Defeating The Reapers: Naval Victory
#1
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:21
Also tidbit
Flagship of the Fifth Fleet in 2185. Constructed sometime after 2183 and
completed by 2185. If Shepard has the Spacer background, Hannah Shepard is the captain of this ship in 2185.
This could also be interesting if bioware runs with it
#2
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:25
The Reapers are too strong to be beaten like that. Otherwise a species like the Protheans whom had a galactic empire could have just thrown their fleets at the Reapers too, and won.
#3
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:27
#4
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:27
#5
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:29
#6
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:31
#7
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:32
111987 wrote...
Nope.
The Reapers are too strong to be beaten like that. Otherwise a species like the Protheans whom had a galactic empire could have just thrown their fleets at the Reapers too, and won.
Looking for a way to beat the Reapers is a main plotpoint in ME3, and I don't see any other way to beat them.
And besides, it could be said that the Protheans never had a chance to organize a counterattack against the Reapers since they most probably deactivated the Mass Relay Network before anyone could act or notice what was going on, effectively cutting off communications galaxy-wide.
edit: It's either that, or a Deus Ex Machina. Which is worse?
Modifié par el master pr, 16 septembre 2011 - 05:33 .
#8
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:37
el master pr wrote...
111987 wrote...
Nope.
The Reapers are too strong to be beaten like that. Otherwise a species like the Protheans whom had a galactic empire could have just thrown their fleets at the Reapers too, and won.
Looking for a way to beat the Reapers is a main plotpoint in ME3, and I don't see any other way to beat them.
And besides, it could be said that the Protheans never had a chance to organize a counterattack against the Reapers since they most probably deactivated the Mass Relay Network before anyone could act or notice what was going on, effectively cutting off communications galaxy-wide.
edit: It's either that, or a Deus Ex Machina. Which is worse?
It doesn't have to be one or the other. I think it's pretty clear though that if we just assembled a massive fleet and threw them at the Reapers, we'd lose.
If a Reaper can one-shot a dreadnaught with its main gun every 5 seconds, and has 10-11 Thanix Cannons that fire every 3 seconds that can one shot anything smaller than a dreadnaught, we would face HUGE losses in just the opening minutes. Meanwhile, their shields 'are invulnerable to dreadnaught fire'; while they can be whittled down, we know it would take hundreds of kilotons of force to bring down the shields of even one Reaper.
Their shields and weapons are just too strong to face in a straight up fight.
#9
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:42
Which is why we're going to have to rescue Miranda from TIM and do a Lazarus on Jeff Goldblum, so he can upload a virus to the Reaper mothership using his Apple Macintosh111987 wrote...
el master pr wrote...
111987 wrote...
Nope.
The Reapers are too strong to be beaten like that. Otherwise a species like the Protheans whom had a galactic empire could have just thrown their fleets at the Reapers too, and won.
Looking for a way to beat the Reapers is a main plotpoint in ME3, and I don't see any other way to beat them.
And besides, it could be said that the Protheans never had a chance to organize a counterattack against the Reapers since they most probably deactivated the Mass Relay Network before anyone could act or notice what was going on, effectively cutting off communications galaxy-wide.
edit: It's either that, or a Deus Ex Machina. Which is worse?
It doesn't have to be one or the other. I think it's pretty clear though that if we just assembled a massive fleet and threw them at the Reapers, we'd lose.
If a Reaper can one-shot a dreadnaught with its main gun every 5 seconds, and has 10-11 Thanix Cannons that fire every 3 seconds that can one shot anything smaller than a dreadnaught, we would face HUGE losses in just the opening minutes. Meanwhile, their shields 'are invulnerable to dreadnaught fire'; while they can be whittled down, we know it would take hundreds of kilotons of force to bring down the shields of even one Reaper.
Their shields and weapons are just too strong to face in a straight up fight.
Modifié par marshalleck, 16 septembre 2011 - 05:42 .
#10
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 05:46
marshalleck wrote...
Which is why we're going to have to rescue Miranda from TIM and do a Lazarus on Jeff Goldblum, so he can upload a virus to the Reaper mothership using his Apple Macintosh111987 wrote...
el master pr wrote...
111987 wrote...
Nope.
The Reapers are too strong to be beaten like that. Otherwise a species like the Protheans whom had a galactic empire could have just thrown their fleets at the Reapers too, and won.
Looking for a way to beat the Reapers is a main plotpoint in ME3, and I don't see any other way to beat them.
And besides, it could be said that the Protheans never had a chance to organize a counterattack against the Reapers since they most probably deactivated the Mass Relay Network before anyone could act or notice what was going on, effectively cutting off communications galaxy-wide.
edit: It's either that, or a Deus Ex Machina. Which is worse?
It doesn't have to be one or the other. I think it's pretty clear though that if we just assembled a massive fleet and threw them at the Reapers, we'd lose.
If a Reaper can one-shot a dreadnaught with its main gun every 5 seconds, and has 10-11 Thanix Cannons that fire every 3 seconds that can one shot anything smaller than a dreadnaught, we would face HUGE losses in just the opening minutes. Meanwhile, their shields 'are invulnerable to dreadnaught fire'; while they can be whittled down, we know it would take hundreds of kilotons of force to bring down the shields of even one Reaper.
Their shields and weapons are just too strong to face in a straight up fight.
haha so true
#11
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 06:04
Not unless we have a truly stupendous number advantage. Something like 15 to 1 might allow for it, but where in the galaxy would you get all the ships?Gabey5 wrote...
Do you think the reapers can be defeated via a naval victory , even though they have a beachhead on Earth?
If it's something like "Oh, we discovered a lost Prothean fleet that had super-advanced technology that allowed us to advance far beyond what we had before. Not to mention bringing the Prothean fleet here.", I'll be pretty disappointed, though.
#12
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 07:08
Shepard is either going to defeat the Reapers on land or in space. And out of the two, on land seems to be the less plausible option. Why would the entire Reaper fleet be on the surface of a single planet?
Personally I'd like to see Shepard destroy the Reapers by somehow luring them into a battle on ground (ok, space) of his own choosing, and somehow triggering a supernova. The Reapers could not survive a supernova. Then again, neither could Shepard. But I'm a fan of tragic heroes.
#13
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 08:09
We have no realistic hope for a decisive conventional victory unless we find some exploitable weakness in the Reapers.
#14
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 09:10
It'll probably be more like this:
'Palaven knows that three Reapers are in the system and are about to attack, fortunately they have a large (larger than the small amount of Turian ships protecting the Citadel at the end of ME 1) fleet plus several powerful orbital laser cannons ready to fight the Reapers off'
So there will probably be lots of small battles like that.
Also you should keep in mind that not all the Reapers are as big as Harbinger and Sovereign...they'll still be hard to fight but with the right battle plan and amount of ships its still possible to beat the Reapers. A lot of battles in history have been very one sided against near impossible odds, I'm sure it is somewhat similar in space combat
#15
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 09:12
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
#16
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 09:26
#17
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 09:30
I think the numbers will be different this timeSomeone With Mass wrote...
Considering that both the Alliance and turian fleets were almost completely wiped out? Not really.
Modifié par Sleepicub09, 16 septembre 2011 - 09:32 .
#18
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 10:47
#19
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:02
S'F'
#20
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:09
SandTrout wrote...
The only hope for a naval victory is a long campaign of brutal hit-and-run tactics aimed at reducing the number of Reapers over a matter of years.
We have no realistic hope for a decisive conventional victory unless we find some exploitable weakness in the Reapers.
Yep!
#21
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:53
#22
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:56
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
#23
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:58
#24
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 11:59
#25
Posté 16 septembre 2011 - 12:22
Soul Cool wrote...
Not unless we have a truly stupendous number advantage. Something like 15 to 1 might allow for it, but where in the galaxy would you get all the ships?Gabey5 wrote...
Do you think the reapers can be defeated via a naval victory , even though they have a beachhead on Earth?
Not even close.
In an opening salvo, a single reaper take take out 6-7 ships. That's half of your forces gone...just like that.
You'd need at least 50:1. And hope they don't retreat as soon as their shields get low.





Retour en haut







