Would you sacrifice Earth if by doing so you could stop the reapers permanently?
#251
Posté 17 septembre 2011 - 03:18
#252
Posté 18 septembre 2011 - 07:55
#253
Posté 18 septembre 2011 - 07:58
As to sacrificing the entire Quarian species: Yep, before sacrificing Earth, at that.
Modifié par SandTrout, 18 septembre 2011 - 08:23 .
#254
Posté 18 septembre 2011 - 11:48
#255
Posté 18 septembre 2011 - 12:01
#256
Posté 18 septembre 2011 - 12:19
#257
Posté 18 septembre 2011 - 12:25
vvDRUCILLAvv wrote...
Now the real question is would you sacrifice the entire Quarian race (yes that includes Tali) to permanently stop the Reapers
Why should I when there are other and stronger races I can throw at the Reapers instead?
#258
Posté 20 septembre 2011 - 09:48
vvDRUCILLAvv wrote...
Now the real question is would you sacrifice the entire Quarian race (yes that includes Tali) to permanently stop the Reapers
I would burn Thessia, Pavalen, Sur'Kesh, Kahje, Dekuna, Khar'shan, Rannoch and Earth, and 1000 more worlds to ashes before I sacrifice any species that isn't the Batarians. Planets are ground on which to fight for lives.
If this situation came up though, my canonShep would do it. It'd utterly and possibly permanently destroy him, but he'd do it. The defeat of the Reapers is that important.
#259
Posté 20 septembre 2011 - 10:01
That said, for the life of me I can not see how sacrificing Earth would do such a thing, not even in a videogame, so unless we have some, what do you call it here? Deux Ex machina or something like that, I doubt that it will be an option in ME3
Sidenote: Batarians will go out first
Modifié par frozn89, 20 septembre 2011 - 10:04 .
#260
Posté 20 septembre 2011 - 10:13
frozn89 wrote...
Yeah, I would. As a lot of people already have stated, humans live everywhere. Of course, I would try to evacuate as many as possible, but hey, a few must die for the greater good eh? Granted, in the ME universe Earth has tons of humans (11 billion or so?) so a few might be an understatement. However, compared to the rest of the galaxy, it is a small price to pay if it can save the rest of the galaxy by somehow permanently disabling the Reapers.
That said, for the life of me I can not see how sacrificing Earth would do such a thing, not even in a videogame, so unless we have some, what do you call it here? Deux Ex machina or something like that, I doubt that it will be an option in ME3![]()
Sidenote: Batarians will go out first
Only 11 billion? Its surprising they went with such a conservative estimate of populaiton growth over the next hundred and fifty odd years.
http://en.wikipedia....orld_population
"Such variations give long-range predictions to 2150, ranging from population decline to 3.2 billion in the 'low scenario', to high scenarios of 24.8 billion, or soaring to 256 billion"
#261
Posté 29 septembre 2011 - 10:49
#262
Posté 29 septembre 2011 - 11:05
#263
Posté 29 septembre 2011 - 11:11
There are other human colonies so if they are relatively intact, then humanity will survive but they will be weak.KotorEffect3 wrote...
I would because I view as stopping the Reapers and the cycle of galactic genocide as more important than the fate of any single species including our own. During the ME games the population of Earth is around 11 billion I believe. There are trillions of people in the galaxy belonging to different advanced civilizations. As much as I would hate to see Earth and humanity in general bite the dust I would do it to save trillions.
#264
Posté 29 septembre 2011 - 11:26
#265
Posté 29 septembre 2011 - 11:28
If the alternative is to save Earth and only force the Reapers to retreat for a few more years or a few thousand or whatever, knowing that they'll come back and you haven't completely defeat them, then I'd do that. The Council piddled around for YEARS while Shep was warning them, and the Council races need to step up and sacrifice a bit themselves. Humanity's done its part.





Retour en haut






