Aller au contenu

Photo

I don't give a F**k about S/S romances. (Rant Thread)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
301 réponses à ce sujet

#76
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages
I feel the need to post in this thread before its inevitable lock.

#77
Guest_Jek Romano Shavo_*

Guest_Jek Romano Shavo_*
  • Guests

AdmiralCheez wrote...

I feel the need to post in this thread before its inevitable lock.


Ditto.

#78
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests

ladyvader wrote...

Blze001 wrote...

happy_daiz wrote...

I think the moderators are sleeping...


Image IPB

EDIT: Haha, I posted the rainbow one in a S/S thread. That was completely coincidental, I assure you Image IPB

I think Dr. Sigmund Freud would disagree with that.   ;)


Ah, Freud was a crock in ways. He was projecting most of the time.

#79
Eccentrica Gallumbits

Eccentrica Gallumbits
  • Members
  • 172 messages

IsaacShep wrote...

Tup3xi wrote...

 I'm rather conservative, straight man and to be honest I've never understand S/S relationships and never will.

Actually, you do in a way. If a hot guy walks in a room, you will be like "whatever, who cares?" = you fully understand lesbians :P


Image IPB lmao 

#80
ladyvader

ladyvader
  • Members
  • 3 524 messages

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

Ah, Freud was a crock in ways. He was projecting most of the time.

Very true.  He was out there.  That much is clear.

#81
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

IsaacShep wrote...

Tup3xi wrote...

 I'm rather conservative, straight man and to be honest I've never understand S/S relationships and never will.

Actually, you do in a way. If a hot guy walks in a room, you will be like "whatever, who cares?" = you fully understand lesbians :P

Best comment I've read in a while.

#82
Heather Cline

Heather Cline
  • Members
  • 2 822 messages

Alexnssilent wrote...

Heather Cline wrote...

I laugh at the OP. People are going to make threads on forums like "i want more s/s romances" and people like you posting "stop the s/s romances" or "i have homosexual friends so i'm not homophobic" classic stuff. Nothing you say or do will stop them, so i say sit back, ignore those threads and get a good laugh at the people posting that stuff. Because life is too short to get upset over stuff on the internet.


but why not fight? put him on a headlock and make him go sleep? why not?! :( doesnt this enrage you?! HIT HIM!!


Not really no. Thing is I've learned getting upset about stuff on the net makes me look foolish, stupid, idiotic. Take your pick. The fact is the net is just something you can come onto, have fun and then leave. I'd rather get upset about something happening offline. Like say losing my net connection, or having a family member yell at me. Those are things that are worth getting upset over. Words on the net... not worth it at all.

#83
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Another extraneous S/S thread going down in flames.
Image IPB
For the record, starting a sentence with "I'm not homophobic but..." almost never works.

#84
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*

Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
  • Guests

leggywillow wrote...

It just boggles my mind that people think it's okay to make a mean homophobic statement as long as they preface it with "I have a gay friend" or "I'm totes not a homophobe but-".  That's just not how it works.

Having a token gay, black, or female friend that you claim to respect does not mean you have somehow entered an exclusive club that gives you permission to make sexist, racist, or otherwise cruel statements.  At least not without getting called out on it.


As for the first part of your post: Ok, what should be said then, hm? The littlest thing one says wrong and one gets immediately shot at all sides by people jelling 'OMFG HE/SHE HATES GAYS BURN HIM HE/SHE IS A HOMOPHOBE'. Give me a break, it's never good, even if one tries to be polite. Oh well, 't is the internet, anything is allowed, I presume.

I however agree with the second part of your post. Of course people shouldn't be using such statements just to say something offensive. It's just this 'don't-you-dare-stepping-into-the-hornet's-nest' attitude that bothers me. People flaming and calling bad names just to vent their opinions and convictions...

Modifié par Ivandra Ceruden, 19 septembre 2011 - 06:45 .


#85
k177sh0t

k177sh0t
  • Members
  • 687 messages
I like this thread and agree with it

Modifié par k177sh0t, 19 septembre 2011 - 06:41 .


#86
Tup3x

Tup3x
  • Members
  • 3 526 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Tup3xi wrote...

 I'm rather conservative, straight man and to be honest I've never understand S/S relationships and never will.

Actually, you do in a way. If a hot guy walks in a room, you will be like "whatever, who cares?" = you fully understand lesbians :P

Best comment I've read in a while.

That... Is pretty interesting point of view. :P

#87
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*

Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
  • Guests

Collider wrote...

Another extraneous S/S thread going down in flames.
Image IPB
For the record, starting a sentence with "I'm not homophobic but..." almost never works.


^This

#88
C9316

C9316
  • Members
  • 5 638 messages
Image IPB

#89
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 044 messages

Ivandra Ceruden wrote...

Collider wrote...

Another extraneous S/S thread going down in flames.
For the record, starting a sentence with "I'm not homophobic but..." almost never works.


^This

Bioware really needs to implement a system, which in the same manner as changig profanity to series of asterisks, changes the phrase "I'm not homophobic but..." to "flag me for spam".

#90
DRUNK_CANADIAN

DRUNK_CANADIAN
  • Members
  • 2 275 messages
They should lock all S/S threads, if they only cater to select ones, its kinda biased.

#91
Guest_Jek Romano Shavo_*

Guest_Jek Romano Shavo_*
  • Guests
Image IPB

#92
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*

Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
  • Guests
@DRUNK_CANADIAN: Well, the problem with such topics is that they usually only lead to 'haters gonna hate' situations, no?

Modifié par Ivandra Ceruden, 19 septembre 2011 - 06:55 .


#93
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 354 messages
They allow the ones that are productive and not full of non-relative issues.

Modifié par spiros9110, 19 septembre 2011 - 07:01 .


#94
ladyvader

ladyvader
  • Members
  • 3 524 messages

Collider wrote...*snip*

For the record, starting a sentence with "I'm not homophobic but..." almost never works.

It makes about as much sense as saying I have black friends then go off about black people.  It doesn't work there either.

#95
Cailean

Cailean
  • Members
  • 224 messages

Cheesy Blue wrote...

... one of my best friends is gay so ha I get immunity!


That makes about as much sense as this:



#96
mineralica

mineralica
  • Members
  • 3 310 messages
So this thread (OP of current thread was complained about) got locked and the current thread survived? Was that supposed to be an irony or what?

#97
BubbleSauce

BubbleSauce
  • Members
  • 660 messages

Tup3xi wrote...

S/S stuff seems to be way too important for some (are they trying to prove something?) and it annoys some people greatly. If OP meant that, I understand that. I personally just try to ignore it all. I'm rather conservative, straight man and to be honest I've never understand S/S relationships and never will.

Though, reading the title and first post kinda gives mixed feelings about OP. Is he actually ranting about everything?


No one does, and as a bisexual man, neither do I, I just like men, I didn't ask for it, I just do, what do people want from me?

#98
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests

ladyvader wrote...

Collider wrote...*snip*

For the record, starting a sentence with "I'm not homophobic but..." almost never works.

It makes about as much sense as saying I have black friends then go off about black people.  It doesn't work there either.


Well, it depends on what one is saying. If one were to say, "I have black friends, so I'm not racist, but racism has turned around so that blacks and women are automatically given a position before a white male." Then that would work fine, as they're not attacking black people. The problem is, as I said in the other thread, is that people are saying that complaining about ingame implementation=homophobia, and that just isn't so. While the OP may have said some confrontational things, he also said the same about the people arguing against s/s.

#99
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 044 messages

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

ladyvader wrote...

Collider wrote...*snip*
For the record, starting a sentence with "I'm not homophobic but..." almost never works.

It makes about as much sense as saying I have black friends then go off about black people.  It doesn't work there either.

Well, it depends on what one is saying. If one were to say, "I have black friends, so I'm not racist, but racism has turned around so that blacks and women are automatically given a position before a white male." Then that would work fine, as they're not attacking black people. The problem is, as I said in the other thread, is that people are saying that complaining about ingame implementation=homophobia, and that just isn't so. While the OP may have said some confrontational things, he also said the same about the people arguing against s/s.

Perhaps, but that's not how these threads usually turn out.

#100
DRUNK_CANADIAN

DRUNK_CANADIAN
  • Members
  • 2 275 messages

Ivandra Ceruden wrote...

@DRUNK_CANADIAN: Well, the problem with such topics is that they usually only lead to 'haters gonna hate' situations, no?


EEEEEE yup.

Lock em all, showing bias to one is complete BS.