Grey34 wrote...
haven't we gone through this already? if your worried about inconstancy's why not buy the dlc if not then don't complain about it
This. The books/comics analogy doesn't work, because it's not Shepard at work there. The geth-hunting sequence between ME1 and ME2 is not comparable either, because you also don't roleplay Shep going to the toilet etc., they necessarily have to leave out some of the boring stuff. Lastly, the same goes for what happened before ME1: the story is about Shepard's fight against the reapers, and it would not have been necessary to add Shepard's youth: it's (mostly) irrelevant to the story, and would seem like filler material if it had been in the game.
I don't care so much that the
choice to kill the batarians is forced on you, and I get this is a necessary plot device to get Shepard to earth. What makes me simply angry at BioWare is that this is canon, relevant, and pretty much necessary to have played as Shepard in order to make sense, but that this is all in the form of DLC - which isn't even free. Which means that to play the complete game, you HAVE to pay extra money for DLC. I think Arrival should have been a part of either ME2 or ME3, or, in the worst case, have been FREE DLC. This is part of Mass Effect, cut out to make extra money through DLC.
(And no, I don't mean to start a discussion about DLC: though, like anyone, I prefer free DLC, I'm fine with the Overlord DLC etc. The point is, Arrival is a necessary part of the plot of the ME games, but for the OP and anyone who DID pay for the game, it's not included. It's not like BioWare would go bankrupt if they made Arrival free, but for some reason they decided it was reasonable to charge for it. I disagree.)