83 réponses à ce sujet

[Augustei]

Which one did you pick for those who have played it? And why did you pick it?

At the moment i'm deciding between either Darrows ending or self destruct. Also deciding on whether or not I should Kill Darrow lol.

[Morroian]

Sarif, singularity here we come.

[TobiTobsen]

The Jensen/self destruct ending sounded like the most logical canon choice for me, so I picked it but I don't know... they all don't feel "right" to me.

But I'm missing a ending where I can reveal the Illuminati without throwing humanity back into the dark ages and instill fear of technology into the heads of the people.

[Augustei]

I wonder if anyone picked the Illuminati

[Cutlass Jack]

I technically went with David Sarif. Not because I think its a good idea, but just because I like the man and his idealism.

I say technically, since its easy enough to reload and see them all. I'm still trying to figure out how Megan had 'nowhere else to go' if you pick Sarif though. Its not like he'd fire her.

[Augustei]

TobiTobsen wrote...

The Jensen/self destruct ending sounded like the most logical canon choice for me, so I picked it but I don't know... they all don't feel "right" to me.

But I'm missing a ending where I can reveal the Illuminati without throwing humanity back into the dark ages and instill fear of technology into the heads of the people.

Which one is that? The David Sarif one?

[Chromie]

I reloaded and picked all three.

[TobiTobsen]

XxDeonxX wrote...

TobiTobsen wrote...

The Jensen/self destruct ending sounded like the most logical canon choice for me, so I picked it but I don't know... they all don't feel "right" to me.

But I'm missing a ending where I can reveal the Illuminati without throwing humanity back into the dark ages and instill fear of technology into the heads of the people.

Which one is that? The David Sarif one?

Na... the not existing one that I want to have

[Costin_Razvan]

But I'm missing a ending where I can reveal the Illuminati without throwing humanity back into the dark ages and instill fear of technology into the heads of the people.

How does Darrow's choice relate to that? I get what Jensen says but that's not what the choice is about.

The choice only affects augmentation technology.

[Cutlass Jack]

Ringo12 wrote...

I reloaded and picked all three.

You missed the fourth around the corner?

[Raizo]

I did them al for the XBox 360 Achievement ( Deus EX ) but I guess my cannon ending is blowing up the base an everyone on it.

[Merci357]

Of course I've seen all four endings - there's none I'm happy about, but if I had to choose one as my personal canon ending, I'd pick David Sarif.

[TobiTobsen]

Costin_Razvan wrote...

But I'm missing a ending where I can reveal the Illuminati without throwing humanity back into the dark ages and instill fear of technology into the heads of the people.

How does Darrow's choice relate to that? I get what Jensen says but that's not what the choice is about.

The choice only affects augmentation technology.

You're telling the world that there is a organisation that is controlling them since who knows when with technology and their scientific research. They are toying with the world.
That could lead to a little bit of anti technology paranoia. That was at least my impression. *shrug*

[KnightofPhoenix]

XxDeonxX wrote...

I wonder if anyone picked the Illuminati

I did.

[Chromie]

Cutlass Jack wrote...

Ringo12 wrote...

I reloaded and picked all three.

You missed the fourth around the corner?

Nope. Who could miss Bob Page. Does that mean Megan helped created the nanoaugs for the Denton brothers?

[KnightofPhoenix]

Ringo12 wrote...

Cutlass Jack wrote...

Ringo12 wrote...

I reloaded and picked all three.

You missed the fourth around the corner?

Nope. Who could miss Bob Page. Does that mean Megan helped created the nanoaugs for the Denton brothers?

I think he was referring to the self-destruct option, which is the fourth ending.

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 12 septembre 2011 - 02:30 .

[Chromie]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

I think he was referring to the self-destruct option, which is the fourth ending.

Blah yea I got all four. Walk down the short hall. Like I said I reloaded and saw all the endings. Which makes the ending feel cheap : /

Modifié par Ringo12, 12 septembre 2011 - 02:31 .

[Cutlass Jack]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Ringo12 wrote...

Nope. Who could miss Bob Page. Does that mean Megan helped created the nanoaugs for the Denton brothers?

I think he was referring to the self-destruct option, which is the fourth ending.

Yup this. There were four buttons you could press, not three. The Bob Page bit was unchanged for all of them.

edit: I see you got it.

Modifié par Cutlass Jack, 12 septembre 2011 - 02:32 .

[Andarthiel_Demigod]

Sarif all the way, I hated those Purity First bigots and all those anti-aug fanatics.Technology must move forward(and it's the most cyberpunk-ish ending of the four)

[KnightofPhoenix]

Ringo12 wrote...
Like I said I reloaded and saw all the endings. Which makes the ending feel cheap : /

I did the same, but out of curiosity.

I don't think it makes it cheap if one looks at them from a philosophical perspective and not so much a game choice.
I found all of them have merit, and all of them have cons and a certain amount of naivity.
I lean towards one (Illuminati), but I know full well the cons of that choice.

What I love about it is that all these endings would likely lead to a less than optimal outcome.

[Chromie]

I personally preferred the ending that makes helps Sarif. Augmentation should be embraced and they were working on making augs that more people can accept with out failures and not need to take drugs for.

Sarif wasn't finding more ways to get rich and while agree there needs to be some regulation there is no denying how amazing and useful Augs can be in the right hands.

[TobiTobsen]

Is Jensen speech at the end different, if you just kill every enemy you encounter?
I always got the "I tried to preserve my humanity and succeded most of the time" line and guessed that this is his voice over if you go mostly non lethal.

[adneate]

I went with David Sarif since he's essentially the only honest and visionary person in the group. Bill Taggart just wants to control the technology so that he and his illumanit buddies can use it to oppress others and control their lives. Hugh Darrow was just a scared old man who's own creation outgrew him and was probably somewhat bitter because it never improved his life in the way it might have improved others.

[KnightofPhoenix]

Ringo12 wrote...
Sarif wasn't finding more ways to get rich and while agree there needs to be some regulation there is no denying how amazing and useful Augs can be in the right hands.

How do you explain Typhoon and selling it to military contractors?
Sarif is the head of a corporation. Of course he is in it for profit. If only to fund his project. He needs money.

That's my main gripe with Sarif's choice, that I think many people miss. It's giving corporations a lot of leeway to do what they want. I personally am not comfortable with profit first industries determining human evolution. I indeed think that they can end up impeding it. Sometimes, making crap is more profitable than genuine progress.

[Rockworm503]

Ringo12 wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

I think he was referring to the self-destruct option, which is the fourth ending.

Blah yea I got all four. Walk down the short hall. Like I said I reloaded and saw all the endings. Which makes the ending feel cheap : /

Which is exactly why i didn't do that
I sided with humanity front.  the regulation ending seemed most logical for my first playthrough.