TJPags wrote...
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
Her job is to protect the mages from the populus as well as the populus from the mages. But the mages were never a threat to the populus in this particular instance.
Her job is to work with the First Enchanter and not let her personal bias interfere with her duty.
On both counts she fails utterly because she lets the mob that she thinks will form -- which doesn't thanks to Aveline, the Champion, and the fact that we don't see anyone heading towards the Gallows aside from mages and Templars -- dictate her actions.
She fails in her duty because she wanted that Annulment.
But the thing is, Orsino is opposed to a search . . . not to Meredith leading or taking part in a search.
Sure, she's crazy by Act 3, and getting crazier . . . . but we all know she IS actually right about blood mages in the Gallows.
I have a hard time seeing Orsino's refusal as anything but self-interest after the revelations at the end of the game. And before people say that's metagaming, which it is, his refusal strikes me as odd eve when made. Innocent people should have nothing to fear from a search.
You cannot do that! You have no right! -- Orsino
Doesn't sound like he's opposed to the search. Sounds like he's opposed to Meredith calling for it.
Please Knight-Commander, I beg you. Call off the Right of Annulment. I'll let you search the tower. I'll even help you! But don't punish us all for an act we didn't commit! -- Orsino
That doesn't sound like a man who is interested in only himself. That doesn't sound like a Circle beyond saving. That sounds like a man who would gladly surrender to justice for being an academic blood mage.
The mages were innocent of that act. Were they entirely innocent? We don't really know. For all we know Hawke cleaned house and killed every blood mage in the Gallows. We only encounter one after the RoA is called for, but we don't know if she was always a blood mage or if the Templars threatening her life drove her to become a blood mage.
You mistake me, I think.
Your first point doesn't relate to this discussion, really. Yes, part of her job is to protect mages from the people. But another part of her job is to police the mages, and make sure they obey the law. Those are not mutually exclusive.
We were talking about her role as Knight Commander and all of the duties that go with it. It's indeed relevant.
Again, she has no reason to suspect that the mages in the Gallows are blood mages. Only the Starkhaven mages were blood mages, and Thrask was the mastermind behind the rebellion. It died with him. He was the leader.
Her own Knight-Captain even questions the mages and Templars involved that weren't killed. There is no reason to assume that the rebellion is still alive when it died with its leader and everyone involved surrendered or was killed.
I'm fairly certain that even the game's journal cements this fact.
Your second point, you kind of look at backwards. Sure, he capitulates to the search. But it's really irrelevant.
No it isn't.
He first - before Anders blows the Chantry - opposes the search. A search by the Knight Commander, when we know for a fact there are blood mages in the Circle at that time. Sorry, but I have a very hard time believing the Knight Commander has no right to order a search of mage quarters for signs of blood mages. Especially when there was just a conspiracy foiled that featured several blood mages.
He opposed Meredith being the one to call for it, being the one to lead the search, and everything. His quarrels are with Meredith. Not the Templar Order, not the Templars in her ranks, and not the Chantry.
It's Meredith he has a beef with.
As for the rebellion, see above.