411 réponses à ce sujet

[hawat333]

Nope.

[Random citizen]

HolyAvenger wrote...

Having recently played the confrontation in 1, I'm don't think Liara is down with the poly-relationship idea (plus the way the sleazy-Renegade-Shep says, it sounds like he/she is talking about just sex), its just Kaidan/Ash are more disgusted and react more quickly.

Liara says she understands the concept of human jealousy(which of course is the result of a cocktail of both biology and cultural reasons) . Ash and Kaidan are both pretty conservative/old fashioned and jealous characters so they are more or less outraged by the thought (and yes Shepard comes across as a bit sleazy in his/her delivery of the proposal) so they prefer missing out. Liara has no problem staying with Shepard though, even though she knows that he/she also are interested in others. Too bad my Ash died on Vermire, sometimes when we loose an opportunity, we loose what it can bring forever. So its important that choices are made for the right reasons.

Which leads me to my second point. Given that the LIs are within a close group of extraordinary individuals thay are all already in a close relationship with oneanother. Do the math.

Modifié par Random citizen, 28 décembre 2011 - 04:09 .

[45hitman]

yes

[HolyAvenger]

Random citizen wrote...
 Liara has no problem staying with Shepard though, even though she knows that he/she also are interested in others. 

Liara stays because she doesn't have any competition for Shep anymore. All she thinks is Shep is up for a threesome not polyamory.

Random citizen wrote...

Which leads me to my second point. Given that the LIs are within a close group of extraordinary individuals thay are all already in a close relationship with oneanother. Do the math.

LAWL. Close group of individuals does not equate to polyamorous relationship. Platonic, fire-forged-friends closeness is its own trope. 

[Random citizen]

HolyAvenger wrote...

Random citizen wrote...
 Liara has no problem staying with Shepard though, even though she knows that he/she also are interested in others. 

Liara stays because she doesn't have any competition for Shep anymore. All she thinks is Shep is up for a threesome not polyamory.

Random citizen wrote...

Which leads me to my second point. Given that the LIs are within a close group of extraordinary individuals thay are all already in a close relationship with oneanother. Do the math.

LAWL. Close group of individuals does not equate to polyamorous relationship. Platonic, fire-forged-friends closeness is its own trope. 

1)
Ash or Kaidan are the ones saying that Shepard must make a choice. Dialouge options allows Shepard to express his or her feelings for both Liara or Ash/Kaidan.  While some people might not be that concered over what their parter feels for others as long as they are do not act upon it, I guess most people would like that their partners are monogamous because they are not interested in anyone else.

2)
Nor did I state so. I merely wished you describe the context if the romantic interests was present. In a working polyamorous setting, you do not automatically need to dump someone you love to be with someone else you love or are interested in. Such suffering becomes unnecessary.

[Random citizen]

Resist Reaper indoctrination!
Support polyamorous relationships in ME3
-even though it most certainly is too late.

[Random citizen]

Have I convinced you HolyAvenger?

[HolyAvenger]

Nope, sorry thread sank/I forgot about it.

1) Just because Ash/Kaidan reacts first to break up with Shep doesn't mean Liara automatically wants to be in a poly relationship. That's a logical fallacy. My entire point was that there is literally no evidence to support Liara being comfortable with any such arrangement.

2) OK, we're meandering well away from the topic. I don't want to comment on the nature of poly relationships, just the fact that within your party, all members have an extraordinarily close bond. But that doesn't translate to them being open to poly relationships.

Sorry, I see no realistic way to do this at all within the game.

[Random citizen]

HolyAvenger wrote...

Nope, sorry thread sank/I forgot about it.

1) Just because Ash/Kaidan reacts first to break up with Shep doesn't mean Liara automatically wants to be in a poly relationship. That's a logical fallacy. My entire point was that there is literally no evidence to support Liara being comfortable with any such arrangement.

2) OK, we're meandering well away from the topic. I don't want to comment on the nature of poly relationships, just the fact that within your party, all members have an extraordinarily close bond. But that doesn't translate to them being open to poly relationships.

Sorry, I see no realistic way to do this at all within the game.

1. If one is not jealous and understanding, there is no reason to be against ones partners seeing others. That is why there is no need for any direct evidence.

2. It does not, but it does not make them more closed to it either.

Modifié par Random citizen, 03 janvier 2012 - 05:28 .

[HolyAvenger]

Eh? No need for direct evidence? Total BS mate, you can just make up stuff if there's "no need" for direct evidence. I'm sorry, I'm not debating someone who doesn't require evidence.

[Random citizen]

Perhaps you did not actually understood what I wrote. There is no "direct" evidence for or against it since the subject has not directly been addressed by Liara or anyone else. There are only indicia that does not not reveal anything conclusive. But if you read this thread you will see that a lot of people agree with that Liara might not be that much of a possessive parter.

[Rex Fallout]

No. Game should have story and not revolve around sex.

[Random citizen]

Rex Fallout wrote...

No. Game should have story and not revolve around sex.

Good that this thread is not named "would you support people just sleeping around in ME3?" then.

[JBo796]

Ravensword wrote...

Polyamory means having more than one LI at a time w/ the full knowledge of everyone involved in the relationship?

What about just raping everyone?  That's coolz right....?

[Random citizen]

JBo796 wrote...

Ravensword wrote...

Polyamory means having more than one LI at a time w/ the full knowledge of everyone involved in the relationship?

What about just raping everyone?  That's coolz right....?

I am reminded on Mordin and his comment on human diversity.

[Rex Fallout]

Random citizen wrote...

Rex Fallout wrote...

No. Game should have story and not revolve around sex.

Good that this thread is not named "would you support people just sleeping around in ME3?" then.

But that is what it is about.  They just want the ability to have a crazy alien threesome.  

Luckily there is no way in hell Bioware would allow for this to happen so I'm not concerned.  

[Random citizen]

Rex Fallout wrote...

Random citizen wrote...

Rex Fallout wrote...

No. Game should have story and not revolve around sex.

Good that this thread is not named "would you support people just sleeping around in ME3?" then.

But that is what it is about.  They just want the ability to have a crazy alien threesome.  

Luckily there is no way in hell Bioware would allow for this to happen so I'm not concerned.  

You clearly have not read much in this thread .

[Random citizen]

<3

[Unpleasant Implications]

You seem adamant about this. Are you attempting to make some sort of point about the difference between polyamory and "LAWL, 3SOME WIN!!!" attitudes?

[Random citizen]

Unpleasant Implications wrote...

You seem adamant about this. Are you attempting to make some sort of point about the difference between polyamory and "LAWL, 3SOME WIN!!!" attitudes?

Of course.

[LaurenShepard-N7]

Juggling multiple LIs and having it blow up in a fight between your squad mates could be fun, but having an entire alien harem for a squad would be kind of ridiculous and best left for crazy anime dating sims...

[Nynaeve]

yes

[Xilizhra]

Random citizen wrote...

Unpleasant Implications wrote...

You seem adamant about this. Are you attempting to make some sort of point about the difference between polyamory and "LAWL, 3SOME WIN!!!" attitudes?

Of course.

Well, I do hope it works out.

[DRUNK_CANADIAN]

Why hasn't this been implemented.

[Random citizen]

Xilizhra wrote...

Random citizen wrote...

Unpleasant Implications wrote...

You seem adamant about this. Are you attempting to make some sort of point about the difference between polyamory and "LAWL, 3SOME WIN!!!" attitudes?

Of course.

Well, I do hope it works out.