Would you sacrifice Earth if by doing so you could stop the reapers permanently?
#226
Posté 08 septembre 2011 - 03:39
#227
Posté 08 septembre 2011 - 05:26
It is so rare to see this fact bought up on the forums....thank you Medhia and Mauro, I am glad you consider this fact and it's importance also.mauro2222 wrote...
Medhia Nox wrote...
There are 5 million plus animal species and 250,000 plus plant species living on this planet - not just some up-jumped arrogant monkey.
===
No, I would not sacrifice the Earth biosphere to destroy the Reapers.
Lol, so true xD I would do the same
#228
Posté 08 septembre 2011 - 08:15
#229
Posté 08 septembre 2011 - 08:54
Medhia Nox wrote...
There are 5 million plus animal species and 250,000 plus plant species living on this planet - not just some up-jumped arrogant monkey.
*cough* Ape. *cough*
You do raise a valid point, but still the sacrifice of all that life is worth the life of everything else in the galaxy.
Medhia Nox wrote...
This thread is the reason why I cannot wait for planet Earth's genuine extinction cycle to pick humanity.
I really doubt nature will kill us off. We have survived so much crap as a species. However with technology crippling us with every passing year it's not exactly out of the question now. I still think it is far more likely we'll die by our own hands.
Modifié par Computer_God91, 08 septembre 2011 - 08:57 .
#230
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 04:40
#231
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 04:46
My myself? I think so. If it saves the rest of the entire damn galaxy for all time, I'd sacrifice a planet.
You will be missed, vorcha.
#232
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 04:54
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
#233
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 04:59
I don't want to, of course; who honestly wants to watch the entire history of thier species burn? But I would. There are other humans in the galaxy to be considered, not to mention all the other sentient species who would (in theory) be saved.
But if the choice was to watch as the entire galaxy was destroyed planet by planet, species by species, or sacrafice the earth, I'd do it in an instant.
#234
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 06:16
#235
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 06:47
laecraft wrote...
jreezy wrote...
1%>0%LookingGlass93 wrote...
If you sacrifice Earth you're left with less than 1% of the human race.
And 12 > 0. But where are the Protheans now?
Survival of the species is more complicated than simple math. And more variables factor in it than mere numbers. The krogan were very numerous once, and that was what caused their near extinction. The quarians lost their homeworld, yet they survived, even though it's more of an existence on life support than true life.
Some people are making a mistake of thinking that if some of humanity still survives, it's a victory. It is possible to suffer such heavy losses that this "victory" will be too much of a defeat. In our case, the key is our homeworld. If we lose the Earth now, we'll never recover.
While 12 is not a viable gene pool for most species (won't say all becuase I don't know for sure), 7 million is a very viable gene pool for humans. In fact I do believe that 1 million would be a viable gene pool with little to no inbreeding.
Now with this said, yes I would sacrifice Earth for the greater good of the galaxy. Once again 11 billion is a lot less than the trillions lost if the galaxy is wiped out.
#236
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 08:21
IMO any Shep that sacrifices Earth is the worst traitor in (future) human history.
#237
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 08:24
We always got Arcturus station, which pretty much surpased earth in usefullness a long time ago.
#238
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 08:35
...of course. I'd start by sacrificing the Asari >:]
#239
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 08:48
Not much of a choice really.
Stop the Reapers, from coming back to ... well reap.
Or have them wipe us all out.
#240
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 09:38
#241
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 09:55
#242
Posté 09 septembre 2011 - 10:42
Fixers0 wrote...
Sure, no point in wasting your forces trying to save that 'acid waste slum'
We always got Arcturus station, which pretty much surpased earth in usefullness a long time ago.
I'm not sure you understand the implications here. Sacrificing Earth alone will do nothing. Think they just do their deed and stick around tap dancing on buildings forever? You need to destroy the entire system, Acrturus station included. It only has a population of 45,000~. Hardly a giant building block for the future of humanity.
#243
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:17
Medhia Nox wrote...
This thread is the reason why I cannot wait for planet Earth's genuine extinction cycle to pick humanity.
There are 5 million plus animal species and 250,000 plus plant species living on this planet - not just some up-jumped arrogant monkey.
===
Given the hypothetical that my decision alone decides the fate of space faring species...
No, I would not sacrifice the Earth biosphere to destroy the Reapers.
Once the Reapers are done with their cycle - the Earth biosphere will remain and possibly produce another sapient life form, maybe not. Other planets certainly would - and human level intelligence is not "the goal" in my not at all humble opinion.
Perhaps I'm the ultimate Utilitarian - the needs of the many truly outweigh the needs of one talking monkey species.
That isn't to say I wouldn't fight against the Reapers until I was destroyed - but such a simplistic decision of "destroy the Earth biosphere and kill the Reapers" - I could not condemn that level of biodiversity to annihilation (and it's not even extinction - extinction "can" imply that species simply altered a form - like dinosaurs to avians.)
So how would a Utopion species like the Hanar stop the Reaper cycle?... they all sing around a camp fire till Reaper flys bye a couple of times and sees them accomplish nothing due to the fact that WARFARE is what drives technology!
Ok maybe they have a different drive to help their own people instead of building weapons to protect and enslave, so medical tech is pretty good but band aids isn't going to blow Reapers out of space now is it?
#244
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:47
If it is just because it is the option which have the best chances of succes, then I'll just try the other options and make it work.
#245
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 12:03
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Fixers0 wrote...
Sure, no point in wasting your forces trying to save that 'acid waste slum'
We always got Arcturus station, which pretty much surpased earth in usefullness a long time ago.
You are still perpetrating this myth I see.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Without Earth humanity will have no engine to drive its expansion. It will not be able to afford its vast fleet or any new colonies. In a short time its fleets will deteriorate and it will be forced to give up its sovereignty to even be able to afford to defend its shrinking territory.
#246
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 01:33
KotorEffect3 wrote...
I would because I view as stopping the Reapers and the cycle of galactic genocide as more important than the fate of any single species including our own. During the ME games the population of Earth is around 11 billion I believe. There are trillions of people in the galaxy belonging to different advanced civilizations. As much as I would hate to see Earth and humanity in general bite the dust I would do it to save trillions.
Yes I would sacrifice our Home
Sacrificing this beautiful gem we call Earth would be profoundly traumatic to any remaining humans thoughout the galaxy, but Im sure we would recover and rebuild a new home to call our own. Just thinking about is hard enough, I mean deeply.. truly, imagining that thought of destroying the mother of our race that has nurtured humanity for so long... not to mention all the other forms of life on this planet that we share our air with.

Self interest vs self sacrifice... Its a nightmare of a decision but .. a no brainer, sadly it has to be done.
Not cool OP, for such a horrible question<_<
#247
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 02:00
#248
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 02:57
#249
Posté 17 septembre 2011 - 02:34
#250
Posté 17 septembre 2011 - 02:39





Retour en haut







