Aller au contenu

Photo

Did anyone else want to kill Sister Nightingale?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
585 réponses à ce sujet

#76
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

esper wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

I'd wager it'd be the same speed of delivery. Unless you plan to also kill the Grand Cleric, which would be even harder to conceal.


I doubt that Elthina would tell the Divine - her speciality is after all doing nothing and close her eyes, espically if she thinks it might lead to violence, and if my Hawke has reason to think that a march is going to be called against Kirkwall anyway, she might  as well take the chance. There is nothing to lose at that point. 


She had some kind of correspondence with the Divine iirc, as I imagine Grand clerics usually do. Counting on her not sending word seems odd.

And if you're at the point of "well, might as well" you're not really answering the original question.


My point is that Leliana seems dangerous, and if there is nothing to lose (if Hawke understand Leliana's words as an exalted march is coming anyway - and understanding Hawke easily could get from Leliana's words) and there is chance to push the date for an exalted march by a few weeks or months why not take it? In the worst case scenerio the Divine has lost a spy and her 'left' hand. (it was left, right?)

#77
jbrand2002uk

jbrand2002uk
  • Members
  • 990 messages
right it was left right? now im confused.com

#78
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

esper wrote...

If you are a mage as my Hawke, who publicly supported the first enchanter who is trying to get the nobles to act against the Knight-commander's(illegal) rule in Kirkwall, and live with another apostate (And this should be very easy to hear about if you are a decent spy). It should cross Leliana's mind that coming with vauge threats against the city and saying that other mages is the reason behind the troubles in front of the described Champion is not the smartest nor the most self-preserving statements to make.


That's the same as my Hawke.  But Hawke is also willingly aiding a member of the Chantry by even being there and I still don't see how you can conclude at that time that Hawke is as revolutionary as the Resolutionists when it comes to the Circle and Chantry based on her being an apostate and living with an apostate and thinks Meredith sucks (like most people in Kirkwall do).

I guess I also assume Leliana would have spent most of her time investigating the Resolutionists.

#79
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

jlb524 wrote...

But Hawke is also willingly aiding a member of the Chantry by even being there and I still don't see how you can conclude at that time that Hawke is as revolutionary as the Resolutionists when it comes to the Circle and Chantry based on her being an apostate and living with an apostate and thinks Meredith sucks (like most people in Kirkwall do)


I want to echo this point, because it's a damn good one. You don't have to accept the quest. If you're anti-Chantry and anti-Circle, why would you do anything for the Grand Cleric? Why would you even speak to her?

Oh yeah, because you're a crappy roleplayer.

#80
berelinde

berelinde
  • Members
  • 8 282 messages
You don't have to accept the quest for Sister Nightingale to show up. She's the last face you see in DA2.

#81
Guest_Littledoom_*

Guest_Littledoom_*
  • Guests
Why would I want to kill Leliana? I see no reason for it and what would I gain by doing it?

#82
jbrand2002uk

jbrand2002uk
  • Members
  • 990 messages
My male Hawke just wanted to put his sword in her sheathe

#83
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

berelinde wrote...

You don't have to accept the quest for Sister Nightingale to show up. She's the last face you see in DA2.


Yes...but what does that have to do with Leliana trusting Hawke during the 'Faith' quest?

#84
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

jlb524 wrote...

But Hawke is also willingly aiding a member of the Chantry by even being there and I still don't see how you can conclude at that time that Hawke is as revolutionary as the Resolutionists when it comes to the Circle and Chantry based on her being an apostate and living with an apostate and thinks Meredith sucks (like most people in Kirkwall do)


I want to echo this point, because it's a damn good one. You don't have to accept the quest. If you're anti-Chantry and anti-Circle, why would you do anything for the Grand Cleric? Why would you even speak to her?

Oh yeah, because you're a crappy roleplayer.


Well, my archer mook asked me to and I'd rather not have an Exalted March.

#85
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

jlb524 wrote...

But Hawke is also willingly aiding a member of the Chantry by even being there and I still don't see how you can conclude at that time that Hawke is as revolutionary as the Resolutionists when it comes to the Circle and Chantry based on her being an apostate and living with an apostate and thinks Meredith sucks (like most people in Kirkwall do)


I want to echo this point, because it's a damn good one. You don't have to accept the quest. If you're anti-Chantry and anti-Circle, why would you do anything for the Grand Cleric? Why would you even speak to her?

Oh yeah, because you're a crappy roleplayer.


Well, my archer mook asked me to and I'd rather not have an Exalted March.


He can do it himself. You're not his keeper.

#86
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 10 980 messages

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

He can do it himself. You're not his keeper.


I am his friend, though.

#87
rak72

rak72
  • Members
  • 2 299 messages

RagingCyclone wrote...

I would never kill Leliana...never. But it would have been funny to see Hawke try...bigger, badder, stronger people have tried and yet she's still around. And if my warden was with her...hehe


I would love to have my Warden kill Hawke - Especially Douchy Mc Douchbag iconic male Hawke.

#88
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages
Well, my mage isn't thrilled about the Circle/Chantry but still does the quest because she's a barely tolerated open apostate (as is her live-in girlfriend) in city ruled by Meredith and her Templars. She's supported Orsino but he only wants Meredith to ease off the mages in the Circle and not completely overthrow the whole system (which is the Divine's fear).

But Leliana doesn't know my Hawke's actual opinions or intentions and just being an apostate doesn't mean you want to violently overthrow the Circle and Chantry (see Bethany).

Modifié par jlb524, 22 septembre 2011 - 06:20 .


#89
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 942 messages

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

I want to echo this point, because it's a damn good one. You don't have to accept the quest. If you're anti-Chantry and anti-Circle, why would you do anything for the Grand Cleric? Why would you even speak to her?

Oh yeah, because you're a crappy roleplayer.


Because you want to know what your enemy is up to?  Because you went there in the hope of convincing the Grand Cleric to step in to stop Meredith from being a psycho, but then heard that there might be an Exalted March coming into town and agreed this sounded bad?  Because you think Sebastian is hot?

Of course none of this is a good reason to kill Leliana rather than ask for a bit of clarification.  Particularly if she's a renowned hero of the 5th blight.  Unless you're thinking like Anders and want to provoke a war, I guess.

#90
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

He can do it himself. You're not his keeper.


I am his friend, though.


Really? You're going to sacrifice all your revolutionary values and let the Grand Cleric pat you on the head because Sebastian is your friend? My Relena told Anders to go f*ck himself for asking her to distract Elthina, and she was sleeping with him.

Granted, she was crazy.

#91
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

jlb524 wrote...

But Hawke is also willingly aiding a member of the Chantry by even being there and I still don't see how you can conclude at that time that Hawke is as revolutionary as the Resolutionists when it comes to the Circle and Chantry based on her being an apostate and living with an apostate and thinks Meredith sucks (like most people in Kirkwall do)


I want to echo this point, because it's a damn good one. You don't have to accept the quest. If you're anti-Chantry and anti-Circle, why would you do anything for the Grand Cleric? Why would you even speak to her?

Oh yeah, because you're a crappy roleplayer.


Well, my archer mook asked me to and I'd rather not have an Exalted March.


He can do it himself. You're not his keeper.

If nothing else, I want to know what the Chantry's up to, preferably from its representative. I'd be missing out on intelligence.

In any case, I don't really dislike Sebastian.

#92
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

jlb524 wrote...

esper wrote...

If you are a mage as my Hawke, who publicly supported the first enchanter who is trying to get the nobles to act against the Knight-commander's(illegal) rule in Kirkwall, and live with another apostate (And this should be very easy to hear about if you are a decent spy). It should cross Leliana's mind that coming with vauge threats against the city and saying that other mages is the reason behind the troubles in front of the described Champion is not the smartest nor the most self-preserving statements to make.


That's the same as my Hawke.  But Hawke is also willingly aiding a member of the Chantry by even being there and I still don't see how you can conclude at that time that Hawke is as revolutionary as the Resolutionists when it comes to the Circle and Chantry based on her being an apostate and living with an apostate and thinks Meredith sucks (like most people in Kirkwall do).

I guess I also assume Leliana would have spent most of her time investigating the Resolutionists.


I agree that Leliana can't conclude for sure that Hawke is a revolutionary, but everything  there points towards it being a possibility and if Leliana was anything smart she would have played it on the safe side and not blamed anyone on the unrest and escpially not said anything that could be understood as a possible exalted march to the local hero and claimed protector of the city.

Leliana is there to research the unrest in Kirkwall and say if an exalted march is necessary (at least that is the information Hawke gets). The resolutionists have existed for a long time as a fraction in the circles and have been tolerated. With Meridith holding a position she is not allowed too, The first enchanter trying to get the nobles to act against The Knight-Commander and the local Hero possible (as in my case) adding fuel to the fire by siding with one of the two. Why should Leliana even think to start her investigating and seemingly concentrating on a small and politically powerless group? That is just stupid. And bad spy-work.

#93
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 10 980 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Which is my issue with Hawke in certain moments - like when Sister Petrice acknowledges she tried to start a religious war that involving his death, while Hawke proceeds to do nothing about it but stand there and say something to her. I'd imagine putting an end to Sister Petrice shouldn't be that far-fetched, especially when Hawke is confronting her in a little hovel with nobody there but Hawke, his companions, and the single templar who aided Petrice.


You totally missed my point. I was trying to point out the sheer hypocrisy in your position, ie. arguing that certain people should be killed before they might cause problems vs. arguing the Chantry is wrong for locking up mages because they might cause problems. You seriously don't see the disonnance here?

And again I'll point out that this thread is an exact duplicate of your earlier thread. STOP POSTING DUPLICATE THREADS.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 22 septembre 2011 - 06:40 .


#94
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

Wulfram wrote...

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

I want to echo this point, because it's a damn good one. You don't have to accept the quest. If you're anti-Chantry and anti-Circle, why would you do anything for the Grand Cleric? Why would you even speak to her?

Oh yeah, because you're a crappy roleplayer.


Because you want to know what your enemy is up to?  Because you went there in the hope of convincing the Grand Cleric to step in to stop Meredith from being a psycho, but then heard that there might be an Exalted March coming into town and agreed this sounded bad?  Because you think Sebastian is hot?

Of course none of this is a good reason to kill Leliana rather than ask for a bit of clarification.  Particularly if she's a renowned hero of the 5th blight.  Unless you're thinking like Anders and want to provoke a war, I guess.


I would settle for a question from Hawke saying something like:
Have I understood you correct. Do you really want to recommend the Divine to call and exalted march on Kirkwall?
Of course if Leliana had said yes to thar question my Hawke would have killed her, but surely Leliana would not be stupid enough to say yes to that question, no matter what her intent was.

#95
sakera

sakera
  • Members
  • 130 messages

Reno_Tarshil wrote...

I wonder how faith plays out if you kill her in origins..


Monica21 wrote...

She still shows up.



Just like how Zevran showed up even though my Warden killed him in Origins.

#96
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

sakera wrote...

Reno_Tarshil wrote...

I wonder how faith plays out if you kill her in origins..


Monica21 wrote...

She still shows up.



Just like how Zevran showed up even though my Warden killed him in Origins.




That is a bug. Leliana isn't.

#97
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

esper wrote...

I agree that Leliana can't conclude for sure that Hawke is a revolutionary, but everything  there points towards it being a possibility and if Leliana was anything smart she would have played it on the safe side and not blamed anyone on the unrest and escpially not said anything that could be understood as a possible exalted march to the local hero and claimed protector of the city.

Leliana is there to research the unrest in Kirkwall and say if an exalted march is necessary (at least that is the information Hawke gets). The resolutionists have existed for a long time as a fraction in the circles and have been tolerated. With Meridith holding a position she is not allowed too, The first enchanter trying to get the nobles to act against The Knight-Commander and the local Hero possible (as in my case) adding fuel to the fire by siding with one of the two. Why should Leliana even think to start her investigating and seemingly concentrating on a small and politically powerless group? That is just stupid. And bad spy-work.


Hawke is there as the Grand Cleric's agent, so to speak, and Leliana's job was to pass on information to Elthina.  Perhaps it's risky to trust the person Elthina herself picked to meet with her...perhaps she wanted to tell Hawke this information to gauge how the Champion would react to it?

The question of 'should Leliana investigate other groups' is another issue.  She might have for all we (and Hawke) know, but kept that information to herself.

Basically, most of what she said to Hawke could be a lie.

#98
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

jlb524 wrote...

esper wrote...

I agree that Leliana can't conclude for sure that Hawke is a revolutionary, but everything  there points towards it being a possibility and if Leliana was anything smart she would have played it on the safe side and not blamed anyone on the unrest and escpially not said anything that could be understood as a possible exalted march to the local hero and claimed protector of the city.

Leliana is there to research the unrest in Kirkwall and say if an exalted march is necessary (at least that is the information Hawke gets). The resolutionists have existed for a long time as a fraction in the circles and have been tolerated. With Meridith holding a position she is not allowed too, The first enchanter trying to get the nobles to act against The Knight-Commander and the local Hero possible (as in my case) adding fuel to the fire by siding with one of the two. Why should Leliana even think to start her investigating and seemingly concentrating on a small and politically powerless group? That is just stupid. And bad spy-work.


Hawke is there as the Grand Cleric's agent, so to speak, and Leliana's job was to pass on information to Elthina.  Perhaps it's risky to trust the person Elthina herself picked to meet with her...perhaps she wanted to tell Hawke this information to gauge how the Champion would react to it?

The question of 'should Leliana investigate other groups' is another issue.  She might have for all we (and Hawke) know, but kept that information to herself.

Basically, most of what she said to Hawke could be a lie.



I sure hope this is the case, because if it isn't she is just plain stupid, but it is a bad lie if you Hawke a showing signs of being pro-mage. 

As for Hawke being there as the Grand Cleric's agent. Sure, but Hawke is also the Champion of Kirkwall. At the very least Leliana should assume that Hawke wants to protect the city, because that is how Hawke gained her/his title. And thus no vague threats of exalted marches should be said to the champion.
And even if she doesn't know that, unless Hawke refused to side with either Meridith and Orsino it should be a widespread rumor that Hawke has taken a political stance, and Leliana should really avoid coming with comments about that subject unless, to avoid creating more enemies of the Chantry.

#99
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 990 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Which is my issue with Hawke in certain moments - like when Sister Petrice acknowledges she tried to start a religious war that involving his death, while Hawke proceeds to do nothing about it but stand there and say something to her. I'd imagine putting an end to Sister Petrice shouldn't be that far-fetched, especially when Hawke is confronting her in a little hovel with nobody there but Hawke, his companions, and the single templar who aided Petrice.


You totally missed my point. I was trying to point out the sheer hypocrisy in your position, ie. arguing that certain people should be killed before they might cause problems vs. arguing the Chantry is wrong for locking up mages because they might cause problems. You seriously don't see the disonnance here?


There is no hypocrisy. Petrice wanted to start a religious war. Leliana seems to be saying she'll endorse an Exalted March despite acknowledging that she doesn't have all the facts. Grace is clearly insane and threatening to murder a family member or friend. Taking them out of the equation is about who they are and what threat they pose. How is this remotely similar to being against Chantry controlled Circles?

thats1evildude wrote...

And again I'll point out that this thread is an exact duplicate of your earlier thread. STOP POSTING DUPLICATE THREADS.


This isn't a duplicate thread, because my OP has nothing to do with Leliana's views on mages, which was posted a long time ago.

#100
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 979 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Yet it's part of the narrative that Morrigan reveals that Flemeth will likely return even though she has been slain by The Warden, and Flemeth is an abomination of legend. Leliana is simply an ordinary human who was trained as a bard.



Leliana is also a person who may have had a vision. She believes it was from the Maker, but the Guardian doubts this. That doesn't mean however that she didn't have a vision. Perhaps it came from Fen'Harel the Dread Wolf, Trickster of the Elvhenan?

Who's to say she didn't actually have a divine vision? Perhaps she did, but it wasn't from the Maker. Perhaps some divine being wants her to do something. For all we know it was the bloody Stone that gave her that vision.


LobselVith8 wrote...

Wouldn't the corpse in the ruins have come back to life, then?


That's gameplay, and is not tied to lore.

Also, at first I thought you were talking about Leliana, so I typed out this long comment for that and then I realized you were talking about the lootable corpse. I'm still going to leave my comment here though for people to read and maybe get a good laugh.

Maybe Leliana was reincarnated in a new body by some divine being and we've got another Leliana walking around. One that's rotting.

Of course, that's pushing it I feel.

Though now I'm thinking that there are two Lelianas and it'll be like Kingdom Hearts. One Leliana will be Heartless, having no soul or body but a heart full of Darkness. And even with that heart, they behave entirely devoid of emotions (hence the name Heartless).

And the other Leliana will be a Nobody, having a soul and body but no heart, and thus no understanding of emotions. She will use her memories of her time when she was complete to emulate emotions, but she cannot naturally feel emotions anymore.

That would be both awesome and annoying to see happen in Thedas. Mainly because it wouldn't be an original idea from Bioware.

....now I want to play Kingdom Hearts.



Wynne is an abomination.


Wasn't the point. My point was that Wynne died, but her spirit didn't immediately leave her body. The same thing applies to Leliana.



But Leliana was brought back because she was popular with some people, which is the same reason Anders shows up in Dragon Age 2.


I know, and while that's somewhat bad the devs could've easily just said "Oh you never killed her. She was just unconscious like Oghren". That they're acknowledging that she did die means that the choice to kill her does still matter.

Question: Had they given the player information to doubt whether Leliana was permanently dead, would this be an issue? Because that's all I'm saying. Bioware needs to have more of a plan for the series. Right now, it just seems like they're focusing on the "now" instead of the "now, then, and later on down the line".

Bioware just needs to have codexes update to give a shred of doubt to the player about a person's death.

To be honest though, I'd rather we not be able to kill any companions in the future. Betray? Sure. Knock unconscious? Sure, but at least establish that in the game it happens.

The companions seem like they'll do a lot for the world of Thedas if they're alive, and that's really why I dislike killing them. But any other way to get them out of the party permanently is fine by me.



If the area brought her back, why didn't it bring back Wynne, Kolgrim, the Guardian, or the corpse near the Urn of Sacred Ashes?


Wynne has a Spirit of Faith inside her that brought her back once and could theoretically do so again.

Kolgrim was killed outside of the Gauntlet area, so it doesn't apply to him. He was killed in a cavern that doesn't have any magic infused within it or lyrium running through it.

The Guardian is a spectral remnant tied to the Ashes, and the lyrium in the Mountain is what most likely keeping him alive. There's no guarantee even that a defiled Urn becomes useless. For one thing, dragon's blood grants the drinker more constitution and strength. For another, Kolgrim is insane (Reavers do go insane) and has no knowledge of the arcane yet professes to know something about the arcane.

That corpse near the Urn is just an element of gameplay, and is not equal to lore. The nature of the area -- being an area watched by the Maker -- doesn't mean anyone who dies there will be resurrected. For all we know he walked through the fire without removing his earthly possessions and the Guardian killed him. Why would the area meant to protect the Urn resurrect someone who disrespected the area?



I'm a firm believer in the idea that death should be permanent. Bringing characters back to life simply cheapens any risks because death isn't permanent. I understand the issue about Flemeth, because it's the premise that she's not human and may not permanently die, but when it comes to mortal characters - I don't think they should be brought back.


Had it been established that a person's soul immediately leaves the body upon death in Thedas and had Leliana died in a castle I'd agree with you.

But Leliana died in an area that's supposedly watched by an immortal deity. She may be mortal, but the very nature of the area she died in could render that mortality to be meaningless.



I don't see where being Danarius' slave would inform him about any clandestine plots in Kirkwall, especially if you're telling me that Fenris is merely speaking about rumors that he heard.


The Resolutionists are active throughout Thedas, though they are more active in Kirkwall. He would've probably heard from Danarius that the Magisters support the Resolutionists throughout Thedas, probably under the idea that it'll be easier to recreate an Imperium if you have various factions supporting your cause spread throughout the land.

but that's if Tevinter is in fact supporting the Resolutionists. If they are, then it's a bad thing.


Connor did a better job illustrating the dangers of magic, in my humble opinion.


Yea he did.


I think you have the right idea, Ethereal. Having options within the narrative to support one faction or the other would have been better.

Thanks for sharing your ideas, Ethereal.


Thank you. Image IPB 

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 22 septembre 2011 - 08:02 .