991 réponses à ce sujet

[mineralica]

I'll believe there will be multiplayer in two (technically, three) cases:

- when I'll see a video where Mr. Hudson explicitly confirms there will be multiplayer

- thread about confirmation of multiplayer appearing in "Mass Effect 3 news and announcements"

- * I'd launch a game and see this option. Hardly unlikely.


All other claims will be dismissed

[TheGreenAlloy]

IronSabbath88 wrote...

Think about this for a second. If it's seperate co-op missions NOT RELATED TO THE STORY, as has been suggested, would they not maybe take a Red Dead Redemption route then and maybe have the co-op missions as free downloads? As in, they won't even BE on the disc? Then the game discs are fully singleplayer and the co-op add ons are downloadable. That's the prime way to go about it and it's totally what I see happening.

That would be satisfactory, as long as the missions were tactical and varied. In addition, some sort of Firefight/Horde mode would be a nice addition as long as it is incorperated properly.

[CptBomBom00]

Alright as a fan i agree with Dlc multiplayer thing.

[TheGreenAlloy]

littlezack wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Bachi1230 wrote...

Tad inappropriate don't you think Mr.Kusy?

Also to OP They have neither confirmed or denied multiplayer, but the impression we're getting is that it isn't likely to have Multiplayer in ME 3.

On a side note I'm not sure how having a Co-op mode multiplayer where you can have one person be shepard and the other be one of the crew members (They get unique dialogue options appropriate to their character that are just flavor text). be a bad thing.

Also I've yet to see a game be "ruined" with the edition of multiplayer. Not that I support multiplayer for ME 3.

Indeed. Something co-operative would be interesting.

It would be an interesting way of solving the AI problem - remove it from the equation.

Hah.

[colossus50000]

NO

[Homey C-Dawg]

The rumor has been around for so long that I don't have particularly strong feelings on the matter anymore, but I will say that if there is multiplayer, I hope it's in DLC form and not integrated into the main game.

[zico291]

Read this: http://www.eurogamer...-no-multiplayer

[Biotic Sage]

zico291 wrote...

Read this: http://www.eurogamer...-no-multiplayer

There are no direct quotes in that article.  When referring people to sources, it's better to refer them to primary sources (i.e. developers saying directly "there is no multiplayer in ME3") than secondary sources (i.e. journalists quoting each other in a mutual-masturbatory journalism frenzy).

I doubt there will be multiplayer in ME3 because I have seen the direct quotes from Bioware that indicate there won't be, but the game still isn't out yet.  They could always just be denying it.

Modifié par Biotic Sage, 03 octobre 2011 - 09:04 .

[zico291]

Biotic Sage wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Read this: http://www.eurogamer...-no-multiplayer

There are no direct quotes in that article.  When referring people to sources, it's better to refer them to primary sources (i.e. developers saying directly "there is no multiplayer in ME3") than secondary sources (i.e. journalists quoting each other in a mutual-masturbatory journalism frenzy).

I doubt there will be multiplayer in ME3 because I have seen the direct quotes from Bioware that indicate there won't be, but the game still isn't out yet.  They could always just be denying it.

Agreed, well every bit of infomation counts to something right. I really hope there is no multiplayer.

[Biotic Sage]

zico291 wrote...

Biotic Sage wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Read this: http://www.eurogamer...-no-multiplayer

There are no direct quotes in that article.  When referring people to sources, it's better to refer them to primary sources (i.e. developers saying directly "there is no multiplayer in ME3") than secondary sources (i.e. journalists quoting each other in a mutual-masturbatory journalism frenzy).

I doubt there will be multiplayer in ME3 because I have seen the direct quotes from Bioware that indicate there won't be, but the game still isn't out yet.  They could always just be denying it.

Agreed, well every bit of infomation counts to something right. I really hope there is no multiplayer.

It would definitely be a strange move to make at this point in general.  What would bother me the most about it though would be how they have denied, denied, denied this feature up until now; I think it would be disrespectful for them to suddenly say "Scratch all that!  We were lying the whole time!"  Not to mention the fact that this move would seriously undermine Bioware's credibility (at least for me).

[Ramus Quaritch]

mineralica wrote...

I'll believe there will be multiplayer in two (technically, three) cases:

- when I'll see a video where Mr. Hudson explicitly confirms there will be multiplayer

- thread about confirmation of multiplayer appearing in "Mass Effect 3 news and announcements"

- * I'd launch a game and see this option. Hardly unlikely.


All other claims will be dismissed

The Turian councilor would still dismiss multiplayer, even with all three of those conditions met. 

[zico291]

Biotic Sage wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Biotic Sage wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Read this: http://www.eurogamer...-no-multiplayer

There are no direct quotes in that article.  When referring people to sources, it's better to refer them to primary sources (i.e. developers saying directly "there is no multiplayer in ME3") than secondary sources (i.e. journalists quoting each other in a mutual-masturbatory journalism frenzy).

I doubt there will be multiplayer in ME3 because I have seen the direct quotes from Bioware that indicate there won't be, but the game still isn't out yet.  They could always just be denying it.

Agreed, well every bit of infomation counts to something right. I really hope there is no multiplayer.

It would definitely be a strange move to make at this point in general.  What would bother me the most about it though would be how they have denied, denied, denied this feature up until now; I think it would be disrespectful for them to suddenly say "Scratch all that!  We were lying the whole time!"  Not to mention the fact that this move would seriously undermine Bioware's credibility (at least for me).

I have trusted Bioware alot with their games, to be honest if they pulled a move like this it make me feel a little distrusted, towards games that Bioware develop. This is eating away at me. Can't wait for the 25th October. To find out. Or not find out...

[shepskisaac]

xnoxiousx wrote...


Its bad news i am almost sure now single player part of the game will suffer from that. No matter how much you argue it if they do co-op that is 2 or 3 months they could have made more missions or fixes or better things to single player.

Excepp co-op (if real) was most likely done by BioWare Montreal so it wouldn't take away from SP.

[Illusive]

Biotic Sage wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Biotic Sage wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Read this: http://www.eurogamer...-no-multiplayer

There are no direct quotes in that article.  When referring people to sources, it's better to refer them to primary sources (i.e. developers saying directly "there is no multiplayer in ME3") than secondary sources (i.e. journalists quoting each other in a mutual-masturbatory journalism frenzy).

I doubt there will be multiplayer in ME3 because I have seen the direct quotes from Bioware that indicate there won't be, but the game still isn't out yet.  They could always just be denying it.

Agreed, well every bit of infomation counts to something right. I really hope there is no multiplayer.

It would definitely be a strange move to make at this point in general.  What would bother me the most about it though would be how they have denied, denied, denied this feature up until now; I think it would be disrespectful for them to suddenly say "Scratch all that!  We were lying the whole time!"  Not to mention the fact that this move would seriously undermine Bioware's credibility (at least for me).

I just don't understand why they would keep denying it if there really was multiplayer. One would think that they would instead talk about it every chance they get, to help promote the game to a larger potential customer base.

[Foryou]

how about we wait for bioware to respond

[Wannabe_Overlord]

If Bioware is smart there will be no multiplayer but instead an enhanced singleplayer to make up for Mass Effect 2 making many decisions from Mass Effect 1 amount to nothing.

[zico291]

Foryou wrote...

how about we wait for bioware to respond

I somehow don't think they will...

[FoxShadowblade]

And here I was looking forward to swatting a few uppity Xbox Live kids around with Biotics.

..Damn.

[Hekate]

I dunno, if this confirms anything but.

http://xbox360.ign.c.../1197662p1.html

[zico291]

Amieera wrote...

I dunno, if this confirms anything but.

http://xbox360.ign.c.../1197662p1.html

Something like cerberus network...please....

[Gokuthegrate]

Personally i would be fine if they included multiplay in ME3 aslong as a seperate team was developing it. As long as the single player game isnt damaged by diverting resouces to the multiplayer aspect I can see no harm.

[Siansonea]

Radical new idea: How about we complain about the new feature AFTER we know what it is? Or better yet, AFTER we've directly experienced its implementation in the game? Instead of, you know, assuming it's multiplayer, and assuming it's sucky player-vs.-player and assuming its going to "take away" from the main game. I guess what I'm saying is how about doing less assuming?

After all, once we do know what it is, we'll have plenty of time to complain about it. Look how much mileage DA2 haters have gotten out of "recycled environments".

Modifié par Siansonea II, 03 octobre 2011 - 09:41 .

[Bring_the_rain]

Edit: Post removed.

Modifié par Chris Priestly, 03 octobre 2011 - 10:40 .

[CaimDark]

Siansonea II wrote...

Radical new idea: How about we complain about the new feature AFTER we know what it is? Or better yet, AFTER we've directly experienced its implementation in the game? Instead of, you know, assuming it's multiplayer, and assuming it's sucky player-vs.-player and assuming its going to "take away" from the main game. I guess what I'm saying is how about doing less assuming?

After all, once we do know what it is, we'll have plenty of time to complain about it. Look how much mileage DA2 haters have gotten out of "recycled environments".

I have an even better idea: since we won't know for a while and for now all we can do is assume and hope and agonize and pray and expect and cheer, how about you let us have our fun assuming in peace?