Aller au contenu

Photo

Did anyone else want to kill Sister Nightingale?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
585 réponses à ce sujet

#276
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages

Wulfram wrote...

It is not a fact that the Divine is considering an Exalted March.  All we know is that she was highly concerned by the situation in Kirkwall 
In fact, not even Elthina actually suggests this as a prospect, she only uses it as an illustration that the concern of the Divine is dangerous to attract.


The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Regarding the bolded, it makes me wonder if Leliana asked Hawke to get Elthina to leave so that maybe Meredith would call for an Annulment on the mages who are the problem in her eyes.


David Gaider wrote

So long as the Grand Cleric was alive and refused Meredith's request for
the Right of Annulment, Meredith's only option was to appeal to the
Divine. Once the Grand Cleric was dead, and no immediate successor in
evidence, Meredith had the legal authority she needed.





They ignored you the first time, they'll ignore you this time.

Just like they ignore the fact that Anders, an apostate abomination with a mission, arrives in Kirkwall somewhat more recently than Meredith when looking for the recent source of problems.

Just like they ignore the fact that Leliana, an accomplished spy, considers the mages the source of the problem, not Meredith.

Just like they ignore the crapton of batsh*t crazy mages running around Kirkwall when looking for danger.

Just like they imagine that Thrask, who acted to prevent Templars breaking the law and killing mages they were supposed to take to the Circle, will himself violate the law and cover for a man who killed the Knight Captain arresting an apostate and taking her to the Circle.

Just like they will assume Thrask was right about everything when he decides to join a mage-templar conspiracy to overthrow Meredith, even though he was clearly wrong about the motives of Grace, one of the main conspirators he was involved with (and someone he should have KNOWN was a blood mage, given he was there when she was captured).

Just like they, as someone else said, view mages as the second coming of Andraste, who can do no wrong.

At this point, there is only one thing to say:

IMO, every mage in Thedas should be killed at birth.

#277
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

The thing is we see no evidence that there was any "mob" ready to beseige the city after Ander's Act let alone against the mages.  However, there is plenty of evidence of Chantry wrong doing both currently and historically.

-Polaris


What evidence would you need to see to believe that maybe there really was a mob forming?

You don't see anyone raging in the streets of Kirkwall forming a mob; you don't see anyone taking up arms in the name of an Exalted March, either. You don't hear about a mob that formed during the epilogue of the game; you don't hear the words "Exalted March" at the end of the game, either.

For the mob we have Meredith's word (one incompetant person's view) and a history of mob behavior, and for the March we have Leliana and Elthina's word (two incompetant people's view) and a history of Chantry behavior.

#278
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Blood mages were clearly the source of all the problems in Kirkwall. Not Meredith. Had there not been a major blood mage problem in Kirkwall (even prior to Meredith's reign), then none of DA2 would have happened. If it was another KC than meredith, a lot of all the problems would STILL have happened. So, perhaps it is time you lay blame where it is due?.... Oh waht am I thinking, that would be blaming the poor and always innocent mages, who could enver dream of harming another living being.



As always, you miss the point, but I expect no less. You assume that those of us who think the templars and Chantry are a bunch of idiots automatically assume the mages are innocent. I do not believe all mages are innocent. I do however see the mages, due to their lesser status, and the fact that they are not part of a single organizqation, but a group of people who share a common genetic trait. They do not have an organized chain of command structure, or central authority. Nor are they even of a common political or ideological goal. They are a demographic. Not an organization.

When I see insane blood mages attacking people, I eliminate them, pure and simple. Something I would not have to be doing if the templars were competant. Many of the blood mages I've met are insane. I do not blame insane, crazy, or mentally unstable people for doing bad things, because that's exactly what I expect them to do. That's why we have authorities and institutions in place, to protect people from from the crazies and psychos. As well as to treat and rehabilitate them, if it is possible. Individual mages are to blame for their own actions if bad, because they are individuals.

The templars, on the other hand, are the authorities, who have been granted alot of power and control to keep the mages in check, underwraps, and under the humb, on the condition they keep mages out of sight and out of mind, and keep both society safe from mages, and mages safe from themselves. However, they have failed miserably at their task, even though they have absolute power in the case of mages. With power comes the responsibility of wielding it effectively and practically. When those in power can't do their job, they need to be revlieved of that power, and the power given to someone who can handle the responsibility competantly.

Meredith's brutal measures against the mages were certainly legal, as far as the Chantry is concerned, since the Chantry doesn't really view mages as proper people anyway. Sometimes, brutal measures, when applied carefully and intelligently, are very effective. meredith, however, was an idiot who couldn't apply the tools of command effectively, nor could she come up with a plan to deal with the psycho mages she believed were everywhere. She created a climate where corruption and criminal mage activity not only thrived, but a climate that turned civilians against her and made them sympathise with the mages more, who are supposed to be criminals, and fearsome things.

When people start supporting and asisting those who are considered criminal and dangerous by their society because they despise the authorities they once supported, that's incompetance. And it is purely the fault of the authorities, because it is THEIR responsibility to keep the mages in check, and do so in a manner that bolsters confidence in the people by their descisions.

They did not. Because the Chantry consists of a bunch of idiots who can't wield power responsibly or effectively. And when the sh*t hits the fan on this scale, it is always the fault of those in power for allowing extremist and renegade elements to thrive. That's incompetance. And I always hold those in power responsible, because they themselves chose to take power and rule over everyone. Power isn't a reward. Those who take power better have the friggin brains, resolve, and plan to rule effectively, or be prepared to accept the full consequences of their failure.

#279
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 948 messages
There probably was an anti-mage mob forming. But protecting Mages from mobs is one thing Circles are supposed to be there for. And it's not like the Gallows isn't defenisible.

#280
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages

Wulfram wrote...

There probably was an anti-mage mob forming. But protecting Mages from mobs is one thing Circles are supposed to be there for. And it's not like the Gallows isn't defenisible.



Exactly. If a mob was forming, Meredith, since she took it upon herself to rule Kirkwall, had the responsibility to use her templars to help quell the mobs. She could have implemented a total lockdown of the Circle, as was her right, and sent some templars out in the city to keep order. From the codexes and Cullen's comments about the Qunari in Act 2, the Templars have an enormous force in Kirkwall, one that seems to outnumber the mages. I'm sure she could spare templars to go out into the city and assist, and still have plenty left over to lock down the Gallows and force a search. And orsino would just have to deal with it, meredith overrules him. She does not need his permission to search the Circle, anymore than a prison warden needs the inmates permission to conduct strip searches and shakedowns of the prison population.

Again, that's what a competant commander would have done. Which Meredith is not.

#281
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
So basically you expect blood mages to behave poorly, yet you continuesly try and prevent the Templars from doing their job? And then berrate them for having trouble fulfilling their purpose.

And actually Meredith's brutal measures WAS efefective. She all but decimated the mage udnerground, which previously had been a thorn in the side of Kirkwall's Templars. So she did her job, and brilliantly so apparently. However, Kirkwall's mage infestation was extensive, and Meredith and her Templars can't capture all mages at once, especially not when there are asocial pricks like Hawke, who (potentially) continuesly prevent the Templars from doing their job.

When people start supporting the suppressed side, is the underdog support syndrome. People have a knack for romatic stories. And few stories are more romantic than the underdog fighting against insurmountable odds. And since Templars have done such a perfect job at keeping the public safe (generally) throughout the ages, people have forgotten the danger mages psoe, and thus grow more sympathetic towards them.

#282
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages
And soon enough, templars will no longer be able to pose a threat to mages. Not the current order, anyway.

#283
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Meredith's mention of a mob is imagined - she's acting on what she imagines will be the reaction of the people.  


"Leliana's mention of an Exalted March is imagined - she's acting on what she imagines will be the reaction of the Divine."

phaonica wrote...

You have implied that, despite what Meredith would have you believe, there would be no mob to or not to appease because there is no evidence that the mages Meredith wants to kill are involved with the destruction of the Chantry, except the misguided conclusions that Meredith might propose to the mob.


I have implied no such thing. I addressed that Meredith has ordered the execution of an entire population of people for an act that Anders alone is responsible for.


I'm asking you why you think there would be no mob. The Chantry was destroyed, and you don't think the people are going to ask questions and demand that someone be punished? You don't think that Meredith herself could  give them suggestions as to whom was responsible and thus practically create the mob? 

LobselVith8 wrote...
I'm addressing in this thread the potential threat that Leliana poses if she encourages an Exalted March against Hawke's home. I'd imagine Hawke may care more about saving his home than sparing Leliana, especially if she's going to back a plan to attack Kirkwall.


And I'm addressing in this thread that it doesn't make sense for you to claim that Leliana's Exalted March is more certain than a riot forming due to the destruction of the Chantry. If you think that people question enough and have enough discretion to not form a mob, and thus are no threat, then Leliana's potential March is not a threat, either, because the Chantry is also made up of people.

#284
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

So basically you expect blood mages to behave poorly, yet you continuesly try and prevent the Templars from doing their job? And then berrate them for having trouble fulfilling their purpose.



I am preventing the templars from doing their job? You know this, or do you assume that? I would stop with the assumptions, you are looking foolish in doing so.

If anything, I spent 3 acts doing the templar's job for them, because they were too stupid and incompetant to do their job themselves. Nor did I always help the mages out. Sometimes I did, sometimes I didn't, depending on the situation. I generally kill blood mages more often than not, even if given a chance to spare them.


However, Hawke is a civilian. It is not Hawke's job to go root out blood mages and apostates. That's the templars job. When I am getting attacked in the streets and having to defend myself from escaped nutjobs, it is because the templars aren't doing their jobs. Hawke has spent 3 acts dealing with and cleaning up the templar's incompetance. Even meredith has to go to hawke to hunt down three apostates, because she's useless.



And actually Meredith's brutal measures WAS efefective. She all but decimated the mage udnerground, which previously had been a thorn in the side of Kirkwall's Templars. So she did her job, and brilliantly so apparently. However, Kirkwall's mage infestation was extensive, and Meredith and her Templars can't capture all mages at once, especially not when there are asocial pricks like Hawke, who (potentially) continuesly prevent the Templars from doing their job.



I don't know if you are being serious here, but this part makes me facepalm about as much as meredith herself did. Meredith squashed the Mage Underground....only to have Kirkwall blow up with escaped blood mages, apostates, and abominations running amok in Kirkwall, and her own templars plotting to remove her. Even to the point that Cullen, her most avid supporter, thought she had lost it. Not to mention that by Act 3, the whole city had turned against her.

So she crushes on underground organization, only to end up with the the city completely out of control. You call this competance?

*shakes head* The fact that you blame Hawke is even more laughable. Hawke might help a handful of mages escape. If meredith efforts are being undone because of one person (a person who I found to be pretty lazy, useless, and ineffective anyways, regardless of who they side with), then that further cements my arguement that the templars are morons, if they can be so easily thwarted by one idiot.

And even when Hawke is pro-templar, and helps the templars in every way possible, Kirkwall is still overrun in Act 3 by blood mages and abominations. So tell me, who is standing in the templars way then? Even with a pro-Templar Hawke, the templars still can't do their jobs. Incompetance.

When people start supporting the suppressed side, is the underdog support syndrome. People have a knack for romatic stories. And few stories are more romantic than the underdog fighting against insurmountable odds. And since Templars have done such a perfect job at keeping the public safe (generally) throughout the ages, people have forgotten the danger mages psoe, and thus grow more sympathetic towards them.



Now I really can't take you seriously. Templars doing a perfect job? LOL!

Furthermore, you are totally wrong about the "underdog" syndrome. from origins to DA2, it is pretty well established that most people in Thedas fear the mages and support their imprisonment. They do not have sympathy and support for the mages because they are the underdogs. They are doing so because they have ended up hating the templars even more than they fear the mages. The people, for over 1000 years, have not cared what the templars were doing to mages in the Circles, and fully supported the extreme measures. Theodsians themselves do support underdogs, given the way they treat elves as well as mages.

That Meredith has turned the love against her in a population that was cool with her anti-mage policies earlier shows what an idiot she is.

As for me the player, I do not support underdogs automatically, nor do I see anything "romantic and heroic" about doing so. I oppose the templars/Chantry because they are dangerous, incompetant idiots, and I find institutional stupidity on the part of the authorities an unforgivable sin. And the Chantry and templars are 100% guilty of this.

The mages? They need to be dealt with. By people competant and intelligent enough to deal with them effectively and practically. Which is neither the templars or the Chantry.

#285
Aradace

Aradace
  • Members
  • 4 359 messages

Sabariel wrote...

Even if there was the option to kill her, she wouldn't stay dead anyway ;)


.....Unfortunately.....<_<

#286
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Lelianna has already made up her mind.  If you try to tell her things aren't that bad (which is what Elthina asked you to do btw), Lelianna completely disregards whatever you say and demands that the grand cleric leave Kirkwall.

That isn't a "possibility" of an Exalted March.  It's a certainty.

-Polaris


The Exalted March is not a certainty. We don't know if Leliana is the only person sent to investigate. We don't know if the Divine will act on Leliana's condemnation alone. We don't even know if an Exalted March was called at all after the uprising in Kirkwall.

Either way, I think I'm going to bow out now because the thread feels like nothing more than everyone insulting each other now. So you all have fun with that.

#287
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...

[quote]EmperorSahlertz wrote...

So basically you expect blood mages to behave poorly, yet you continuesly try and prevent the Templars from doing their job? And then berrate them for having trouble fulfilling their purpose.[/quote]

I am preventing the templars from doing their job? You know this, or do you assume that? I would stop with the assumptions, you are looking foolish in doing so.

If anything, I spent 3 acts doing the templar's job for them, because they were too stupid and incompetant to do their job themselves. Nor did I always help the mages out. Sometimes I did, sometimes I didn't, depending on the situation. I generally kill blood mages more often than not, even if given a chance to spare them. [/quote]
Only if I was wrong. But since it is quite clear that you are a mage sympathizer, I would think it safe to assume that you, for instance, let Feynriel go to the Dalish, and then helpåed the dalish kill the Templars at their camp (or at least talked the Templars down), helped Grace escape, sided with Orsino, and protected the amges during the annulment. So... How far off was I? And if I was correct on the points made, then you effectively hindrered the Templars doing their job.


[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
However, Hawke is a civilian. It is not Hawke's job to go root out blood mages and apostates. That's the templars job. When I am getting attacked in the streets and having to defend myself from escaped nutjobs, it is because the templars aren't doing their jobs. Hawke has spent 3 acts dealing with and cleaning up the templar's incompetance. Even meredith has to go to hawke to hunt down three apostates, because she's useless.  [/quote]
Only during act three are there any loose blood mages on the streets of Kirkwall. Even then, most of the bloodrager npcs (or whatever they are called), are actually blood thralls, and not mages themselves.
Furthermore. Since you are claiming that she caputres zero apostates. I'm guessing you got a compelte record of all apostates captured during Meredith's time as Knight-Commander. Oh wait... You don't. So how about you stop using a word like "incompetence", for when it is actually warranted?


[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
[quote]And actually Meredith's brutal measures WAS efefective. She all but decimated the mage udnerground, which previously had been a thorn in the side of Kirkwall's Templars. So she did her job, and brilliantly so apparently. However, Kirkwall's mage infestation was extensive, and Meredith and her Templars can't capture all mages at once, especially not when there are asocial pricks like Hawke, who (potentially) continuesly prevent the Templars from doing their job.[/quote]

I don't know if you are being serious here, but this part makes me facepalm about as much as meredith herself did. Meredith squashed the Mage Underground....only to have Kirkwall blow up with escaped blood mages, apostates, and abominations running amok in Kirkwall, and her own templars plotting to remove her. Even to the point that Cullen, her most avid supporter, thought she had lost it. Not to mention that by Act 3, the whole city had turned against her.[/quote]
Kirkwall did not "blow up" with blood mages. The blood amges had always been there, yet by act 3 they were getting disparate, and thus more "public" if you will. It also lead to the timely death, so evidently even then Meredith's tactic worked. Actually Meredith's leniency was what caused the incident at the Gallows. Had Meredith just been less lenient and captured Anders and/or Hawke from when they arrived, all would have beena voided.

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
So she crushes on underground organization, only to end up with the the city completely out of control. You call this competance? [/quote]
The city was completely udner her control. The Circle wasn't. Due to Orsino's constant opposition to her.

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
*shakes head* The fact that you blame Hawke is even more laughable. Hawke might help a handful of mages escape. If meredith efforts are being undone because of one person (a person who I found to be pretty lazy, useless, and ineffective anyways, regardless of who they side with), then that further cements my arguement that the templars are morons, if they can be so easily thwarted by one idiot. [/quote]
That Hawke aids some amges, cause a Templar failure in that particular instance. These instances are what causes you to claim Templar incompetence, when YOU are the sole reason for Templar failure. But of course, I did not realize you had a complete charter over apostates captured in Kirkwall (zero), and was thus in a position to claim Templar incompetence. That is of course my mistake.

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
And even when Hawke is pro-templar, and helps the templars in every way possible, Kirkwall is still overrun in Act 3 by blood mages and abominations. So tell me, who is standing in the templars way then? Even with a pro-Templar Hawke, the templars still can't do their jobs. Incompetance. [/quote]
Kirkwall ISN'T overrun. The mere fact that the blood amges only venture out during night, should tell you as much. What it does mean though, is that the Blood mages begins to operate more visually, probably in concert with the resolutionist, and the underground remnants. It all leads to their death though, as I said.

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
[quote]When people start supporting the suppressed side, is the underdog support syndrome. People have a knack for romatic stories. And few stories are more romantic than the underdog fighting against insurmountable odds. And since Templars have done such a perfect job at keeping the public safe (generally) throughout the ages, people have forgotten the danger mages psoe, and thus grow more sympathetic towards them.[/quote]

Now I really can't take you seriously. Templars doing a perfect job? LOL! [/quote]
In Thedas overall. Tempalrs MUST have done a good job at keeping the public safe, since the public now have a view of mages as being unduely oppressed. If the public had a general consensus that amges was ultimate evil, they wouldn't support them. The amges have pulled off the PR stunt of the century, and appeared the victim for so long, that the public never saw it comming when the mages showed their true color...

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...

Furthermore, you are totally wrong about the "underdog" syndrome. from origins to DA2, it is pretty well established that most people in Thedas fear the mages and support their imprisonment. They do not have sympathy and support for the mages because they are the underdogs. They are doing so because they have ended up hating the templars even more than they fear the mages. The people, for over 1000 years, have not cared what the templars were doing to mages in the Circles, and fully supported the extreme measures. Theodsians themselves do support underdogs, given the way they treat elves as well as mages.[/quote]
Obviously I am not, since the public began to support the mages.

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
That Meredith has turned the love against her in a population that was cool with her anti-mage policies earlier shows what an idiot she is. [/quote]
Or how fickle public relations can be...

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
As for me the player, I do not support underdogs automatically, nor do I see anything "romantic and heroic" about doing so. I oppose the templars/Chantry because they are dangerous, incompetant idiots, and I find institutional stupidity on the part of the authorities an unforgivable sin. And the Chantry and templars are 100% guilty of this. [/quote]
No one supports underdogs automatically (except contrarians maybe), it is however a common trait to support the ones with the least chance of succes.

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
The mages? They need to be dealt with. By people competant and intelligent enough to deal with them effectively and practically. Which is neither the templars or the Chantry.

[/quote]
Mages needs to be in the Circles. And if they won't... Well, the Rite of Tranquility is underrated..

#288
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Kirkwall did not "blow up" with blood mages. The blood amges had always been there, yet by act 3 they were getting disparate, and thus more "public" if you will. It also lead to the timely death, so evidently even then Meredith's tactic worked. Actually Meredith's leniency was what caused the incident at the Gallows. Had Meredith just been less lenient and captured Anders and/or Hawke from when they arrived, all would have beena voided.

They were beneath Meredith's notice until it was too late to do anything without risking her position, and they weren't causing that much trouble, relatively.

Mages needs to be in the Circles. And if they won't... Well, the Rite of Tranquility is underrated..

And if you would pursue this unto battle, you will need to die.

#289
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 233 messages
[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...

[quote]Lord Aesir wrote...


Just about anyone could see that Kirkwall might be headed in the direction Anders pushed it.  He only speeded the process along.  Knowing that widespread devestating harm could result generates very real very rational concerns, concerns that she took to heart and sent her most trusted agent to investigate.  Why would she assume the problem was on the Templar's end when foreign Mages not in the circle were stirring up much of the trouble?  Besides, Meredith was not incompetent in her duties, just overly harsh in their fulfillment.  What would the Seekers do?  Tell her not to guard the Mages more closely when it is a very real possibility some of them may be working with the Resolutionists?[/quote]

Because the Templars are ruling Kirkwall. They are the ones in charge of the place. And the Divine is in charge of them. It's called Chain of command. In normal, competant military or political organizations, it works. In the case of the Chantry, it's virtually non-existant.

And Anders did not push Kirkwall in any direction until he blew up the Chantry. which came at the end of act 3. After the Divine's agent had long been gone. He only matters in the picture at that point, before that, he's just another faceless apostate milling about Kirkwall. Before that, it was Meredith, and probably Orsino, though we don't see anything going on with the Circle mages at all, so its hard to tell.

Regardless, Chain of command. Sh*t rolls uphill as well as downhill. It was clearly obvious the Chain of command was breaking down, especially when Meredith was going over Elthina's head to get her annulment invoked.[/quote] I repeat, what would a different Knight Commander do?  Meredith did what one would expect, though more harshly than she should have by a far stretch.  A Knight Commander may anwser to the Divine, but the Divine is effectively half a world away.  With such limited communication, the Chain of command by necesity requires the Divine to put a great deal of trust in regional leaders (Not that this necesarily works, RL empires have been broken by this necesity), in Kirkwall that meant Meredith and Elthina, both of whom had apparently fulfilled their duties before that time well enough (She was actually only appointed as Divine around the same time Hawke defeated the Qunari, so she had nothing to due with Elthina or Meredith's appointments).

Actually I only meant that the observable trend was pushing it in the same direction Anders gave the final calamitous push towards.


[/quote]  [quote] [quote]No, the first thing she should be looking into is the cause of the trouble.  And she did, she found that the Resolutionists are stirring up trouble for the Templars, setting off the reaction I mentioned earlier.  Guilty mages should matter to you when judging the divine's actions.  They certainly matter to the Divine and factor into her decision.  Why send Seekers when the source of the troubles is a group of Mages, and thus a Templar issue?  Clearly, she realized that the Templars of Kirkwall were not succeeding in their task, for she thought an Exalted March might be necesary to contain their failure.
[/quote]

Yes, she should be looking into the cause of the trouble. The problem was, she was only looking at the Resolutionists, and they were only part of the problem, and a problem that was growing due to the incompetance and mismanagement of Meredith and Elthina. She can worry about resolutionists till her heart's content, and ignore her own ranks that are creating the situation where extremists thrive.

Meredith was fully incompetant. Hell, you don't even need an investigation that deep to reveal this fact.

1. She had turned the City of Kirkwall against the Templars. Templars, who are often seen by the common folk as valiant protectors, are now seen as Tyrants and assh*les by the common folk. That Meredith destroyed perhaps the Templar's most powerful resource, the love and respect of the common people, should have been looked at right then and there, because this is something unheard of in most of the rest of Thedas. Where templars are still respected and loved by the common folk. And this has been going on for years, because in Act 1, Cullen even says that people are starting to look unkindly at the Templar order. This reeks of incompetance.

2. Her own men were conspiring with blood mages to overthrow her. Hello. Red flags. If there was any reason to investigate the templars that in itself should have garnered a closer look.

3. Kirkwall in Act 3 was overrun with escaped apostates. The Templar's job is to hunt them down and keep them under wraps. They are obviously failing miserably at this task. That alone should make the Divine send a whole unit of Seekers to figure out what the problem is. Why the Templars are not doing their job. And well...isn't that was the Seekers are supposed to do? Step in when Templars are failing their duties?

4. Orsino. Meredith, as Knight Commander, could have very well forced Orsino to allow her to search the tower for corruption. The mages are under the Templar's rule. templars have the final say, pretty much, and if meredith was that convinced the tower was corrupt, she could have forced the search, whether the mages liked it or not. She did not. Because she's an idiot.

5. Flagrant abuses were taking place right under her nose, there was corruption in her own ranks. As a military commander, it is not only her job, but responsibility to keep order and function within her own ranks, and to know everything that is happening amongst her men. If she knew about it, she was condoning it. If she didn't, she was an incompetant commander, because it is her job and duty to know exactly what her men are doing. That's standard in ANY military chain of command, and a commander who tried to claim ignorance of their troops actions in a court martial would get stripped of rank and thrown in the brig, and laughed out of the courtroom.

The reason I said I do not care about the resolutionists, is because they are not shown at all, and only mentioned by leliana. Before the quest Faith, I'd spent about 4-5 years in Kirkwall, never meeting any, nor encountering a group of them, or discovering any plot of theirs. Only Act 3 mention of them.

While I do not doubt that they are involved in some manner, the level of their involvement seems pretty minor, with what I've seen in the game. Since I've never met any at all. or really know exactly how they are supposed be stirring things up, I really don't care what they are doing. I don't even hear rumors, or get little hints or evidence, of their activity. other than the Mage Underground, which has been mostly helping apostates escape, something that is not unusual. We had the Mage's Collective in Ferelden, after all.

It was poor writing, I'll admit. If they wanted to have the mages play an equal role in Kirkwall's troubles, they should have shown, and not told us, about the resolutionists. They did not. All they showed me were batsh*t crazy apostates and blood mages. And while problematic in their own right, they are small potatoes compared to what was going on in the bigger picture of Kirkwall. They looked to me more  a symptom of breakdown, incompetance, and corruption, not the cause. The Divine is looking into the symptoms, but not the cause, in Kirkwall.

And the biggest cause of everything I saw boiled down to the two in charge: Meredith and Elthina. Elthina couldn't keep her own zealots in check (Petrice and her templar accomplices) and they almost caused the Qunari to take over. And she did absolutely nothing about Meredith and Orsino, two people she was not only in a position of authroity over, but had the distinct responsibility, as part of her job, to deal with them should they get out of hand.

The  actions of a terrorist group should be secondary to the Divine's concerns when her own ranks are full of corruption, incompetance, and lazieness. That the Divine sent one person, leliana, to investigate the situation, shows she's an idiot. She should have sent an entire contingent of Seekers to investigate everyone in Kirkwall. Instead of sending one person to decide if the city needs to be destroyed.

That is, if the Divine had a brain. Which she clearly does not. Like her predecessors, she is quick to consider an exalted march as a solution for a problem that could have been solved through less violent means. But that's the Chantry in a nutshell.


[/quote]  Why would she send a contigent of Seekers to investigate the so called incompetence if your primary reasoning for having the Seekers sent is the very things you believe they should be sent to discover?  Just saying, it seems like you expect them to know about these things beforehand.  The Divine's reports come from Elthina and Meredith.  Frankly, that she sent Leliana at all shows that she knew something was amiss.  Like I said, Meredith reacts to Mages.  I don't think replacing her would have made much of a difference.  Any Knight Commander would have been enacting stricter and stricter policies in the sames situation, though hers were more extreme than most.  The cause that brought about them were mages like the Resolutionists, though not them alone.  I don't see how turning the common people against her (Which seems inevitable in a circumstance where the Templars must root out maleficarum and apostates, who are appearing in greater numbers than before, from among them, as in any insurgancy situation) has anything to do with a failure in the duties of a Knight Commander containing and hunting down rogue mages.

Perhaps that should have raised a red flag, or perhaps the Templars were being controlled by the blood mages.  That is probably what went into the report, and no matter her investigation, Leliana wasn't there to witness it so I don't see how she might have known otherwise considering all those mages and Templars are killed save one scared repentant mage who might just parrot the Templar's story.

Or Leliana takes this as an indication that the problems in Kirkwall are growing beyond the ability of the Templars, even in their multitudes in Kirkwall, are able to control, further supporting the idea that an Exalted March must be necesary to contain the situation.  This is solely an indication of the dire circumstances in Kirkwall, it is not an indication that fault lies with Meredith or a group like the Resolutionists one way or another.  Also, I'd like to add that even if what you think should happen happened, the process would not be an overnight deal.  What do you think would happen while the Templars were weakened?

Actually you are slightly off.  Orsino doesn't have the authority to stop the search.  Meredith knows that.  However, Elthina does, and Orsino was going to see her.  That is the only reason Meredith was arguing with him then.

As I understand it, these abuses occur with varying frequency in every Circle in Thedas and I really doubt even the strictest Knight Commander would be able to discover and root out every corrupt Templar that took advantage of the helpless mages.  Is it a strike against Meredith?  Yes.  Is it grounds to remove her from command?  Only if the Divine was prepared to strip ever Knight Commander in existence of the same and replace them with Commanders that would do no better.  Perhaps she should try, but I doubt it would make a difference and apparently so does the Divine.

We can agree on that much.  The Resolutionists or other groups like them should have been given greater prominence.  It is worthy to note, however, that things only started getting more terrible for mages than usual in Kirkwall in and just before Act 3, when the Resolutionists were revealed.  I think that's important.

Keep in mind that all those crazy mages are part of the big picture.  They exasterbate the problem no less than the Resolutionists, though with less direct intent.  They still provoke the same reaction from the Templars, stricter controls and clamp downs to hunt them down and prevent more from escaping.  The Mage underground may have released some of those crazed apostates, so I can't put them under any sort of innocence label either.  It seems we disagree on the relationship between them.  You see Meredith and the Templars as the cause and rogue maleficarum and the like as symptoms.  I see the Resoltionists and their ilk as the cause and Meredith a symptom that togther kicked the whole vicious cycle into motion.

The whole point of sending one person was so that it would be easier to collect information without being discovered.  To that end, the Divine sent her most trusted agent to find out how bad the situation was and if a group like the Resolutionists was behind it.  She found that the Resolutionists were stirring up quite a bit of trouble, which was provoking Meredith's harsh policies.  Heavily investigating and thus paralyzing the Templars would not help this, quite the opposite, even just replacing Meredith would only delay the issue.  As I can only imagine the Divine would view things in the light that a city crawling with maleficarum abominations and apostates would not last long without Templars, I'd say that she made the wiser decision.

I have no argument about Elthina.  She was a nice old lady, but clearly senile.  Actually, I think she may well have forgotten she had the authority she did. :?

Modifié par Lord Aesir, 24 septembre 2011 - 09:25 .


#290
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Wulfram wrote...

It is not a fact that the Divine is considering an Exalted March.  All we know is that she was highly concerned by the situation in Kirkwall 
In fact, not even Elthina actually suggests this as a prospect, she only uses it as an illustration that the concern of the Divine is dangerous to attract.


The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Regarding the bolded, it makes me wonder if Leliana asked Hawke to get Elthina to leave so that maybe Meredith would call for an Annulment on the mages who are the problem in her eyes.


David Gaider wrote

So long as the Grand Cleric was alive and refused Meredith's request for
the Right of Annulment, Meredith's only option was to appeal to the
Divine. Once the Grand Cleric was dead, and no immediate successor in
evidence, Meredith had the legal authority she needed.




If you read the thread you pulled that out of, you would realize that DG was extremely clear that a Knight Commander could call an annullment on her own authority if there is no Grand Cleric readily available to authorize it.  It might mean the Grand Cleric was dead, but if the Grand Cleric were say in a coma, then the same would still apply....as would the Grand Cleric's absence.

In a rational chain of command, that authority would have fallen instead to the next senior member of the clergy (and this is implied in DAO), but we have WoG that says that if the Grand Cleric can not give authorization, then the authority does in fact fall to the Knight Commander.

Read the entire thread (or better yet go ask DG yourself).

-Polaris

#291
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
You realize that in the very quote of DG, DG himself clearly states that if no clear successor to the dead Grand Cleric is present, then and only then, can the Knight-Commander call for an annulment.

#292
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 233 messages
I'd guess that successor went up with the Chantry as well.

#293
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 948 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

If you read the thread you pulled that out of, you would realize that DG was extremely clear that a Knight Commander could call an annullment on her own authority if there is no Grand Cleric readily available to authorize it.  It might mean the Grand Cleric was dead, but if the Grand Cleric were say in a coma, then the same would still apply....as would the Grand Cleric's absence.

In a rational chain of command, that authority would have fallen instead to the next senior member of the clergy (and this is implied in DAO), but we have WoG that says that if the Grand Cleric can not give authorization, then the authority does in fact fall to the Knight Commander.

Read the entire thread (or better yet go ask DG yourself).

-Polaris


That was the only post in that thread by Mr Gaider on the subject.  But I traced the conversation back to a previous thread, in he which he says

A Knight-Commander is second-in-command next to the Grand Cleric. With
Elthina's death, Meredith was legally in command of the Kirkwall
Chantry-- such as it was, and certainly in the absence of any ranking
Revered Mother or the Divine herself


and later, in response to you bringing up the apparent contradiction with events in Origins

Greagoir is out of contact with the Grand Cleric. He has no reason to believe she is dead or had no successor.

Both of which appear to support the conclusion that Elthina's death, not merely her absence, is necessary for Meredith to have lawful authority to Annull the Circle.

#294
Monica21

Monica21
  • Members
  • 5 603 messages

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
However, Hawke is a civilian. It is not Hawke's job to go root out blood mages and apostates. That's the templars job. When I am getting attacked in the streets and having to defend myself from escaped nutjobs, it is because the templars aren't doing their jobs. Hawke has spent 3 acts dealing with and cleaning up the templar's incompetance. Even meredith has to go to hawke to hunt down three apostates, because she's useless.

Meredith says that they found most of the apostates but there are three they're having trouble with. She asks you because you have influence in the city and she wants you to know what they're dealing with. In the case of two of the apostates, they came back to their parents/wife after the Templars questioned them. In the other case, it was a couple kids from Darktown trying to protect the woman who brought them over. 

In two cases, the apostates are abominations, kind of proving Meredith's point.

Modifié par Monica21, 24 septembre 2011 - 10:28 .


#295
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 988 messages
wait... I'm a bit confused. Is it upon the Grand Cleric's death that the Knight Commander takes on the mantle of Grand Cleric? Or is it only when the entire Chantry clergy has been obliterated that the Knight Commander assumes that role?

Because if the Knight Commander is second-in-command, wouldn't that mean that upon the Grand Cleric's death he/she would automatically become the acting Grand Cleric?

#296
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
They don't assume that role, but they are second in command. The Knight-Commander retains the rank of Knight-Commander, but without a Grand Cleric, a Knight-Commander is the highest ranking Chantry member. So they get to decide wether or not an annulment is needed. However, usually whenever a Grand Cleric dies, the entire Chantry she was a part of, does not disintegrated aswell, so a Revered Mother is usually appointed to replace her.

#297
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages
[quote]EmperorSahlertz wrote...

[quote]Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...

Only if I was wrong. But since it is quite clear that you are a mage sympathizer, I would think it safe to assume that you, for instance, let Feynriel go to the Dalish, and then helpåed the dalish kill the Templars at their camp (or at least talked the Templars down), helped Grace escape, sided with Orsino, and protected the amges during the annulment. So... How far off was I? And if I was correct on the points made, then you effectively hindrered the Templars doing their job.[/quote]

It is quite clear you know nothing about me, if you think I am a mage sympathizer. You make assumptions and generalizations simply because I find the Chantry and templars to be unforgivably stupid, and assume that means I must automatically support in theory the mages. And it just makes you look silly and pretentious.

My first playthrough was made trying to get a feel for who is who, and who does what. I had made no canon descisions. My second playthrough (not finished) however, is being made more on descisions I plan to stick with. Some are mage friendly, some are not.

As far as your examples:

I did help the Dalish kill the templars in my first playthrough. because they were beating up a Dalish kid. I do not side with brutish bullies. And regardless what the Templars think, I still see the Dalish as their own seperate cultural and tribal entity outside of the Chantry.

In my second playthrough, however, I sent Fenriyel off to the Circle, because he is an unusual and special case of a mage that needs alot of specific attention and confinement, due to the very unusual and potentially dangerous nature of his magic connection.

Grace and her crew? Havent really decided on that one yet. I've played with different options there. First time I did save her. And guess what...she ended up in the Gallows anyway, so obviously, Hawke really didn't do much to stymie templar efforts, since they got her anyway.  I didn't help her crew escape because I was sympathetic to her idiot blood mage cabal. because Thrask was such a nice, reasonable, sane templar, I was going to convince the mages to surrender peacefully. And then I met Ser Kerras and his band of merry pscho assh*les. And reloaded.

But as I said before, Grace ends up in the Circle regardless. So Hawke "interfering" with the templars duty is pretty weak in this case, since they get them anyway, whatever route you choose.


Yes, I did side with orsino. because of the two options, there was no way in hell I was siding with Meredith, the woman was not only an incompetant moron, she was a psycho, and I spent much of the game having to deal with the BS of her templars and her incompetance. I don't even like orsino that much, he's an idiot too. But he is the lesser of two idiots, and since meredith's annulment was completely idiotic and based on even less logic than her entire reign was, I sided with a lesser of two evils. Or more like, the lesser of two idiots. Had there been an option to tell them both to f*ck off, i would have, but the game did not leave me that choice.

And since the choice to side with orsino has come at the end of the game, it has nothing to do with Hawke "interferring" with the templars, because by that point, the situation had blown up.


[quote]Only during act three are there any loose blood mages on the streets of Kirkwall. Even then, most of the bloodrager npcs (or whatever they are called), are actually blood thralls, and not mages themselves.
Furthermore. Since you are claiming that she caputres zero apostates. I'm guessing you got a compelte record of all apostates captured during Meredith's time as Knight-Commander. Oh wait... You don't. So how about you stop using a word like "incompetence", for when it is actually warranted?[/quote]

In Meredith's case, it is totally warranted. And given that the Templars keep getting Hawke to do their dirty work for them shows me they are incompetant. It would be like some idiot cop demanding Joe Q Civilian go raid a crackhouse full of armed nuts. It's a cops job, and if the cops are expecting (or intimidating) civilians to do their jobs for them, I'd say that's incompetance.

I never claimed she captured zero apostates. She probably caught a few (with Hawke's help). Yet the situation is still out of control, and controlling mages entails alot more than just bulling civilians, killing suspected maleficar, or enacting draconian measures. If Meredith is too stupid to realize this, she should be replaced by a Knight Commander with a brain.



[quote]Kirkwall did not "blow up" with blood mages. The blood amges had always been there, yet by act 3 they were getting disparate, and thus more "public" if you will. It also lead to the timely death, so evidently even then Meredith's tactic worked. Actually Meredith's leniency was what caused the incident at the Gallows. Had Meredith just been less lenient and captured Anders and/or Hawke from when they arrived, all would have beena voided.[/quote]

Meredith's leniancy? Lol. I'm not even going to comment on that, that just goes beyond the realm of believability here. Meredith was never lenient, and everyone drives this point home. It was her brutality that were turning her own men against her, or have you forgotten that part, where Cullen at first supports her harshness, and then later decides she's gone too far, even for his rather harsh views.

[quote]The city was completely udner her control. The Circle wasn't. Due to Orsino's constant opposition to her.[/quote]

And she could have removed Orsino, if she felt he was corrupt. If she felt orsino was such a problem, she could have removed him years ago with no problems. She has the say in such matters. And the Circle would have to abide by her edict.

The city was not under control by any means. it blew up as a result of years of mismanagement. Which is what i would have expected, really.

[quote]That Hawke aids some amges, cause a Templar failure in that particular instance. These instances are what causes you to claim Templar incompetence, when YOU are the sole reason for Templar failure. But of course, I did not realize you had a complete charter over apostates captured in Kirkwall (zero), and was thus in a position to claim Templar incompetence. That is of course my mistake.[/quote]

Again, please stop making assumptions about what i did in my game.

i don't need a charter to declare templar incompetance. The fact the templars kept trying to get me to do their dirty work for them shows they have serious problems doing the job they were paid for.

[quote]Kirkwall ISN'T overrun. The mere fact that the blood amges only venture out during night, should tell you as much. What it does mean though, is that the Blood mages begins to operate more visually, probably in concert with the resolutionist, and the underground remnants. It all leads to their death though, as I said.[/quote]

It isn't? Then all those apostates and blood mages attacking me in act 3 must have been my imagination. Silly me. Of course by this point, the templars were already plotting to overthrow her. If she was even remotely competant, her own men would not be turning against her. before that point, they supported her.

But you still haven't answered my question: Kirkwall ends up the same regardless of who hawke supports. So obviously, Hawke's actions mean jack sh*t


[quote]In Thedas overall. Tempalrs MUST have done a good job at keeping the public safe, since the public now have a view of mages as being unduely oppressed. If the public had a general consensus that amges was ultimate evil, they wouldn't support them. The amges have pulled off the PR stunt of the century, and appeared the victim for so long, that the public never saw it comming when the mages showed their true color...[/quote]

The public views mages as being oppressed? Really? Are we playing the same game? because most Theodosians I've encountered still hate mages. But thanks to meredith, they have put aside their hate and fear of mages because they see the templars as a bigger problem.

And of course, you continually assume that mages are one singular body/order. PR stunt? the mages didn't need to do anything. Meredith won people over to the mage side due to her actions. The public does not sympathize with mages, except the few that might have mage family members. Everyone else? Dislike them.


[quote]Obviously I am not, since the public began to support the mages.[/quote]

Because of Meredith. Certainly nothing the mages were doing, that's for damned sure. Meredith was seen as a greater danger than the mages were. When I listened to ambiwent banter and talked to people in Kirkwall, hardly anyone supported mages. Instead, what I heard were alot of suspicions and hatred towards Meredith. Which Meredith was doing quite well on her own by being an idiot.



[quote]Or how fickle public relations can be...[/quote]

Seeing how public support for the Circles has been ongoing for about 1000 years, I would say public opinion isn't fickle at all.

[quote]No one supports underdogs automatically (except contrarians maybe), it is however a common trait to support the ones with the least chance of succes.[/quote]

yet I do not, because the mages, not being a definined organization, have plenty of chances of success. Their goals are not unified. the only goal universally for them right now is survival. If they can survive,

[quote]Mages needs to be in the Circles. And if they won't... Well, the Rite of Tranquility is underrated..
[/quote]

Mages need a heavily reformed Circle system. Something that the Chantry and templars can't be a part of, because they have failed miserably for ages. Control and management of Circles, as well as the policing of mages, should be given to a body that can handle the responsibility, something the Chantry has shown itself not to. Not to mention the Chantry has no interest in change or relinquishing control of the Circles, because they lose a signifgant portion of their political and social power by doing so. And the Chantry, like any organized religion, craves power. Yet lacks the competance and responsibility to use it.

So, they should be relived of it. And control and management of the Circles, plus the necessary reforms, should be given to a more competant ruling body. More than likely, a secular govornment. Which is possibly the direction ferelden is going, anyway.

#298
jbrand2002uk

jbrand2002uk
  • Members
  • 990 messages
Correct me if I'm wrong but as I understood it the mages both in and out of the circle are delt with by the templars who are in turn watched by the seekers as which would make them the military police of the chantry.

As for the Bethany situation when you return from the Deep Roads if she stayed behind with your mother its a safe bet Meredith knew where Cullen was going and that he had reinforcements as Meredith says when she meets Hawke during the Qunari uprising that Hawke's name has appeared many times in her reports too many times so its likely she orderd Cullen to take back up incase Hawke got back before they took Bethany away since as it was likely Hawke might resist

#299
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 233 messages

jbrand2002uk wrote...

Correct me if I'm wrong but as I understood it the mages both in and out of the circle are delt with by the templars who are in turn watched by the seekers as which would make them the military police of the chantry.

  The Seekers fulfill that role, but not in any usual matter.  They seem to be as much a shadow arm of the Chantry as Templar police, and they don't seem to be posted in the Circles, but rather sent wherever the Divine feels they are needed.  Most of our information comes from a codex entry whose in-universe author confesses that he can't find much solid information about them.  Their presise function remains vague.

#300
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Wulfram wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

If you read the thread you pulled that out of, you would realize that DG was extremely clear that a Knight Commander could call an annullment on her own authority if there is no Grand Cleric readily available to authorize it.  It might mean the Grand Cleric was dead, but if the Grand Cleric were say in a coma, then the same would still apply....as would the Grand Cleric's absence.

In a rational chain of command, that authority would have fallen instead to the next senior member of the clergy (and this is implied in DAO), but we have WoG that says that if the Grand Cleric can not give authorization, then the authority does in fact fall to the Knight Commander.

Read the entire thread (or better yet go ask DG yourself).

-Polaris


That was the only post in that thread by Mr Gaider on the subject.  But I traced the conversation back to a previous thread, in he which he says

A Knight-Commander is second-in-command next to the Grand Cleric. With
Elthina's death, Meredith was legally in command of the Kirkwall
Chantry-- such as it was, and certainly in the absence of any ranking
Revered Mother or the Divine herself


and later, in response to you bringing up the apparent contradiction with events in Origins

Greagoir is out of contact with the Grand Cleric. He has no reason to believe she is dead or had no successor.

Both of which appear to support the conclusion that Elthina's death, not merely her absence, is necessary for Meredith to have lawful authority to Annull the Circle.


Yes and review both cases carefully.  In the case of Fereldan, Gregoire has no reason to believe that the Grand Cleric isn't there and capable of making an informed decision.  To the best of his personal knowledge the usual communication lines have not (yet) been cut. [He also worries that they might be which is why he is willing to deputize the Wardens in his name to cleanse the circle.]  I also point out that had Gregoire decided to unilaterally invoke the Right of Annulment under those conditions, I doubt anyone (certainly within the Chantry) would have criticized him for it.  However, unlike Meredith, Gregoire doesn't have an insane hatred of all mages.

If Elthina goes to Val Royalouex(sp), then she is effectively abdicating her position with no clear sucessor.  This is legally the same as if she were dead....and KC Meredith especially in her current mode of thought would do the right immediately on the theory that it's better to apologize than to ask for permission if Chantry law gives her even the slightest opening.  Meredith has certainly stretched Chantry law to or past the breaking point in other such matters.  There is no reason to think she wouldn't take the authority here.

-Polaris