
If someone says Origins's story is actually about Growing up and understanding the meaning of life, that would be lying, but maybe that's just the way he wanted to see it, but it doesn't change the truth.
DA2's story is supposed to be about Hawke's Rise to Power, that's what they said it was, that's what it should be, but it's such a badly done mess that it doesn't F***ing what to do, you can assume otherwise, but they said it was about that, so that's where i'll be basing it on.
5.
If it was a personal story, then the character should have a bigger character Development.
Something, maybe some storyline ABOUT the character (not surrounding the character), like Geralt's Amnesia and search for answers and a way to recover his memory.
Hawke doesn't have this, The only that would be personal would be All that Remains, but that's very bare bones, since that doesn't change him at all as a character (and do not DARE to give me the "YOURE TEH KHARACTER" Bull****)
I'm glad that BioWare won't be making a similar story for DA3 (they have said it would be something about Saving the world from itself), they simply aren't made for this kind of story.

Not gonna reply to the other 3 cause i don't need to, but while i'm at it i'll also answer to some of your complains with DAO:

1. Well that's an opinion
2. This isn't a flaw, and even if it was it can be overlooked, most great games that are party based do not have companions that are important to the plot, Unless you're referring to JRPGs, which i haven't played many but i've heard they have a system similar to companions, so maybe you're talking about that, but this isn't a JRPG and other WRPGs have had this and have still gone down in time as classics (PS:T, BG2...).
3. What the F**k are you talking about? the hole it's like "Hey i need your help cause i want to stop the blight", "ok, but help me first", "alright, but you'll help me", the rest would be a side story, but it's there.
You're just lying desperately now.
4. Well, alright, i'll give you that one, but whether that's bad or not, that's subjective.
Many Great Film and Games have had cliched stories (Ever heard of a movie called ROCKY? for example)
5. Not true, if you removed your fanboy goggles, you would see that.
He is paranoid, he had to go through many things, and effectively lost any type of trust he could have ever had for the Orlesians, which Cailan was dealing with, and this insanity drove him to do many things.
You're defending Meredith, this shows your just a hypocrite, since shes crazy too, but at least Loghain has a story rather than just "Crazy cause this little sword told me to".
I'm not as much into Loghain's story and reasoning as much as i would like to, so i'm sure somebody who likes him could give you a better explanation.
6. I Repeat, have you ever heard of a Movie Called ROCKY?
7. That's not a flaw, most games have this(MOST, not all), it's the illusion of Choice that matters, and DAO has one, unlike DA2 which doesn't give a S**t.

Modifié par csfteeeer, 12 septembre 2011 - 06:15 .


#138
Knight Templar_

Knight Templar_
  • Members
  • 263 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

you hate him because he blocked you and removed your comments,has it crossed your mind that he found you to be annoying and did what he is allowed to do on his page?


Do you understand what my point is?

I think he is a jerk, he acted like a jerk without any justification, he didn't say he disliked me or found me annoying to begin with, he just removed comments after responding to them. If he idsliked me why do that? Why then jusitfy blocking me so weakly?
He was being an ****, my opinion of him is that he is an **** and didn't like the points I rased. I will point out that other comments were left behind, but only those that praised him with generics such as "great video". This was back before many people took intrest.

That he is able to block and delete comments is in no way a reason to do so, saying "he can do whatever he wants with his channel" doesn't mean what he wants to do isn't prickish.

EDIT: I think I should be clear I agree with much/some of what Smudboys says, I think he takes his points a bit far here and there but most of his opinions have a solid grounding in fact, making any disagreement simply that. The best point he ever made was when he asked where we got a seeker drone for Moridn to study, I felt like a moron when I caught that my second run through because the game expected me not to notice, and I didn't. But some of what he says I find to be wrong, and when I pointed these things out he decided to remove such comments and eventually block me, that is not the act of a reasonable person open to discussion. 


so people who are jerks now need a reason to be a jerk?also no poop he took your comments down and blocked you since he didn't want to see your critism since he doesn't have to since he is the admin of his own page and can use his admin powers since its not like he could deal with every fanboy that entered the door to his domain.

So you agree he is an intellectually dishonest ******?
My point is he is a ****** and lacks intellectually integrity, that there is no law or rule preventing his actions is irrelvent and I have no idea why you think otherwise. 

If he didn't want people to notice his mistakes, he should correct them, not hide the fact they exist.

#139
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

csfteeeer wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

furryrage59 wrote...

jbrand2002uk wrote...

While i agree DA2 has a fair few flaws that should have been done better Origins and its DLC has just as many flaws and is made even more horrendous by the fact it had a 3-4 year Dev cycle,hopefully the mistakes from both games will be rectified by DA3 but it would be unrealistic to expect them to please everyone when EA has their hands on the wallet and lets be honest EA has never been any good at doing anything other than Genre hybrids( notice in the tiger woods games how physics sometimes go out the window)

Alas whatever DA3 turns out to be im sure there will be many things that narks off the DAO fans
as the Fanbase is so much more polorized then any other group i've encounterd


Origins had nowhere near as many flaws as DA:2, that is a ridiculous thing to say.


yes it did....

The pacing problems are horrendous, the characters outside Alistair and somewhat Morrigan don't matter in th eplot, the plot lacks focus in the midgame, the plot is cliched as hell, Loghain is a very weak villian with illogical motives, the plot is very predictable, choices only matter in th eend for th emost part.

DAII had a overall great story but with rough edges that every RPG has (and it was rushed), could have it been even better? Yes....but the story is very unconventional and plays by different rules. Also the story was mismarketed, it NEVER really was about Hawke's "Rise To Power", it NEVER really was about his or her family either, it was about how much blame Hawke should take for the conflict. THATS the story. The story requires more attention being paid. In fact, what I thought were plot holes the first tome through was filled in my second playthrough.

The problems with the story was more around too much exposition of the first act, and the rushed nature of the third. The set up and the final mission was great (except for Orsino....but boy does DXHR's Zhao Yun Ru surpass him in shallowness) it just wasn't fleshed out enough and Meredith's motives are only talked about if the player sided with her at the beginning of the act.

And this smud..guy is an idiot....no foreshadowing for the sibling in the deep roads?...wow, what a moron (hint see scene before the deep roads). Doesn't realize Emeric was killed? Moron. Stopped watching during the second vid.

1.loghain is actually a good villian and it seems illogical because he is losing his mind and not thinking clearly.
2.d.a.2 story is not great in any form since its 3 short stories that are barely connect and and about 10 or so random subplots that end and restart again at random times.
3.there are still plot wholes no matter how times you play.
4.what it was about and what they advertised it about two different things but it was what they said it was going to be.
5.they also said it was a more personal story about hawke and his family so once again what they said and what it was are two different things.
6.you dont need to pay more attention to see the story isn't deep and doesn't always make sense.
7.the first act was do all the sidequest and then go to the deep roads,the second act is the best act but thats still not saying much since it doesn't always make sense,and act 3 was bad all around she wants all mages killed because they could all be blood mages so in repsonse the mages all use blood magic even if you side with the mages so uh DERP.
8.insulting him only helps suppourt the fact that you have no real argument and are just b.s.ing your argument.



1. Meredith can be described that way too. In fact, despite the insanity from the artifiact, she is justified in her cause. Loghain isn't, he is just an idiot.
2. The stories do connect, you haven't been paying attention. Not only do that influence things later, these storys actually converge. Notice how the Sheparding Wolves and the Unbriddled Rescue plotlines converge in Following the Qun. Its far from random, its just unconventional. This isn't Legend of Mana. Also, the stories connect in theme as well. Really DAO is a bunch of random stories in the midgame!!!!!
3. Not very many if you fully explore the game.
4. Just because the game is marketed one way doesn't mean its just like it. In fact, the blame should go to the marketing, not the writers.
5. It is a more personal story despite the family not being the main plot focus point.
6. I paid more attention and fully explored the dialogue, 98% of it DOES make sense.
7. So the anatagonists can't be right? They must always be wrong....lol.
8. When you get the facts wrong, you have no real argument.


Lol.

1.
Loghain is paranoid for what he went through, your fanboyism for DA2 is beyond measures.
There is no reasoning behind Meredith, she's just F***ing crazy because of an Amulate, That's the villian.
2.
No it isn't.
But let's follow your logic:
DAO's stories are similar in the fact that you have to scratch people's back, so they can scratch yours, and they all connect at the end because the armies go to Denerim and fight.
Not the best reasoning but hey, that's your reasoning.
3.
lol.
4.
Huh.... yes, it kinda is, or should.
If someone says Origins's story is actually about Growing up and understanding the meaning of life, that would be lying, but maybe that's just the way he wanted to see it, but it doesn't change the truth.
DA2's story is supposed to be about Hawke's Rise to Power, that's what they said it was, that's what it should be, but it's such a badly done mess that it doesn't F***ing what to do, you can assume otherwise, but they said it was about that, so that's where i'll be basing it on.
5.
If it was a personal story, then the character should have a bigger character Development.
Something, maybe some storyline ABOUT the character (not surrounding the character), like Geralt's Amnesia and search for answers and a way to recover his memory.
Hawke doesn't have this, The only that would be personal would be All that Remains, but that's very bare bones, since that doesn't change him at all as a character (and do not DARE to give me the "YOURE TEH KHARACTER" Bull****)
I'm glad that BioWare won't be making a similar story for DA3 (they have said it would be something about Saving the world from itself), they simply aren't made for this kind of story.

Not gonna reply to the other 3 cause i don't need to, but while i'm at it i'll also answer to some of your complains with DAO:

1. Well that's an opinion
2. This isn't a flaw, and even if it was it can be overlooked, most great games that are party based do not have companions that are important to the plot, Unless you're referring to JRPGs, which i haven't played many but i've heard they have a system similar to companions, so maybe you're talking about that, but this isn't a JRPG and other WRPGs have had this and have still gone down in time as classics (PS:T, BG2...).
3. What the F**k are you talking about? the hole it's like "Hey i need your help cause i want to stop the blight", "ok, but help me first", "alright, but you'll help me", the rest would be a side story, but it's there.
You're just lying desperately now.
4. Well, alright, i'll give you that one, but whether that's bad or not, that's subjective.
Many Great Film and Games have had cliched stories (Ever heard of a movie called ROCKY? for example)
5. Not true, if you removed your fanboy goggles, you would see that.
He is paranoid, he had to go through many things, and effectively lost any type of trust he could have ever had for the Orlesians, which Cailan was dealing with, and this insanity drove him to do many things.
You're defending Meredith, this shows your just a hypocrite, since shes crazy too, but at least Loghain has a story rather than just "Crazy cause this little sword told me to".
I'm not as much into Loghain's story and reasoning as much as i would like to, so i'm sure somebody who likes him could give you a better explanation.
6. I Repeat, have you ever heard of a Movie Called ROCKY?
7. That's not a flaw, most games have this(MOST, not all), it's the illusion of Choice that matters, and DAO has one, unlike DA2 which doesn't give a S**t.


First set...

1. Guess you missed the part where Meredith's crusade is fueled by the loss of her sister, who turned into an abomination that massacred many people including her entire family...yep, she has no good reason to do what she is doing...lol. Guess, you are getting the facts wrong, like that reviewer being discussed.
2. Do the cut test....you can cut whole DAO mid game plotlines out (other than the Redcliffe one) and not affect the plot line of DAO, other than the loss of fodder. Cut  many DAII plotlines and quests out and the plot will be majorly affected.
3. Than what plot holes then???
4. Just because it is in advertising materials doesn't make it the case. The frame story IS NOT about Hawke's rise to power, it is only PART of it. The story IS CLEARLY about the level of responsibility that is placed on Hawke for what happened. In fact, Hawke is powerless if he chooses mages in the end. Notice how in the VERY beginning, Cassandra accuses Hawke of starting the conflict, however, by the end of Varric's story on him or her, Cassandra realizes that he or she is NOT to blame and in fact she calls him or her, "a hero".
5. Personal stories can extend beyond the protagonist. It was also Avelines, and Varrics, and Merrill's stories and struggles as well. And yes, you have control over Hawke's development,, PLAIN AND SIMPLE, just like you have control over Jensen's development in the new Deus Ex to either reject or accept his augmentations. When a developer allows you to set the  personality of the character, it IS a valid argument to say that th epkayer has control of his or her development And really, a character does not have to change to develop and can also change in a more subtle way.

1. And when the midgame forgets the threat and basically tells independant stories (even the Dwarven one despite the Darkspawn), thats bad pacing. something the midgames in KOTOR and the first Mass Effect didnt do.
2. PST characters are not only involved in the plot, some were involved with the Nameless One in his past lives. In BGII, some companions were involved in the plot, some weren't. There is definitely more major characters than others. Ultima had most party memebers involved in the plot, so did the KOTORs (especially the second). Jade Empire, yep, the first Mass Effect, yep. The characters are the plot in the second game. Most WRPGs have their characters involved in the plot. Thats the weakness DAO has, only Alistair and in some cases Morrigan matter.
3. No, lets compare the mid game of DAO to the midgames of KOTOR and Mass Effect....in KOTOR, you are given the task of  finding star maps HOWEVER, you are also reminded of the threat and the threat was fleshed out during the mid game. Also mid way through, the threat kidnaps you and you learn who you really are. Thats a focused non linear storytelling. All four planets not only deal in getting the plot coupons, but deal in the Sith and their allies as well. You constantly deal with the Sith in almost every element of the game. In Mass Effect, all midgame planets deal with the threat and you have to fight geth in every mid game quest planet. So Feros, Noveria, and Virimire all deal with Saren and his geth. Now lets look at DAO, the ONLY thing connecting them to the main Darkspawn threat is the treaty, thats it. They are their own stories and thats what weakens the main narrative. In fact, the only Darkspawn in the mid game main quests are in the Dwarven section, however, they are not the main focus,
4. First off Rocky subverted cliche with its ending. Second, while using cliches isn't all bad in itself, having absolutely almost no originality in the plotline is a problem. While other Bioware games use cliched parts in their stories, the sum of the parts are more original. Mass Effect and Jade Empire are examples of this. DAO was just a LOTR meets SOIAF ripoff. There is nothing original about it.
5. And once again...



And really, Loghain has FAR less sense in what he is doing than Meredith does.
6. And once again, how is Rocky losing predictable. Bad example.
7. So, the fate of my sibling doesn't matter, so how my companions develop doesn't matter, so who I choose in the end doesn't matter, Anders fate.....really, in th elong run choices in DAII may matter a lot, who is too say they won't matter in DAIII or an expansion. Its better than sloppy ending cards that can easily get retconned. In fact, ME2 had a very similiar ending, where is the whining with that ending.

#140
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

you hate him because he blocked you and removed your comments,has it crossed your mind that he found you to be annoying and did what he is allowed to do on his page?


Do you understand what my point is?

I think he is a jerk, he acted like a jerk without any justification, he didn't say he disliked me or found me annoying to begin with, he just removed comments after responding to them. If he idsliked me why do that? Why then jusitfy blocking me so weakly?
He was being an ****, my opinion of him is that he is an **** and didn't like the points I rased. I will point out that other comments were left behind, but only those that praised him with generics such as "great video". This was back before many people took intrest.

That he is able to block and delete comments is in no way a reason to do so, saying "he can do whatever he wants with his channel" doesn't mean what he wants to do isn't prickish.

EDIT: I think I should be clear I agree with much/some of what Smudboys says, I think he takes his points a bit far here and there but most of his opinions have a solid grounding in fact, making any disagreement simply that. The best point he ever made was when he asked where we got a seeker drone for Moridn to study, I felt like a moron when I caught that my second run through because the game expected me not to notice, and I didn't. But some of what he says I find to be wrong, and when I pointed these things out he decided to remove such comments and eventually block me, that is not the act of a reasonable person open to discussion. 


so people who are jerks now need a reason to be a jerk?also no poop he took your comments down and blocked you since he didn't want to see your critism since he doesn't have to since he is the admin of his own page and can use his admin powers since its not like he could deal with every fanboy that entered the door to his domain.

So you agree he is an intellectually dishonest ******?
My point is he is a ****** and lacks intellectually integrity, that there is no law or rule preventing his actions is irrelvent and I have no idea why you think otherwise. 

If he didn't want people to notice his mistakes, he should correct them, not hide the fact they exist.



no i argue that hes human in the way that he didn't or couldn't deal with dozens of people at once and he really would't deal with those that just insult him,but i digress the truth is i have seen people get banned for not liking chocolate milk (to be honest who doesn't like chocolate milk?) and all that shows is people get banned for small and strange things sometimes and people need to deal with that.

#141
Reno_Tarshil

Reno_Tarshil
  • Members
  • 537 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

you hate him because he blocked you and removed your comments,has it crossed your mind that he found you to be annoying and did what he is allowed to do on his page?


Do you understand what my point is?

I think he is a jerk, he acted like a jerk without any justification, he didn't say he disliked me or found me annoying to begin with, he just removed comments after responding to them. If he idsliked me why do that? Why then jusitfy blocking me so weakly?
He was being an ****, my opinion of him is that he is an **** and didn't like the points I rased. I will point out that other comments were left behind, but only those that praised him with generics such as "great video". This was back before many people took intrest.

That he is able to block and delete comments is in no way a reason to do so, saying "he can do whatever he wants with his channel" doesn't mean what he wants to do isn't prickish.

EDIT: I think I should be clear I agree with much/some of what Smudboys says, I think he takes his points a bit far here and there but most of his opinions have a solid grounding in fact, making any disagreement simply that. The best point he ever made was when he asked where we got a seeker drone for Moridn to study, I felt like a moron when I caught that my second run through because the game expected me not to notice, and I didn't. But some of what he says I find to be wrong, and when I pointed these things out he decided to remove such comments and eventually block me, that is not the act of a reasonable person open to discussion. 


so people who are jerks now need a reason to be a jerk?also no poop he took your comments down and blocked you since he didn't want to see your critism since he doesn't have to since he is the admin of his own page and can use his admin powers since its not like he could deal with every fanboy that entered the door to his domain.

So you agree he is an intellectually dishonest ******?
My point is he is a ****** and lacks intellectually integrity, that there is no law or rule preventing his actions is irrelvent and I have no idea why you think otherwise. 

If he didn't want people to notice his mistakes, he should correct them, not hide the fact they exist.



no i argue that hes human in the way that he didn't or couldn't deal with dozens of people at once and he really would't deal with those that just insult him,but i digress the truth is i have seen people get banned for not liking chocolate milk (to be honest who doesn't like chocolate milk?) and all that shows is people get banned for small and strange things sometimes and people need to deal with that.


Then he shouldn't have made the video, if he couldn't handle being disagreed with. All this does is prove he's childish and think his opinion is the only right opinion on the matter.

I'm not saying his opinion is wrong because it is his opinion, but if he's going to post a plot analysis, he better be capable of accepting opinions of the opposite variety, otherwise anything he says has no effect at all.

#142
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

Reno_Tarshil wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

you hate him because he blocked you and removed your comments,has it crossed your mind that he found you to be annoying and did what he is allowed to do on his page?


Do you understand what my point is?

I think he is a jerk, he acted like a jerk without any justification, he didn't say he disliked me or found me annoying to begin with, he just removed comments after responding to them. If he idsliked me why do that? Why then jusitfy blocking me so weakly?
He was being an ****, my opinion of him is that he is an **** and didn't like the points I rased. I will point out that other comments were left behind, but only those that praised him with generics such as "great video". This was back before many people took intrest.

That he is able to block and delete comments is in no way a reason to do so, saying "he can do whatever he wants with his channel" doesn't mean what he wants to do isn't prickish.

EDIT: I think I should be clear I agree with much/some of what Smudboys says, I think he takes his points a bit far here and there but most of his opinions have a solid grounding in fact, making any disagreement simply that. The best point he ever made was when he asked where we got a seeker drone for Moridn to study, I felt like a moron when I caught that my second run through because the game expected me not to notice, and I didn't. But some of what he says I find to be wrong, and when I pointed these things out he decided to remove such comments and eventually block me, that is not the act of a reasonable person open to discussion. 


so people who are jerks now need a reason to be a jerk?also no poop he took your comments down and blocked you since he didn't want to see your critism since he doesn't have to since he is the admin of his own page and can use his admin powers since its not like he could deal with every fanboy that entered the door to his domain.

So you agree he is an intellectually dishonest ******?
My point is he is a ****** and lacks intellectually integrity, that there is no law or rule preventing his actions is irrelvent and I have no idea why you think otherwise. 

If he didn't want people to notice his mistakes, he should correct them, not hide the fact they exist.



no i argue that hes human in the way that he didn't or couldn't deal with dozens of people at once and he really would't deal with those that just insult him,but i digress the truth is i have seen people get banned for not liking chocolate milk (to be honest who doesn't like chocolate milk?) and all that shows is people get banned for small and strange things sometimes and people need to deal with that.


Then he shouldn't have made the video, if he couldn't handle being disagreed with. All this does is prove he's childish and think his opinion is the only right opinion on the matter.

I'm not saying his opinion is wrong because it is his opinion, but if he's going to post a plot analysis, he better be capable of accepting opinions of the opposite variety, otherwise anything he says has no effect at all.

if you make a structured counter argument i wouldn't understand but if there 50 people going f**k you,your stupid,or you sound like an idiot,then no duh he wouldn't want to deal with all of those people who are useing just an opinion on the lowest level.

Modifié par Barry Bathernak, 13 septembre 2011 - 09:37 .


#143
Perfect-Kenshin

Perfect-Kenshin
  • Members
  • 976 messages
I particularly like the part where he rips into Gaider. "This response is completely undefendable; you cannot defend bullsh-t" :D

Modifié par Perfect-Kenshin, 13 septembre 2011 - 08:27 .


#144
Knight Templar_

Knight Templar_
  • Members
  • 263 messages

no i argue that hes human in the way that he didn't or couldn't deal with dozens of people at once

So he responded, then deleted the comment?
That makes zero sense, particularly when you consider this was back when he was getting started. There were less than a dozen comments total on his videos. To be fair, he could have just been deleting them all, wait that doesn't excuse it.



and he really would't deal with those that just insult him,

I did not insult him.
You will note my low opinion of him is because of how he acted in responce and that not even he claimed I was insulting, I didn't have any issue with him prior to his actions.


but i digress the truth is i have seen people get banned for not liking chocolate milk (to be honest who doesn't like chocolate milk?) and all that shows is people get banned for small and strange things sometimes and people need to deal with that.

What does this have to do with anything?
Other people are dishonest jerks, so what? It doesn't mean Smudboy suddenly didn't act unreasonable.

Modifié par Knight Templar , 14 septembre 2011 - 03:20 .


#145
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

Knight Templar wrote...



no i argue that hes human in the way that he didn't or couldn't deal with dozens of people at once

So he responded, then deleted the comment?
That makes zero sense, particularly when you consider this was back when he was getting started. There were less than a dozen comments total on his videos. To be fair, he could have just been deleting them all, wait that doesn't excuse it.



and he really would't deal with those that just insult him,

I did not insult him.
You will note my low opinion of him is because of how he acted in responce and that not even he claimed I was insulting, I didn't have any issue with him prior to his actions.


but i digress the truth is i have seen people get banned for not liking chocolate milk (to be honest who doesn't like chocolate milk?) and all that shows is people get banned for small and strange things sometimes and people need to deal with that.

What does this have to do with anything?
Other people are dishonest jerks, so what? It doesn't mean Smudboy suddenly didn't act unreasonable.


you know what your so persistants that it is annoying ,and i can see why he blocked you,and maybe since he blocked you he didn't want to see you commants so he deleted them. so you think maybe that you are to blame for this at least partaly and that he had a reason.

#146
Knight Templar_

Knight Templar_
  • Members
  • 263 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...


you know what your so persistants that it is annoying ,and i can see why he blocked you,and maybe since he blocked you he didn't want to see you commants so he deleted them. so you think maybe that you are to blame for this at least partaly and that he had a reason.

Yeah he had a reason, he didn't want to be shown to be wrong, blaming me for correcting him is silly.

Don't get up on me for persistence when you are just as much in this conversation as I, and he couldn't have known anything about me personally when he deleted comments.
Face it you are utterly wrong on how he acted and why he acted (I get the impression you are not really reading what I post) and are just throwing insults my way with no basis in fact.

Modifié par Knight Templar , 14 septembre 2011 - 09:21 .


#147
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...


you know what your so persistants that it is annoying ,and i can see why he blocked you,and maybe since he blocked you he didn't want to see you commants so he deleted them. so you think maybe that you are to blame for this at least partaly and that he had a reason.

Yeah he had a reason, he didn't want to be shown to be wrong, blaming me for correcting him is silly.

Don't get up on me for persistence when you are just as much in this conversation as I, and he couldn't have known anything about me personally when he deleted comments.
Face it you are utterly wrong on how he acted and why he acted (I get the impression you are not really reading what I post) and are just throwing insults my way with no basis in fact.

now that you bring up why he did it,let me ask what did you do and be specific?

#148
Knight Templar_

Knight Templar_
  • Members
  • 263 messages

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...


you know what your so persistants that it is annoying ,and i can see why he blocked you,and maybe since he blocked you he didn't want to see you commants so he deleted them. so you think maybe that you are to blame for this at least partaly and that he had a reason.

Yeah he had a reason, he didn't want to be shown to be wrong, blaming me for correcting him is silly.

Don't get up on me for persistence when you are just as much in this conversation as I, and he couldn't have known anything about me personally when he deleted comments.
Face it you are utterly wrong on how he acted and why he acted (I get the impression you are not really reading what I post) and are just throwing insults my way with no basis in fact.

now that you bring up why he did it,let me ask what did you do and be specific?


What do you mean "now that you bring that up"? Are you reading my posts?
As for what I said specifically, it was over a year ago (you might recall I said he was only getting started, if you read that) I can't recall in such detail. 

Don't think to use this as some kind of excuse for his actions. Simply that I cannot remember in detail what I said doesn't mean I said something that would earn be a block.

Are you going to keep doing this? Make wild accusations then just move on? If so this isn't going to be a very productive talk, what with you looking for a way to pin his action on me like this.

#149
Barry Bathernak

Barry Bathernak
  • Members
  • 262 messages

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...


you know what your so persistants that it is annoying ,and i can see why he blocked you,and maybe since he blocked you he didn't want to see you commants so he deleted them. so you think maybe that you are to blame for this at least partaly and that he had a reason.

Yeah he had a reason, he didn't want to be shown to be wrong, blaming me for correcting him is silly.

Don't get up on me for persistence when you are just as much in this conversation as I, and he couldn't have known anything about me personally when he deleted comments.
Face it you are utterly wrong on how he acted and why he acted (I get the impression you are not really reading what I post) and are just throwing insults my way with no basis in fact.

now that you bring up why he did it,let me ask what did you do and be specific?


What do you mean "now that you bring that up"? Are you reading my posts?
As for what I said specifically, it was over a year ago (you might recall I said he was only getting started, if you read that) I can't recall in such detail. 

Don't think to use this as some kind of excuse for his actions. Simply that I cannot remember in detail what I said doesn't mean I said something that would earn be a block.

Are you going to keep doing this? Make wild accusations then just move on? If so this isn't going to be a very productive talk, what with you looking for a way to pin his action on me like this.


there is the problem "i can't recall in such detail" if you cant remember then how do you know wasn't offensive,idiotic,offtopic,ect.
and yes i have been reading this but if you cant remeber in DETAIL or show proof then dont complain like he just kicked your dog.

#150
BroBear Berbil

BroBear Berbil
  • Members
  • 1 516 messages
I thought it was a great series of videos and he made a lot of good points. The way the "power" part of the rise to power was absent from the game was one of my bigger gripes with the game's story.

(4:24 - 4:41)

The answer to Laidlaw's question turns out to be "just a title". People respect you and call you champion in Act 3 but you have no influence on the events that play out. You get to run errands for two people and then pick one to follow. What you may achieve in the epilogue is of course never shown and irrelevant since it's temporary. In my opinion if the story was about rising to power then Fable 3, "It's all about powah maaaaaan" did a better job of showing that concept. I don't have any love for Fable 3 I just feel it worked with that premise better albeit in a childish fashion.

And smudboy's description of the last boss being "Saturday morning cartoon crap" was dead on.