Aller au contenu

Photo

Would you buy Mass Effect '4'


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
68 réponses à ce sujet

#51
CroGamer002

CroGamer002
  • Members
  • 20 672 messages

koopaonfire wrote...

Mesina2 wrote...

Funny fact.

Revan
was male by canon long before TOR was even known in public.

Has
nothing to do with gender, actually. As an avid KotOR-KotOR II fan,
I knew this long ago. I'm referring to Revan's motives, the fact that
Revan is even in TOR and that you can kill him, and so on.



Oh.


Then, it's different Bioware team.
And Lucas.

Modifié par Mesina2, 21 septembre 2011 - 09:43 .


#52
pfhorlorn

pfhorlorn
  • Members
  • 332 messages

Mesina2 wrote...

Oh.

Then, it's different Bioware team. And Lucas.

Fair enough.

I'm still weary, though. If BioWare starts making fantastic games again (like the original ME, KotOR, NWN, DA:O, etc.), then I'll probably buy them. I'm too big of a fangirl to just give up. BioWare's like a drug, mang.

#53
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
I love ME2 just as much as I do the first game. I'm stoked.

#54
Shifty Assassin

Shifty Assassin
  • Members
  • 454 messages
Id buy any game they slap the ME logo on

#55
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages
No, I won't. The team better show they can do more than just Mass Effect after this one.

#56
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

No, I won't. The team better show they can do more than just Mass Effect after this one.


Nah. I'm too big a space opera enthusiast. I'd rather they stuck with Mass Effect unless they were seriously going to go back to the drawing board and start a wholly separate space opera from scratch. Which I can just imagine EA's reaction to, really.

Elves and dwarves have never done too much for me. That's not to say I don't enjoy LotR, Dragon Age and a few other renditions but I'm just not the biggest fantasy buff, even when it's well-written. Not compared to a space setting.

So I don't doubt the team can do more than 'just Mass Effect' but I'm not totally sure I want it.

#57
Amaterasuomikami

Amaterasuomikami
  • Members
  • 142 messages
If ME3 finished on a note that would leave open the possibility of another one, yes. But it seems like ME3 is going to be the last in a trilogy and another game would be tagged on just to make money. Hopefully ME3 will be the end but a very good end.

#58
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages
I wouldn't mind seeing the world itself fleshed out a little more. At the risk of making the ME trilogy less of a story about Shepard and more about one of the major hero's of the universe.

#59
Robbiesan

Robbiesan
  • Members
  • 2 543 messages

nelly21 wrote...

Dude. The way I feel about this series, I'm probably going to be buying ME 30.



damned near verbatim....

love the ME Universe.  damn, I'll be 85yrs and playing ME30 in the geriatrics ward.

#60
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests

JeffZero wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

No, I won't. The team better show they can do more than just Mass Effect after this one.


Nah. I'm too big a space opera enthusiast. I'd rather they stuck with Mass Effect unless they were seriously going to go back to the drawing board and start a wholly separate space opera from scratch. Which I can just imagine EA's reaction to, really.

Elves and dwarves have never done too much for me. That's not to say I don't enjoy LotR, Dragon Age and a few other renditions but I'm just not the biggest fantasy buff, even when it's well-written. Not compared to a space setting.

So I don't doubt the team can do more than 'just Mass Effect' but I'm not totally sure I want it.


I feel the same, I REALLY don't like fantasy, I like stuff based on reality. Of course, we can all debate how realistic Mass Effect is, but it's certainly more "realistic" than fantasy games. I don't want another fantasy RPG from BW. However, if they made a present-day RPG like Alpha Protocol, I'd pick that up so fast.

But no more fantasy, is what I'm saying.

#61
Decnet

Decnet
  • Members
  • 1 messages
I just thought about this today when doing my alternative runthrough for the 10:th time of the series from first to second game with alternative setups to beprepared for the 3:rd one... jadda.. anyways..

I would definetly buy the 4:th outcome AND im also hoping that someday that this game could turn into an mmorpg..

If you look at the characters and so on they all have their specifics that could be used and turned into an AWESOME combination of groups..

Krogan is the obvious tank, Human the obvious allround, Quarians the "tekkies".. and so forth.. Just think of a universe and a bunch of homeworlds and the constant threat from reapers and heretic geths and outback packs.. or why not just fight eachother and alliansec for cash and fame? (And awesome gear.. )

After been talking with people about the subject on online-games, they responded equaly and would definetly see upcoming games with masseffect-spirit as a pure salvation for them.. including myself.

So to answer "shortly": Yes.. i would buy the 4:th edition without question..

#62
pfhorlorn

pfhorlorn
  • Members
  • 332 messages

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

I feel the same, I REALLY don't like fantasy, I like stuff based on reality. Of course, we can all debate how realistic Mass Effect is, but it's certainly more "realistic" than fantasy games. I don't want another fantasy RPG from BW. However, if they made a present-day RPG like Alpha Protocol, I'd pick that up so fast.

But no more fantasy, is what I'm saying.

I want more fantasy RPGs. It would be unfortunate if they stopped making those. You don't have to play them; I'm sure there'll be more scifi down the road.

Mass Effect isn't more "realistic," though. Biotics are comparable to magic, and a lot of the very humanesque alien races are comparable to very humanesque fantasy ones. Soft science fiction and traditional fantasy are pretty much the same degree away from reality, tbh.

And most of that fantasy you dislike is actually based on reality. Y'know, the Middle Ages happened.

Modifié par koopaonfire, 21 septembre 2011 - 10:25 .


#63
SniperNoSniping

SniperNoSniping
  • Members
  • 36 messages
Shoot, I'll buy Mass Effect 90.

#64
DarkDragon777

DarkDragon777
  • Members
  • 1 956 messages
No. Mass Effect should end with the trilogy.

#65
Selene Moonsong

Selene Moonsong
  • Members
  • 3 392 messages
From everything I have seen so far, the best indication is that ME 3 is the end of Shep's story.

Hopefully, it's not the end of the ME universe and is transformed into a new beginning and re-building from the ashes of destruction. Plenty of room there for building another epic space-opera.

#66
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages

Selene Moonsong wrote...

From everything I have seen so far, the best indication is that ME 3 is the end of Shep's story.

Hopefully, it's not the end of the ME universe and is transformed into a new beginning and re-building from the ashes of destruction. Plenty of room there for building another epic space-opera.


Yes. This. A thousand times this. Precisely what it looks like and precisely what I'm hoping for.

#67
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests

koopaonfire wrote...

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

I feel the same, I REALLY don't like fantasy, I like stuff based on reality. Of course, we can all debate how realistic Mass Effect is, but it's certainly more "realistic" than fantasy games. I don't want another fantasy RPG from BW. However, if they made a present-day RPG like Alpha Protocol, I'd pick that up so fast.

But no more fantasy, is what I'm saying.

I want more fantasy RPGs. It would be unfortunate if they stopped making those. You don't have to play them; I'm sure there'll be more scifi down the road.

Mass Effect isn't more "realistic," though. Biotics are comparable to magic, and a lot of the very humanesque alien races are comparable to very humanesque fantasy ones. Soft science fiction and traditional fantasy are pretty much the same degree away from reality, tbh.

And most of that fantasy you dislike is actually based on reality. Y'know, the Middle Ages happened.


Almost every single RPG out there is fantasy. I wounldn't be surprised it literally 95% of all RPGs (and if we're talking about tabletop as such, probably more like 99.999%) are fantasy. Why should they NOT move in a new direction, or continue in the direction they've been in, AKA KotoR and ME? Is is just me or is there a vastly disproportionate amount of fantasy RPGs for Sci fi, is all I'm saying there.

Biotics actually have an in-game explanation: eezo. This is related to mass effect fields and such. Now I know that that isn't real, but it's MORE real than just having something that's obviously false like magic. And on aliens, I don't really like that there are so many; I do think that making more and more (these Raloi or whatever they are, that four-legged or four-armed thing in the latest ME comic) make the game less realistic and more fantastic (I sure you know what that means). Keeping it to about six total species would have been best, as opposed to the ten or more they have now.

I guess you could say I have fantasy "fatigue," kind of like how the shooters all shifted away from WW2 a few years back. RPG is practically synonymous with "fantasy," and I feel that does injustice to the genre, that developers have only been able to do them in a fantasy setting.

#68
SynheKatze

SynheKatze
  • Members
  • 600 messages
As long as it's a good game, why the **** not?

#69
Chris Priestly

Chris Priestly
  • Members
  • 7 259 messages
Sorry, this forum is for Mass Effect 3 discussion, not a hypothetical ME4.


LOCKDOWN!



:devil: