Xilizhra wrote...
If you decide to define a character's sexuality as ambiguous unless he or she has expressed an interest in the same sex, you've just taken heterosexual characters out of the game. Now every character is either gay, bi, or an unknown who is possibily gay or bi but in the closet.
There are no know gay characters in the game at all...
There are going to be new characters in ME3, like Vega. These 'blank slate' characters would be Bioware's best bet for clearly defined gay characters.
While not gay, Jack however is bisexual. She could return as a bi romance option even though she wasn't one in ME2.
Xilizhra wrote...
So for simplicity's sake I think a character's sexuality should be defined by their expressed interests over the last two games. Characters that have previously only expressed an interest in Sheps of the opposite sex, and who have only mentioned previous heterosexual romances, should return in ME3 as heterosexual.
Why do you need to have explicit heterosexuals exist so much?
Why do you need to have explicit gay characters to exist so much?
It would be only fair after all if there is going to be characters that gay players can identify with, that there be characters that heterosexual players can identify with as well.
Being amibguous about sexuality does not mean that heterosexuals are now gone or that everyone is gay or bi, but you're right about the "unknown" part. However, I fail to see why that is bad. Do you know the sexuality of everyone around you at all times?
The argument for gay characters in the game is so that gay players have some characters in the story that they can identify with. Likewise it would be hardly fair to heterosexual players to remove clearly defined heterosexual characters from the game. Heterosexual people exist in the real world, and they should exist in Mass Effect.
Modifié par Han Shot First, 19 septembre 2011 - 06:16 .