163 réponses à ce sujet

[Knight Templar_]

Barry Bathernak wrote...

there is the problem "i can't recall in such detail" if you cant remember then how do you know wasn't offensive,idiotic,offtopic,ect.

For the same reason while you may be unable to remember what you had for breakfast monday last week you know it wasn't whale meat, and you didn't collect it personaly. You do understand how memory works don't you?

and yes i have been reading this

Then why do you think I have only now started talking about why he acted, or suggest he didn't have time to respond, when I already said he did?

but if you cant remeber in DETAIL or show proof then dont complain like he just kicked your dog.

Why would I have proof? Do you think I've spent the last year moaning over what happened, collecting a case to use against him? 
Again, not even smudboy claimed I was insulting and his actions are not in line with such an opinion, so both parties in the event disagree with you and your wild insults have no grounding in what happened.
You're grasping at straws.

Modifié par Knight Templar , 15 septembre 2011 - 11:37 .

[Barry Bathernak]

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

there is the problem "i can't recall in such detail" if you cant remember then how do you know wasn't offensive,idiotic,offtopic,ect.

For the same reason while you may be unable to remember what you had for breakfast monday last week you know it wasn't whale meat, and you didn't collect it personaly. You do understand how memory works don't you?

and yes i have been reading this

Then why do you think I have only now started talking about why he acted, or suggest he didn't have time to respond, when I already said he did?

but if you cant remeber in DETAIL or show proof then dont complain like he just kicked your dog.

Why would I have proof? Do you think I've spent the last year moaning over what happened, collecting a case to use against him? 
Again, not even smudboy claimed I was insulting and his actions are not in line with such an opinion, so both parties in the event disagree with you and your wild insults have no grounding in what happened.
You're grasping at straws.

1. dont use hyperbole on me since not remembering something that got you banned is not the same as what i ate for breakfast last monday, since my breakfast doesn't need context to get the point that it was food,
2. do you think he just didn't like for whatever reason people have for not liking others no matter how small or stupid?since you should.
3.no i dont expect that,i do expect some context other then hearsay since it seams like you just want to paint someone as the devil over something you cant give context,details,or proof.

[Knight Templar_]

Barry Bathernak wrote...

1. dont use hyperbole on me since not remembering something that got you banned is not the same as what i ate for breakfast last monday, since my breakfast doesn't need context to get the point that it was food,

Within the metaphor that argument would only fly if you were accusing me of not having amade a post at all.
It was a year ago, so comparing it to something last week is hardly hyperbole. By your logic is is perfectly valid to claim you kill and eat whales/babies, just as you call me insulting, a fanboy and stupid (to be fair you only implied I was that last one). 

2. do you think he just didn't like for whatever reason people have for not liking others no matter how small or stupid?since you should.

Then why respond? Again, such an argument is not in line with his actions.

3.no i dont expect that,i do expect some context other then hearsay since it seams like you just want to paint someone as the devil over something you cant give context,details,or proof.

I'm not calling him the devil. I'm saying he is dishonest and a jerk. If you do not wich to belive that then it's fine by me. However you are not simply choosing not to belive, you are throwing up excuses, and now they have failed are calling me into question. You are out to prove he didn't act as he did, and doing a very poor job. You have context, the comment was not insulting and he considered it worth responding to, if also worth hiding.

I am responding to your accusations and comments because they are both incorrect and insulting. I don't know why you have such a hard time accepting the guy is a jerk, others have already pointed out he has acted thus before. If you think me not obsessing over this for a year means I'm making this up for siths and giggles then you're free to think that. But it doesn't match up with what is.
<_<
I think we're done here.

[Barry Bathernak]

im just going to give up since you just seem like for lack of a better word buthurt(and im sure ill have to change this eventually).

[Knight Templar_]

Barry Bathernak wrote...

im just going to give up since you just seem like for lack of a better word buthurt(and im sure ill have to change this eventually).

So have you just been trolling me this whole time? it would explain your utter lack of reading comprehension and the way you throw insults my way.

[Barry Bathernak]

Knight Templar wrote...

Barry Bathernak wrote...

im just going to give up since you just seem like for lack of a better word buthurt(and im sure ill have to change this eventually).

So have you just been trolling me this whole time? it would explain your utter lack of reading comprehension and the way you throw insults my way.

no i havn't been trolling i have been trying to figure out why you have been blocked,but since you cant remember in DETAIL and feel as if you couln't of actually done anything and how you hate him i can only come to this point.also the fact that i can respond so you can tell i can read,and i said "for lack of a better word" so yea i still dont have a better word SO GOOD DAY SIR!

[Knight Templar_]

Barry Bathernak wrote...



no i havn't been trolling i have been trying to figure out why you have been blocked

Then you are doing a poor job. I have told you the most likely explination and what happened, and you have done nothing but attempt to blame me. That is not seeking truth, that is possesing a conclusion and attempting to make it real.

but since you cant remember in DETAIL

And it wouldn't make sense if I did. However nobody involved claimed what you did about the event. So the only person with a differing opinion on the subject is the one who learned one year after the fact and decied what was what before knowing a single thing.

and feel as if you couln't of actually done anything

You are the first person to claim I did. You keep missing that point.

and how you hate him

Wrong. This is what I mean, you have decided who I am and how I acted, then started asking questions.

i can only come to this point.also the fact that i can respond so you can tell i can read,and i said "for lack of a better word" so yea i still dont have a better word SO GOOD DAY SIR!

I don't doubt your ability to read at all, I doubt you understand/do so correctly. That's what reading comprehension is. I assumed you were trolling because you called me "butthurt" after I said you are free to think either way, which wouldn't indicate I was overly upset (although I did assume you read the post). If you are not trolling then I am sorry for saying you are. But you've got the cart before the horse if you have any intention of fact-finding, hence getting everything wrong.

Also you have a funny way of "giving up".

[Phaelducan]

JFC Bioware fanboys are crazy. Smudboy's videos aren't analysis, and these threads aren't critiques. CRAZY.

[Tom12]

he has also a lot to say about dragon age 2 lol

[Hatchetman77]

Dragon Age 2 is the most dissapointing thing since my son.

[Barry Bathernak]

Hatchetman77 wrote...

Dragon Age 2 is the most dissapointing thing since my son.

hahahaahahahhahaahahahaahahahaahahahaahahahaahahahaaha...thats just so mean to say your son dissapointed you nearly as much as d.a.2 since thats the most dissapointing thing since the bay of pigs.

[Maconbar]

Hatchetman77 wrote...

Dragon Age 2 is the most dissapointing thing since my son.

My new fav comment on the BSN.

[NeroSparda]

Maconbar wrote...

Hatchetman77 wrote...

Dragon Age 2 is the most dissapointing thing since my son.

My new fav comment on the BSN.

Not as disappointing as Sonic Chronicles.

[The_11thDoctor]

5 out of 5 on Smudboy's vids! Love his stuff cause he thinks and brings up all the questions we do. None of the stories in Bioware games make sense, but they are always done in high quality. You have to read the books to get a good story. That or play a real RPG(JRPG). They're still the best western RPG company out there. Im just waiting for them to get as good as a free to play game... Like Vindictus. It's better in every way minus not all the voice acted scenes. They do have voice acting , but not as heavy. Phantasy Star on PSP was a better game with more options, customization, story, traveling the galaxy, multiplayer, etc. Monster hunter for psp... Valkyria Chronicles 1 for PS3,2-3 on psp... There are a ton of games without a ton of holes in the story and customization. I love Bioware, but there games have a ton of issues. EVERY GAME.